Posts Tagged ‘Senate’

« Older Entries | Newer Entries »

Concerns that Liberal anti-terror bill looks to protect rights at expense of security

Tuesday, June 6th, 2017

The problem is, as the government’s own report on its consultations makes clear, the “secret and complex nature” of national security work means Canadians have no idea whether law enforcement officers need additional powers… The disruption provision allows CSIS to seek a court warrant to break laws or breach Charter rights, short of causing bodily harm or obstructing justice.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Governance Policy Context | No Comments »


Appointing independent senators: Leave the skepticism behind

Thursday, November 3rd, 2016

… the very purpose of a Senate composed of appointed members was to ensure that senators would consider the public policy issues of the day on their merits, not on the basis of preprogrammed positions dictated from above by party leadership. Canadians have seen this ideal compromised through patronage appointments, excessive partisanship and executive interference by previous Prime Ministers’ Offices. This is precisely why the government’s policy is to not exercise top-down partisan control over any member of the Senate

Tags: , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


The Senate finally does something right

Wednesday, October 12th, 2016

… the proposals fall into three categories: providing greater openness, improving internal operations and generating better legislation. In principle all are desirable… [including] a proposal to group senators into “caucuses” rather than parties… all represented on committees… But a less rigid, us-versus-them, in-versus-out pattern of debate and voting would still be an improvement, perhaps even a useful model for reforming the Commons

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Canada needs a Senate and our Senate needs to be fixed. Here’s how

Thursday, June 11th, 2015

Ottawa should bypass the bad old approach to constitutional negotiations by tabling a specific reform proposal and appealing directly to the electorate for a referendum mandate to enact its proposals… The provinces, faced with a federal proposal endorsed in a national referendum, would find it very hard to resist… the chances of getting the reforms through the formal amendment process increase dramatically. Put the people first and the provinces will follow.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Let the Senate reform itself

Tuesday, March 17th, 2015

… changes would be to encourage the Senate to effectively and expeditiously propose amendments that the Commons must consider. Indirect vetoes would be largely eliminated and direct vetoes made more difficult. The Commons would be faced with clear proposals for amendments and be forced to consider their merits. Without the prospect of having to deal harshly with threatened vetoes, the Commons might consider Senate amendments more on their merits.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Policy Context | No Comments »


How Canada’s creation changed the world

Friday, May 16th, 2014

What was needed was a compromise, and this came in June 1864 when a Canadian coalition government adopted the principle of federalism as a way out, with rep by pop for the central government in Ottawa and provincial rights for a francophone Quebec. Federalism also offered a basis for a grand union of the British North American colonies… Nothing could be more dissimilar than the way in which the Americans and Canadians made their constitutions.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance History | No Comments »


Don’t give up on Senate reform

Sunday, April 27th, 2014

We are not stuck with the status quo. We are simply faced with the same challenges we always were. Establishing an equal, elected and effective Senate was never supposed to be particularly easy… If Mr. Harper really wants a better Senate, he can start doing that today simply by making better appointments

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Disparaging Senator Eggleton is dirty pool

Saturday, February 22nd, 2014

He acted as chairman of an extensive, two-year study: In From the Margins — A Call to Action On Poverty, Housing and Homelessness, released in 2009. It was cochaired by recently retired Conservative Senator Hugh Segal. Together with the other committee members they came up with 76 recommendations for improvements. Both have and continue to champion a guaranteed annual income, showing that, in the long run, such a plan will save Canada money.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Social Security Debates | No Comments »


In defence of an appointed Senate

Monday, June 17th, 2013

The Senate committee on social policy has done some of the best work in the country on mental health, directly leading to the creation of the Mental Health Commission of Canada… the Senate’s efficacy as an institution of governance depends on the quality of the appointments. More of what Britain calls “crossbenchers” – non-aligned members – would help depoliticize or at least departisan-ize the Senate and raise the level of the debate.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Senator shows why ‘sober second thought’ matters

Wednesday, April 24th, 2013

Cowan began his speech by putting Bill C-377 in context. “It’s part of a larger story, one in which the government of Stephen Harper is trying to systematically silence individuals and organizations that dare to challenge it publicly,” he said. Then he set out his proof… It has now spread through the women’s movement, the academic community, the anti-poverty network and social media.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


« Older Entries | Newer Entries »