Archive for the ‘Governance’ Category

« Older Entries | Newer Entries »

Divide and conquer: How the feds split the provinces in health talks

Wednesday, February 1st, 2017

The Liberal government entered into the health accord talks with as much leverage as it could hope for. The federal government alone has the authority to determine the size and scope of the Canada Health Transfer, whether or not the provinces agree to it… Without a legal bargaining position, the provinces must rely on their ability to criticize and embarrass the federal government as leverage. The upcoming federal budget gives the Liberals another stick to wield.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Make Canada great. It’s in our hands, not Trump’s

Saturday, January 28th, 2017

… Australia spends just 9 per cent of GDP on health care. If Canada spent that little, we’d be saving more than $20-billion a year… How can we rethink our prison system, so that offenders, many of whom have mental health and addiction issues, get treatment and education and become less likely to reoffend? … Canada’s prosperity, though improved by American proximity and the efficiencies of trade, is not determined by it.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


A short (surprising) history of democratic reform

Thursday, January 12th, 2017

The problem with electoral reform, then and now, is that it’s such a hard sell, and most people aren’t buying — federally, provincially, even internationally: In the UK, a 2011 referendum on an AV (ranked ballot) system failed miserably despite the support of many influential leaders. Our own politicians remain bitterly divided because electoral reform means different things to different parties — and meets with indifference from most people.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Governance History | No Comments »


Economic challenges test Trudeau’s promise of more progressive path

Tuesday, January 10th, 2017

No government wants to raise taxes. But there are modest steps Trudeau could take to relieve the fiscal pressure without great political risk, both of which he has promised. The first: collect what’s owed. Canada currently loses tens of billions of dollars annually through tax evasion… The second: deliver on the promise to review tax loopholes, many of which overwhelmingly benefit the rich with no obvious public utility.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Conservatives need a moderate, humane agenda

Tuesday, January 10th, 2017

Canadian voters have a keen sense of when the machine of government becomes too self-reverential, too captive of the left or right, too much about hopeful aspiration and too detached from day-to-day street-level reality. The duty of every Official Opposition is to put down the rose-coloured mirror and take up the magnifying glass to see and understand what modern society needs to encourage enterprise, productivity and genuine equality of opportunity…

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Let demise of the U.K. be our warning

Monday, January 9th, 2017

Britain has privatized itself at great cost… The National Health, Britain’s medicare, is collapsing from underfunding in a nation that has already privatized its rail, gas, electricity and water… the private sector is partly or fully responsible for parole, prisons, schools, roads, hospital services, mail, welfare assessments, court interpreters and much more… Next up for outsourcing/privatization are, seriously, child protection and the law courts.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Time for Ottawa to make sure top CEOs pay their fair share

Wednesday, January 4th, 2017

… most of the compensation for the top 100 CEOs was in the form of stock options and grants of stock, which are taxed at just half the rate of regular salary or bonuses. This is an enormous tax break that costs the federal treasury an estimated $1 billion a year… runaway CEO pay highlights the broader and more serious issue of growing inequity in our economy, and all the social ills that come with it.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Why would Ottawa even consider a tax that won’t increase revenue, but hurt middle-class Canadians?

Wednesday, January 4th, 2017

Many employers will have to choose between offering benefit plans and sustaining employment levels, and individuals will have less money to help them get through the week. In addition, taxing employer-paid health and dental benefits would provide limited savings, if any, to the federal government. Analysis… clearly shows that introducing a refundable tax credit for individual insurance would likely cost more to the treasury than the savings from taxing health benefits.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Don’t eliminate tax exemptions just to raise federal revenue

Friday, December 23rd, 2016

A growing number of tax carve outs has artificially created winners by bestowing privileges on a select group of taxpayers (in this case, those with employer-provided health and dental plans). Special tax preferences also increase the cost of complying with the tax system because claiming a tax benefit (credit, exemption, deduction) requires keeping records, ensuring eligibility and perhaps hiring an accountant to ensure you’re not missing out on any tax benefits.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


10 charts that defined Ontario in 2016

Thursday, December 15th, 2016

#1: Ontario’s Persistent Gender Pay Gap… #2: Ontario’s social assistance gap… #3: The predatory loan trap… #4: Ontario’s inadequate minimum wage… #5: Where the jobs are… #6: Housing affordability out of reach… #7: Home Sharing or Alt-Hotels? … #8: Toronto is finally talking revenue options… #9: Neglecting public services… #10: On the path to balanced budget

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | 1 Comment »


« Older Entries | Newer Entries »