Archive for the ‘Governance Debates’ Category
« Older Entries | Newer Entries »
Backed into a corner, Liberals seek compromise on parliamentary reform
The government has narrowed the list of issues that it considers crucial — reforming question period to institute a Prime Minister’s Questions once a week; ensuring governments are forced to justify proroguing the House; ending the use of omnibus legislation; and, reform of the Estimates process to give MPs a better sense of what it is on which they are voting. What’s not to like in any of those if you are an opposition MP?
Tags: ideology, jurisdiction, participation
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
The dangers in a Liberal plan to ‘fix’ Parliament
The imbalance in Canada’s Parliament is weighted entirely in favour of a majority government and its legislative agenda, not the other way around, as Mr. Trudeau’s party absurdly claims. That’s because MPs, who were once elected to form governments, and oversee them, now mostly serve the wishes of their parties. The neutering of MPs has been constant over the past 50 years, and it is the reason so many Canadians find Parliament to be irrelevant.
Tags: featured, jurisdiction, participation
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
Policy-makers should pay attention to world happiness rankings
That’s the whole purpose of the happiness report. To raise the awareness that there are these scientifically replicable measures of the quality of life that don’t give you the same answers as GDP and don’t invite the same policies that maximizing GDP would mean… If these numbers are taken seriously, it’s to raise the level of policy awareness and discussion.”
Tags: economy, featured, globalization, jurisdiction, participation, standard of living
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
Trump threatens to derail Trudeau’s economic fairness agenda
Trump’s vow to cut U.S. taxes “bigly” does make it more difficult for Canada to raise its levies on the well-to-do, which Morneau has also been contemplating. Last year, the finance minister announced plans to look at tax breaks, sometimes called tax expenditures, which cost the federal treasury billions. But the Liberals will find it more difficult to boost taxes on the wealthy if, as expected, Trump’s America is going in the opposite direction.
Tags: budget, economy, ideology, standard of living, tax
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
Cutting the fiscal fat, finance ministers find lot of baloney
Every budget dollar is precommitted to: debt service (approximately 9 per cent), transfers for health, education etc. (24 per cent), guaranteed spending for Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplement etc. (17 per cent), and salaries and pensions for its own employees (29 per cent). When all the obligatory spending is sliced from the budget pie, every Canadian finance minister is left with about 20 cents of the budget dollar.
Tags: budget, economy, ideology, jurisdiction, tax
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
Alternative Federal Budget 2017: High Stakes, Clear Choices
… we’re urging the federal government to table a budget that makes good on its promises to reduce income inequality and drive inclusive growth… the AFB proposes a federal budget that takes decisive action on what matters to Canadians: creating jobs, reducing income inequality, lowering poverty levels, closing unfair and expensive tax loopholes, and getting the economy moving.
Tags: budget, economy, ideology, poverty, standard of living, tax
Posted in Governance Debates | 1 Comment »
For a progressive federal budget, Liberals must stick to their promises in the Trump era
… the government has barely begun to act on its promises to bring about transformational change for First Nations communities through investments in education and basic infrastructure… Significant new revenues could, and should, be raised – by tackling tax loopholes for the most affluent… progressive policies, rather than a race to the bottom, will create not just a fairer society, but also a more productive and future-oriented economy.
Tags: budget, economy, ideology, Indigenous, participation, standard of living, tax
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
The problem with $47 billion in unpaid taxes
Think of what could be accomplished if that money was actually collected by the federal government; the programs it could fund, the benefits it could offer to citizens, the improvements to health care that would be possible. The federal deficit could be eliminated. Moreover, collecting this $47 billion would demonstrate to all Canadians the federal government is working hard to ensure everyone pays their fair share, no more and no less.
Tags: budget, crime prevention, economy, featured, globalization, jurisdiction, standard of living, tax
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
How Canada can lead on the global stage
The struggle against extremist violence will require more than bombs and bullets. It also demands an understanding about creating stronger institutions, better education and social conditions, and the stability and security in which businesses can thrive and create jobs. “Aid,” “Emergency Humanitarian Assistance,” “Defence,” “Diplomacy,” are not separate silos but have to be made to fit together.
Tags: budget, economy, globalization, ideology, standard of living
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
Federal budget should close gap between rhetoric and resources
The government should… index the Canada Child Benefit to inflation, fix the EI system by creating fair and universal criteria for access, and pay for… affordable housing… [and] the $155 million in emergency relief it promised to First Nations children living on reserves… On the revenue side… it should continue to invest in tax compliance… [and] limit or scrap some of the many loopholes… that benefit the richest with no evident contribution to the public good.
Tags: budget, featured, housing, Indigenous, poverty, standard of living, tax
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »
Recent Comments