« Older Entries |

It’s not an ‘affordability crisis,’ it’s a class conflict

Friday, August 30th, 2019

It’s not an affordability crisis, it’s a class conflict. It requires redistribution of wealth, not population… But they pin it on affordability, as if it’s a virus that calls for bed rest, rather than on the rich and their agenda since the 1980s, starting with with the panic over “deficits,” a word that came out of nowhere, too, so that public spending had to be slashed and taxes cut since “it’s your money and you should keep it” — as if you can build your own schools and public transit, once you’ve got a few more bucks in pocket.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Equality Debates | No Comments »


Paul Ryan re-ignites old collectivism vs individualism debate

Sunday, August 26th, 2012

16 August 2012
… take the Internet, which is shredding hard-won dogmas about individual property and ownership created during capitalism’s three or four centuries. Just when you get rid of those pesky proletarian revolutionaries, along comes a new, essentially collectivist technology making similar trouble… Given the undeniable (it seems to me) collective underpinning of all our lives, what’s astounding isn’t claims for “collectivism,” which simply describes what we are; it’s the emergence of individuals and even individualism from such a powerful collective base.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Referendums at heart of Swiss political system

Wednesday, August 8th, 2012

July 21, 2012
… referendums aren’t just an aspect of Swiss democracy, they’re its most distinctive, beloved element. On a national level they’re usually held four times a year, with multiple items each time. On cantonal (provincial) or local levels, they’re even more common… there, voting happens constantly. Not just voting, but weighing and debating. “The whole society is in a constant state of discussion… The process has a moderating rather than radicalizing influence, leading to what’s called a negotiation or consensus democracy

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance History | 1 Comment »


Political obsolescence is in the eye of the beholder

Friday, March 30th, 2012

Mar 29 2012
Now, labour-hostile governments are all anyone under 40 has seen… I don’t blame the neo-liberals (also known as neo-cons) for having taken their shot… Their formulas turned out to lead directly to the crash of 2008 but, in the manner of true believers in all eras, they said we hadn’t done enough of what they prescribed. Our lack of faith in their creed was the problem; it was time for more austerity, deregulation etc… It suggests an opening for something different and genuinely new. Like what — activist, redistributive government?

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Jason Kenney’s immigrant song sounds strangely off-key

Sunday, March 25th, 2012

Mar 08 2012
This is the Harper version of multiculturalism. They couldn’t have copied the outright anti-immigrant, anti-multiculti stances of admired figures like Germany’s Merkel or France’s Sarkozy…. Jason Kenney appears at (almost) every ethnic gathering yet sounds negative and hostile in most of his policies: denouncing levels of fraud in getting citizenship, changing the test, banning veils at the ceremony and this week attacking “birth tourism.”

Tags: , ,
Posted in Child & Family Policy Context | No Comments »


The decline of deference [and the internet]

Friday, December 30th, 2011

Dec 29 2011
That sense of an alternative way to run things is what the Internet may have implanted. In its early years, flame wars and other epidemics of egomania obscured its potential for collective, lateral decision-making. But now there’s Wikipedia and it works. You don’t need the Encyclopaedia Britannica and its stable of authorities. Or at least: you needn’t defer to them; they’ve become another resource. The discovery of new ways to decide leads to a diminished need for authority… The power of authority diminishes when you can hear credible, contesting voices.

Tags: ,
Posted in Equality Debates | No Comments »


The Bible and ethical economics

Saturday, December 24th, 2011

Dec 22 2011
In his book, Economics of Good and Evil… Sedlacek says, a moral thread runs through economics until the modern era, based on a sense of mutual human responsibility. With that moral element now eliminated, you wind up bailing out (“forgiving”) the biggest, most powerful debtor/sinners, i.e. the banks, but doing nothing for the poor and destitute, who were supposed to inherit the Earth… Nobody uses econometrics to calculate gifts they give or gratitude they feel. The whole process is uneconomic — but only in the withered, current sense.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Equality Debates | No Comments »


On More Street Politics

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

Dec 13 2011
Star Columnist Rick Salutin says democracy isn’t something that happens just at elections. The most important fights take place between votes.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


New charity, same old cant

Friday, November 4th, 2011

Nov 03 2011
The Globe say these methods “could revolutionize” social programs by creating “a world in which profit motives and the greater good move in tandem.” That would revolutionize us all the way back to Dickens’ time… As for Philanthropy, it literally means love of man, or humanity. You don’t sense much of that in the New version, though there’s lots of self-praise, and a sense of power through the ability to micromanage the effect of your donation.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Inclusion Policy Context | No Comments »


Where have all the PCs gone?

Saturday, October 1st, 2011

Sep 29 2011
Never mind whether they should be called “Red Tories.” They sought power in order to do something, not just punish certain demographics by cutting welfare (Harris), building prisons (Harper) or creating chain gangs (Hudak). They didn’t think government was “the problem” like Ronald Reagan, a hero of their right-wing conservative successors, or that society didn’t exist at all, like another such hero, Margaret Thatcher. Labels and ideology mattered little to them… It involved a sense of the usefulness of government and the importance of some kind of social solidarity, expressed largely through public institutions and programs.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Governance History | No Comments »


« Older Entries |