Timely warning for Canada about prisons

Posted on September 9, 2011 in Child & Family Policy Context

Source: — Authors:

TheStar.com – opinion/editorialopinion
Published On Thu Sep 08 2011.   By Carol Goar, Editorial Board

Just in time for the opening of Parliament, a new book entitled A Plague of Prisons has landed in Canada.

It tells the story of the “mass incarceration” of Americans over the past 30 years, showing how it has torn families apart, exacerbated racial tensions, drained state treasuries and fostered a culture of violence and vengeance.

The author, Ernest Drucker, an epidemiologist at The City University of New York, begins his tale with the passage of tough new state sentencing laws in 1973. Nelson Rockefeller, the governor of the day, was determined to get drug dealers off New York’s streets. He persuaded the legislature to enact mandatory prison sentences, requiring judges to send lawbreakers convicted of selling two ounces of “narcotic drugs” to jail for at least 15 years and stripping them of any discretion to take into account extenuating circumstances.

Over the next 25 years, New York’s prison population increased fivefold.

Other states quickly jumped on the wagon, imposing evermore onerous sentences on non-violent criminals. The hunger to punish reached its apex in 1994, when California enacted its Three Strikes and You’re Out law, requiring sentences of 25 years to life for three-time offenders. Individuals caught shoplifting or stiffing a contractor became old men behind bars.

These policies were popular among angry, anxious voters. But they did not produce any reduction in the drug trade, nor did they prevent crime.

Between 1980 and 2009, America’s prison population quintupled. It now has the highest rate of incarceration in the world (715 inmates per 100,000 people).

What makes all this relevant to Canadians in September of 2011 is that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is poised to embark on the same path the U.S. took a generation ago. Shortly after the opening of Parliament, his government will introduce a package of 12 tough crime bills. They’re guaranteed to become law; the Conservatives now have a majority in both the House of Commons and Senate.

Harper’s legislation is not as draconian as Rockefeller’s. It would require Canadian judges to impose a mandatory one-year sentence for possession of heroin, cocaine or methamphetamine with the intention of trafficking (two years if a weapon or threat of violence is involved) and a six-month to three-year sentence for selling recreational marijuana. But it springs from the same crackdown mentality and taps into the same belief that harsh punishment reduces crime.

What makes Drucker’s book compelling is not the statistics he presents; most of them are well known. It is the way he traces the explosion of America’s prison population back to one politician’s gut-driven policies and the way he uses his skills as a clinical psychologist to track the consequences on the streets of Harlem and the South Bronx.

Drucker wrote his analysis as a wake-up call to his fellow Americans, not as a warning to Canada. But it offers readers on this side of the border a foretaste of what lies ahead if Harper ignores the advice of everyone from health-care professionals to toppled media magnate Conrad Black, who has seen the American justice system from the inside.

Assuming the Prime Minister goes ahead, here is what Canadians can expect:

• An exponential growth in prisons. The Conservatives have refused to provide taxpayers with a credible estimate of how much they plan to spend on penitentiaries. It won’t be as costly as the American crackdown, which threatens to bankrupt several states, but the bills will keep mounting long after Harper’s departure.

• A deterioration of the social structures that communities need to prevent crime.

• A disproportionate increase in the number of poor, non-white people behind bars.

• A belated recognition that there was never any evidence tougher sentences improve public safety.

• And over time, a made-in-Ottawa “plague of prisons.”

Is this the legacy we want for our children? Is it the future we want for Canada?

<  >

Tags: , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Friday, September 9th, 2011 at 11:59 am and is filed under Child & Family Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Timely warning for Canada about prisons”

  1. Belinda says:

    WOW!! I am embarrassed to be made aware of the frame of mind our Prime Minister has on the topic of incarceration! Whatever happened to Canada’s wonderful,friendly reputation with acceptance to all citizens? So, do we just lock up criminals and keep them there? Imagine the expense involved in that mentality! Give half of that cost to social programs, and I am willing to bet this preventative action will be a win-win situation; lets get to those troubled citizens BEFORE they get to the point of incarceration!
    Using this forceful attitude may have some benefits, but using the fear tactic will also have it’s disadvantages; think of a time you may have been threatened in your life; what type of feelings did that stir in you? When you back someone in a corner they usually come out swinging, so using this forceful, cold frame of mind is NOT what Canada is known for!! This type of new war on crime is exactly that; a war; Canadians need to speak out against this tragic idea before we make a serious mistake in our approach.
    An overwhelming amount of our incarcerated population suffer from addictions, depression and other forms of mental health illnesses; so lets put our focus on solving those problems; the REAL problems. If we can decrease the prisoners’ psychological/mental health/addiction problemed areas, they can learn to become productive citizens; a much more humane solution. Incarceration is a band-aid solution that simply covers up the truths, so let’s stop wasting our hard earned money on prisons and get down to PREVENTION.
    Steven Harper, you’re approach is one I seriously fear.

    Belinda Hurley


Leave a Reply