The how, the why [violent crime]

Posted on August 8, 2012 in Equality Debates

Source: — Authors: – commentary/letters/july-24
Published  Jennifer Wells

After reading Margaret Wente’s article on the Danzig Street neighbourhood in Toronto where two people died in last week’s mass shooting (Portrait Of A Killing Zone – July 23), I paused for a moment and tried to imagine life there.

A page or so later, I saw a description of a $4-million home that boasts a mahogany library and an 1,100-bottle wine cellar. You know the big predictor of violent crime in a city? Income inequality.

< >

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 8th, 2012 at 4:01 pm and is filed under Equality Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

4 Responses to “The how, the why [violent crime]”

  1. La vie a été très simple, mais nous avons aussi ne pouvait pas l’aider à devenir très compliqué.

  2. Je préfère traiter avec des lignes parallèles ne se croisent jamais, cependant, a été la mer à garder belle. Parce que si – une fois se croisent, après ce point sera plus éloignés.

  3. Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.

  4. I’d rather and you are parallel lines, forever won’t intersect, but could have been facing keeps good. Because if – denier, that points intersect the farther the away.


Leave a Reply