Private vs. public: B.C. case could reshape medicare
TheGlobeandMail.com – Opinion
Sep. 06, 2016. ANDRÉ PICARD – Public Health Reporter
It has been called the greatest threat to medicare in a generation and perhaps the most important constitutional challenge ever.
Beyond the political and legal hyperbole, however, the case pitting Cambie Surgeries Corp. against B.C.’s provincial health-care service – which begins Tuesday in B.C. Supreme Court – boils down to a seemingly simple question: Should patients be able to pay for care in private clinics if they can’t get timely care in the public system? (Or, conversely, should government be able to ban the commercialization of “medically necessary” care because it believes doing so serves the greater public good?)
Dr. Brian Day, the Vancouver orthopedic surgeon and co-owner of the Cambie Clinic who has become the public face of private health care in Canada, is trying to achieve two thing with his constitutional challenge of the Medicare Protection Act: Strike down the ban on the sale of private insurance for “medically necessary” care (meaning hospital and physician services), and quash the law that says physicians cannot practise simultaneously in the public and private systems.
It has to be said up front that Dr. Day has a strong case. Back in 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on a similar matter (known widely as the Chaoulli case), striking down the ban on the sale of private insurance for medically necessary care. But there were two important catches: 1) The case was fought using the Quebec Charter of Human Rights, so it applied only to Quebec, and 2) the court said the prohibition on private insurance could be justified if waits were not unreasonable.
While the Chaoulli ruling was groundbreaking, it did not throw the doors open to private care in Quebec, as many predicted. Insurers did not offer insurance for “medically necessary” care because there is essentially no market for the product. But there has been a steady growth in private clinics in the provinces, with many patients paying out-of-pocket for services.
So, while the Day case has potentially broad repercussions – because six provinces currently ban the sale of private insurance and, in several provinces, physicians must opt out of medicare if they want to sell their services privately – it’s a bit too early to declare the death of medicare.
What the case will do, however, is expose many of the absurdities and contradictions in the way we fund and regulate health care.
For example, the court will hear the surreal story of a B.C. teacher who injured both his knees, one on the school playground, and the other while skiing on the weekend. Surgery was performed promptly on one knee because it was a workplace injury and workers’ compensation pays for private care. But the teacher had to wait much longer for surgery on the other knee because it was repaired in the public system.
The court will also hear the tragic story of Walid Khalfallah, a teen who faced a 27-month wait for scoliosis surgery in B.C.; his family opted for surgery in the United States and the young man ended up with paraplegia. Despite his treatment in the United States, the long wait for surgery was blamed for the outcome.
While both the provincial and federal governments are fighting to maintain the ban on private access to medically necessary care, ironically (or perhaps hypocritically is a better word), most of the surgery done at private clinics is contracted by public-sector institutions such as WorkSafeBC, the Canadian Armed Forces, the RCMP, Indigenous and Northern Affairs and Correctional Service Canada.
Dr. Day says his ultimate goal is to push Canada to have a “hybrid system” of public and private care, as is the norm in most European countries.
The reality is that Canada already has a hybrid system, with 70 per cent of care publicly funded and 30 per cent privately funded. What makes this country unique, however, is it is the only one that bans private insurance for hospital and physician care but, at the same time, makes most patients depend on private insurance for prescription drugs, dental care and long-term care.
Simply stated, we have an outdated definition of what is “medically necessary” and a wrong-headed view that universal health care can only be delivered with a 100-per-cent public insurance model.
Dr. Day’s legal challenge, if nothing else, is going to force us to address these issues. Allowing some private provision of care and broader use of private insurance does not mean the death of medicare.
On the contrary, if the proper regulatory safeguards are put in place, and public health dollars deployed for a wider range of services (as in most European countries), we should emerge with a medicare system that is more universal and more fair.
< http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/private-vs-public-bc-case-could-reshape-medicare/article31697218/ >
Tags: budget, disabilities, featured, Health, ideology, privatization, rights, standard of living, tax
This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 6th, 2016 at 11:00 am and is filed under Health Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
335 Responses to “Private vs. public: B.C. case could reshape medicare”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
Hello there! I really enjoy reading your blog! If you keep making amazing posts like this I will come back every day to keep reading.
This is definitely a wonderful webpage, thanks a lot..
Nice blog here! Also your web site loads up very fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol
I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing issues with your site. It appears as though some of the written text on your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before. Appreciate it
Nice piece of info! May I reference part of this on my blog if I post a backlink to this webpage? Thx.
Awesome post. It’s so good to see someone taking the time to share this information
have already been reading ur blog for a couple of days. really enjoy what you posted. btw i will be doing a report about this topic. do you happen to know any great websites or forums that I can find out more? thanks a lot.
Just want to say what a great blog you got here!I’ve been around for quite a lot of time, but finally decided to show my appreciation of your work!
I wish I could craft such articles as this. Thank you very much.
When are you going to post again? You really entertain me!
Very Interesting Information! Thank You For Thi Information!
Αν έχεις ήδη αποφασίσει να φύγεις από τις πλατφόρμες με ελληνική άδεια ΕΕΕΠ, η ερώτηση δεν είναι «αξίζει;» αλλά «ποια από αυτές αξίζει περισσότερο;». Ελέγξαμε 15 διεθνείς στοιχηματικές εταιρείες που λειτουργούν στην Ελλάδα το 2026: ανοίξαμε λογαριασμούς με ελληνικά στοιχεία, δοκιμάσαμε καταθέσεις με κάρτα και κρυπτονόμισμα, και μετρήσαμε τον πραγματικό χρόνο ανάληψης. Το βασικό κίνητρο για τους περισσότερους είναι πρακτικό: οι διεθνείς πλατφόρμες δεν εφαρμόζουν αυτόματη παρακράτηση φόρου επί των κερδών, δεν κόβουν λογαριασμούς που κερδίζουν συστηματικά και προσφέρουν ευρύτερη γραμμή με περισσότερα αθλήματα. Οι εταιρείες που ακολουθούν δέχονται εγγραφή από την Ελλάδα, η πρόσβαση στον ιστότοπο δεν απαιτεί VPN και κανένας από αυτούς δεν βρίσκεται στον κατάλογο αποκλεισμένων τοποθεσιών της ΕΕΕΠ κατά την τελευταία επικαιροποίηση.
Glad to be one of many visitants on this amazing site : D.
Wpisujesz w wyszukiwarkę frazę „polskie kasyno” i chcesz znaleźć sprawdzoną platformę? Najczęściej chodzi o licencjonowane kasyno online dostępne dla graczy z Polski, które oferuje BLIK, korzystne promocje, szybkie wypłaty oraz obsługę w języku polskim. Porównujemy operatorów pod kątem rejestracji, metod wpłat i wypłat, bonusów bez depozytu, darmowych spinów, poziomu wsparcia klienta oraz liczby dostępnych gier. Ranking na 2026 rok obejmuje serwisy dostępne dla graczy z Polski, ale nie sprowadza się jedynie do listy najlepsze kasyna online. Publikujemy również recenzje operatorów, dane dotyczące licencji i statusu prawnego, informacje o popularnych grach, zasady bezpiecznej oraz odpowiedzialnej rozgrywki, a także porównanie platform internetowych z kasynami stacjonarnymi.
310761 739808What cell telephone browser is this website page optimized for Internet explorer? 334449
Great blog here! Additionally your website rather a lot up very fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate link for your host? I desire my website loaded up as fast as yours lol
Most often since i look for a blog Document realize that the vast majority of blog pages happen to be amateurish. Not so,We can honestly claim for which you writen is definitely great and then your webpage rock solid.
Hey very cool site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds also…I’m happy to find so many useful information here in the post, we need develop more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .
I can’t go into details, but I have to say its a good article!
A good web site with interesting content, that’s what I need. Thank you for making this web site, and I will be visiting again. Do you do newsletters? I Can’t find it.