Ottawa urged to better fund legal aid

Posted on August 19, 2013 in Equality Delivery System – news
AUGUST 19, 2013.   By Tobi Cohen, Postmedia News

Canada’s justice system has become out of reach for many of those who need it most, according to a new report by the Canadian Bar Association that calls on the federal government to restore legal aid funding to the level it was at in the mid-1990s as part of a systemic overhaul to be completed by 2030.

The summary report released Sunday at the organization’s annual convention in Saskatoon said while legal aid funding has increased over the last five years, it’s still down about 20 per cent overall compared to pre-1994 levels.

Furthermore, the federal government has gradually reduced its share of funding for both criminal and civil legal aid. Up until 1995, the report argues, the federal government split the cost with the provinces and territories 50-50. It now contributes just 20-30 per cent of the cost.

“Like health care, justice is a shared governmental responsibility,” says the report. “A reinvigorated federal role is imperative if we are to reach equal justice.”

The report calls on the government to return to 50 per cent cost sharing in criminal matters and to establish a “dedicated” contribution to civil legal aid. It also calls for legal aid services to be expanded and improved.

“The reduction in federal spending overall, increased complexity in the substantive law and growing demands for criminal legal aid have placed pressure on legal aid providers to ration services – in a way often inconsistent with the general purpose and public policy values underlying the program,” says the report.

“In some places, people qualify only if they are living at subsistence levels (social assistance), leaving out the working poor.”

The lack of access to legal assistance, the report says, has resulted in a spike in the number of unrepresented litigants. While most pronounced in family court, it’s estimated that 10-80 per cent – depending on the court and subject matter – of litigants represent themselves.

It means court staff are more often forced to “walk a fine line” between providing legal information and advice – the latter of which they’re forbidden from providing, says the report. Studies also suggest “unrepresented parties” lose their cases more often and more severely than those with representation and that self-help legal services only really benefit those with “higher levels of literacy.” The growth of unrepresented litigants, the report adds, has also led to an entire pro bono industry.

But legal aid isn’t the only answer. The report outlines a number of other ways to facilitate access to justice and improve the system overall.

The report calls for “law as a life skill” courses to be integrated into the school curriculum and for legal training modules to be available in the workplace as well as to new immigrants, adults entering retirement and young adults entering the workforce.

It also calls on the justice system to make better use of new technologies, for legal expense insurance to become commonplace and for the creation of a “universal Canadian legal health checklist” as a means of preventing legal troubles before they surface.

“Just as the health system aims to both prevent and treat disease, so too the justice system should aim to prevent legal problems in addition to providing assistance when they arise,” the report says.

“The legal health checklist model ties together ideas of prevention, resilience and increased legal capability. A number of legal practice websites encourage people to have an ‘annual legal health checkup’ or offer checklists of situations in which legal needs or issues often arise.”

The report also encourages the “team delivery” of legal services whereby lawyers, paralegals and other experts work together to offer a wider range of more affordable legal services and calls for greater investment in legal research and development and the creation of a Canadian Centre for Justice Innovation.

< >

Tags: , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Monday, August 19th, 2013 at 11:50 am and is filed under Equality Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Ottawa urged to better fund legal aid”

  1. After reading the article “Ottawa urges to better fund legal aid” I have a few opinions I would like to share. I believe that the summary report done by the Canadian Bar Association brought up many important points that I hope are taken seriously by the federal government. I believe that their findings are true regarding the lack of accessibility many Canadians struggle with when finding help regarding legal issues. I think that the working poor class and the population that is on some form of social assistance are the ones that need this assistance the most. It is unfortunate to see that they are the ones that are losing out on help. I don’t understand how the federal government who implement the cuts to these programs don’t see the domino effect that can happen. The population that is unable to access these programs are members of the most vulnerable in society. If they are working poor class it may mean that they didn’t have the access to be educated on the law system at a young age. If their family was working poor themselves growing up they could have been surrounded by these acts of crime which could put them in the risk category for committing crimes themselves. As the report states, members who are unable to receive some form of legal aid increases the risk of them losing their case, and also increases the severity of consequences for losing the case. Members of society that lack the education to be prepared for their trials and cases also lack the chance for winning. These groups of our population are in need of help and guidance through the stressful time of preparing a case.
    I believe that the report also came up with many thoughtful and plausible action plans in order to help the situation of legal aid in Canada. I agree with these ideas such as implementing the skills and lessons of law into the school curriculum. This gives students a chance to learn knowledgeable lessons regarding criminal offences and the law system which could help decrease the amount of crime committed. Having them learn the consequences to these offences could help them develop ethical personal boundaries, preventing them from committing such crimes in the future. I also agree with applying legal training in the workforce for those who didn’t have the opportunity to understand the law system and structure when in school. This helps give everyone an equal playing field for obtaining this vital knowledge.
    I believe the report’s best advice was when they encouraged there to be a “team delivery” of legal services. I believe this important for different reasons. I think that being able to network between lawyers, paralegals and other experts in law can help bring together a closer community bond. This can help with filling in the gaps of the legal system because services in the city will be able to communicate and be aware of the resources that their clients have available to them. It also helps with making sure that no client is able to fall between the cracks and feel left behind. Whoever is working with these individuals can offer referrals to other programs and services in the community.
    I believe that everyone deserves support and advice during a stressful time in their life. Understanding the legal system can be difficult for even a well educated person. I think that everyone should be able to access support and programs that will help guide them through the process.


Leave a Reply