The illusion of participatory democracy
NationalPost.com – Full Comment
October 3, 2016. SPENCER MCKAY
A summer of seemingly endless town-hall meetings on various issues is now being capped off by the recent launch of an online consultation process on national security, cross-country hearings of the electoral reform committee, and Minister of Democratic Institutions Maryam Monsef’s community dialogue tour. Canadians are being given lots of opportunities to share their thoughts with the government, but it remains to be seen if the Liberals are actually listening.
It’s not clear how the thousands of comments made by citizens across the country are supposed to condensed, summarized and incorporated into the policy-making process. Without clear criteria for how to bring the findings of these meetings together, how should citizens assess whether the process is working? The major problem with the government’s strategy is that none of these processes seem designed to actually facilitate decision-making.
Reports from electoral reform town halls note that crowds are often in favour of a new electoral system. This is unsurprising because those who want change are organized and have an incentive to attend, while those who do not care about the issue are likely to remain unengaged. The results coming from the current processes are probably not representative samples of the population.
One well-documented problem is that town halls often fail to include the marginalized voices that are regularly mentioned in the government’s rhetoric. The failure to provide translation to Inuktitut during the minister’s visit to Nunavut was a well-noted failure in this regard, but overall, older, wealthier and more educated people are more likely to engage in policy debates. A recent Ipsos poll found that despite the flurry of meetings held over the summer, only 19 per cent of Canadians know that electoral reform consultations are taking place.
It’s also not clear that the conversations being had at these events are thoughtful or informed. Consider, for instance, a town hall meeting that took place in Toronto on Aug. 16. The meeting was hosted by six local MPs and was supposed to discuss “climate change, innovation, defence and veterans affairs” within the span of 90 minutes. Trying to cram that many topics into such a short period of time does not allow participants the time needed to go in-depth on any of the issues, or to foster critical dialogue.
The single-issue electoral reform meetings are not much better. Many MPs simply do not know enough about the options for electoral reform and have enlisted academics and activists to fill the gaps, while others are left to rely on a toolkit that was widely panned upon release.
At best, the government’s zest for listening to constituents appears aimless or incompetent. While they promise participatory government, it looks more like an opportunity for the government to validate the thoughts and opinions of voters, while proceeding as it would have anyway.
Such a tactic relies on the conversational nature of the in-person meetings and the open-text answer spaces of the online consultations, which allows the government to select statements that support its position, while ignoring others. If participants feel that this has happened — if they don’t see their opinions reflected in the final decision — this might simply reinforce their distrust of elected officials.
The government’s willingness to listen is refreshing to many on the heels of a Conservative government that preferred to go it alone on major changes. When they work well, consultation processes can build trust and legitimacy for policies, but the opposite result might come about if the Liberals don’t clarify how they plan to translate what they’re hearing into what they’re going to do.
< http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/spencer-mckay-the-illusion-of-participatory-democracy >
Tags: featured, ideology, participation, rights, standard of living
This entry was posted on Monday, October 3rd, 2016 at 10:41 am and is filed under Governance Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
189 Responses to “The illusion of participatory democracy”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
I really like your writing style, excellent info , thanks for putting up : D.
Howdy I wanted to write a new remark on this page for you to be able to tell you just how much i actually Enjoyed reading this read. I have to run off to work but want to leave ya a simple comment. I saved you So will be returning following work in order to go through more of yer quality posts. Keep up the good work.
I’d like to be able to write like this, but taking the time and developing articles is hard…. Takes a lot of effort.
476165 615349Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how a lot attempt you set to make this type of great informative website. 252239
Does it look like we’re in for a big ride here?
Hello there, You have done an incredible job. I will certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this site.
My coder is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on numerous websites for about a year and am nervous about switching to another platform. I have heard great things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into it? Any help would be really appreciated!
I was reading through some of your content on this internet site and I believe this web site is very informative ! Continue posting .
Hiya, I am really glad I have found this information. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossip and net stuff and this is actually frustrating.
I wish I could craft such articles as this. Thank you very much.
Well done! Keep up this quality!
I had fun reading this post. I want to see more on this subject.. Gives Thanks for writing this nice article.. Anyway, I’m going to subscribe to your rss and I wish you write great articles again soon.
I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.
Good job for bringing something important to the internet!
These stories are so important.
The start of a fast-growing trend?
A good web site with interesting content, that’s what I need. Thank you for making this web site, and I will be visiting again. Do you do newsletters? I Can’t find it.
Have you given any kind of thought at all with converting your current web-site into French? I know a couple of of translaters here that will would certainly help you do it for no cost if you want to get in touch with me personally.
I dont think I’ve read anything like this before. So good to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. cheers for starting this up. This blog is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality.
Αν έχεις ήδη αποφασίσει να φύγεις από τις πλατφόρμες με ελληνική άδεια ΕΕΕΠ, η ερώτηση δεν είναι «αξίζει;» αλλά «ποια από αυτές αξίζει περισσότερο;». Ελέγξαμε 15 διεθνείς στοιχηματικές εταιρείες που λειτουργούν στην Ελλάδα το 2026: ανοίξαμε λογαριασμούς με ελληνικά στοιχεία, δοκιμάσαμε καταθέσεις με κάρτα και κρυπτονόμισμα, και μετρήσαμε τον πραγματικό χρόνο ανάληψης. Το βασικό κίνητρο για τους περισσότερους είναι πρακτικό: οι διεθνείς πλατφόρμες δεν εφαρμόζουν αυτόματη παρακράτηση φόρου επί των κερδών, δεν κόβουν λογαριασμούς που κερδίζουν συστηματικά και προσφέρουν ευρύτερη γραμμή με περισσότερα αθλήματα. Οι εταιρείες που ακολουθούν δέχονται εγγραφή από την Ελλάδα, η πρόσβαση στον ιστότοπο δεν απαιτεί VPN και κανένας από αυτούς δεν βρίσκεται στον κατάλογο αποκλεισμένων τοποθεσιών της ΕΕΕΠ κατά την τελευταία επικαιροποίηση.