How Canada got a step closer to taming its big fiscal beast
TheGlobeandMail.com – ROB/Commentary
Mar. 08, 2016. Dylan Marando
Dylan Marando is a PhD student at the University of Toronto and a former adviser in the Office of the Premier of Ontario.
On Feb. 23, the Department of Finance made the unprecedented decision to release tax expenditure figures in database format. You may not have felt the tremor, but this liberation of hitherto cloistered information was earth-moving in the world of Canadian public finance. It has brought us one step closer to understanding and thus taming Canada’s most unwieldy fiscal beast – a hidden multibillion-dollar boondoggle born from an excessive politicization of public policy.
For years now, the government has been drifting toward the use of tax expenditure as a means of policy, and we have lacked the tools to analyze what’s happening. Colloquially known as boutique tax breaks, benefits, or loopholes, this policy instrument has generated programs such as the Public Transit Tax Credit and the Children’s Fitness Tax Credit. Measures such as these are thought to incentivize desired behaviours through targeted tax relief.
It sounds simple, almost like a tax cut. But, in fact, these budgetary boogeymen are subsidies to the select few, often conveniently benefiting the sorts of voters that form the support base of the political powers that be. Many tax expenditures, but thankfully not all, are disproportionately beneficial to the wealthy given their countervailing effect on the progressivity of the income tax system. Research by Ben Sand and Peter Taylor for the Frontier Centre For Public Policy notes that the top income quartile in Canada claims 43 per cent of the value for the aforementioned public transit credit and 71 per cent of the value for the children’s fitness credit.
As the Parliamentary Budget Office reported, already in 2009 there were 189 of these programs, costing the government more than $100-billion a year and representing an astounding 7.5 per cent of gross domestic product. The cost of tax expenditures is greater than the voted appropriations of the federal government.
More troubling, tax expenditures are invisible in the policy discourse. They are not reported in the budget. There is no statutory obligation to review them. As far back as 1976, those skeptical of the tool’s stubborn opacity and growing power asked the government to inform Parliament of costs and benefits. The parliamentary secretary to the minister of finance rose and said: “The information requested is not generated routinely in the regular processing of taxation data. To obtain this information would require special data processing the cost of which would be several thousand dollars. Answering the question would thus be prohibitively expensive.”
Amazingly, that answer was the standard for 40 years. The government did not start reporting on tax expenditures in any form until 1979. It was not until 1994 that the Department of Finance began publishing estimates; even then, the information that came was highly unusable.
In an analysis from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Canada’s former chief statistician said of the programs: “Taxpayers neither know accurately how much tax they are paying nor do they have any knowledge of the many ways their tax dollars are being spent, and with what effectiveness.” In the United States, critics have been sounding alarms for years. Cornell University professor Suzanne Mettler argues that tax expenditures create a “submerged state” that detaches the public from policy making, thus enabling governments of the right and left to pursue ideological agendas without public push-back. Prof. Mettler sees this phenomenon as a threat to democratic institutions and evidence-based policy making. My doctoral research seeks to test Prof. Mettler’s thesis in the Canadian context. But roadblocks abound, including access to coherent data.
The trend to hide these expenditures is beginning to change. To be sure, there is a long road ahead. The first step is accurately describing tax expenditures. Then, advocates need to call for the elimination of those programs not well aligned to the broad public interest. We must do more to grasp the political implications of a tax-expenditure-driven system of public policy. Thankfully, we are one step closer.
< http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/how-canada-got-a-step-closer-to-taming-its-big-fiscal-beast/article29056199/ >
Tags: budget, economy, featured, ideology, participation, tax
This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 8th, 2016 at 1:15 pm and is filed under Governance Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
439 Responses to “How Canada got a step closer to taming its big fiscal beast”
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
Загляните в [url=https://telegram.me/s/andrii_nebytov]официальный тг Драгонмани[/url], чтобы испытать удачу и насладиться захватывающей игрой в Telegram!
Главной задачей является умение правильно распоряжаться своими ресурсами и делать ставки.
Pretty impressive article. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your opinions. Any way I’ll be coming back and I hope you post again soon.
Thanks for posting this. Looking for these resources 😀
Great write-up, I am a big believer in placing comments on sites to inform the blog writers know that they’ve added something advantageous to the world wide web!
I believe you have remarked on some very interesting points , thankyou for the post.
Чтобы начать играть на официальном сайте Пин Ап и пройти регистрацию, перейдите по ссылке [url=https://t.me/pinupchat]casino pin up[/url], где вы сможете пройти быструю и безопасную регистрацию.
Онлайн-казино Пин Ап является одной из ведущих платформ для игры и азартных развлечений.
Для новых пользователей важным этапом является регистрация на официальном сайте .
Регистрация включает в себя заполнение личных данных и подтверждение учетной записи .
Чтобы начать регистрацию, нужно нажать на кнопку «Зарегистрироваться» в верхнем меню .
Обязательно выберите надежный пароль и проверьте правильность введенных данных.
После ввода данных подтвердите аккаунт, перейдя по ссылке в письме или в сообщении.
Регистрация на платформе осуществляется по безопасным протоколам и защищена от несанкционированного доступа .
Зарегистрированные пользователи могут пополнять счет и участвовать во всех мероприятиях платформы.
Таким образом, регистрация на официальном сайте Пин Ап — важный этап начала работы с платформой .
We are putting together the wardrobe for a local performance. The opening scene calls for a fairly restrained appearance. Later scenes use the same clothes with different accessories. I keep encountering style systems that connect visual lines with body types. I saved [url=https://outfitbuilder.top]body shape and colour analysis[/url] as a reference for the discussion, but I am unsure where those categories help with this particular decision. A structured jacket makes the character seem more formal. That does not necessarily tell me anything about the actor. We have time to compare three outfits before the next rehearsal. My aim is to compare shape without ignoring movement. The director is interested in what the audience can read from a distance, so subtle details may matter less than the overall outline. How would you distinguish character styling from personal style advice?
My office is bringing back regular in-person days, so I have been trying on jackets again. What looks proportionate in the mirror does not always feel comfortable on my commute. Longer jackets solve that problem but change the outline of every outfit underneath. I bookmarked [url=https://outfitfinder.top]personal style analysis[/url] as a starting point for naming what I am comparing. My aim is to compare garment lines with my proportions, without turning a category into a restriction. Should my first comparison use the same trousers and footwear for every jacket? My plan is to photograph both angles and record whether each jacket stays comfortable seated. I would also appreciate tips on checking shoulder placement when the sizes vary between brands. I would like the final choice to work with a backpack and ordinary walking shoes. Which practical detail would you test before deciding whether a style category is useful?
Our amateur theatre group needs two costume proposals. The character stays the same throughout, but the director wants to compare a precise silhouette with a relaxed one. Our starting point is the existing costume cupboard. I have been looking into [url=https://styleessences.top]color and body type analysis[/url] to understand how style systems describe the lines of an outfit. I am interested in the effect of the costume as a whole. Both options need to allow comfortable movement during rehearsal. Keeping the camera position fixed would make comparison easier. I would keep accessories simple for this first test. Body typing labels cannot answer every question about a stage costume. The director will see the costumes under rehearsal lighting before we choose anything for the performance. I can make a small comparison sheet showing the same pose and a few movement notes. What visual details would you record before discussing the options?
I am comparing three secondhand coats online, and none of the sellers accepts returns. Each label suggests my usual size, although the pictures reveal little about shoulder room. I started reading about body shape systems because I wanted a better way to compare silhouettes. I plan to ask each seller to use the same measuring points, since inconsistent descriptions would make the numbers difficult to compare. What I still need is a small set of garment dimensions that can support a practical comparison. For background, I have been looking at this reference: [url=https://findyourbodyshape.top]color and body type analysis[/url] My best fitting coat could provide a baseline if I measure it flat with the buttons fastened. Layering matters here, which means I need to consider extra room as well as my body proportions. Which measurements would you request first, and how would you compare a straight cut with a shaped waist?
For a sketching assignment, I am collecting examples of different outfit silhouettes. Each card needs a description that another student can test against the picture. An exaggerated pose makes it hard to tell what comes from the garment itself. I put [url=https://bodyshapestyle.top]body shape and colour analysis[/url] on my reading list while looking for clearer terminology. My first check would be a simple front view beside the more expressive drawing. I could annotate where the jacket ends, where the skirt widens and how the sleeves hang. I would compare the silhouettes in grayscale before adding notes about color. Our tutor asks us to distinguish observation from interpretation, and I want the cards to make that distinction visible to the whole class. Does anyone have a classroom exercise for checking whether a style description is reproducible? I would appreciate a method that works with simple sketches and clearly stated observations.
I am organizing a library discussion about personal style guides, and our first exercise compares two conflicting recommendations. The same outfit feature is praised for continuity in one book and criticized for lacking definition in another. It is hard to tell whether the advice conflicts because of the underlying framework or merely the wording. My proposed exercise uses two sketches of one outfit, with just the disputed feature altered between them. For a starting reference, I have noted [url=https://bodytypeguide.top]color and body type analysis[/url] and I would ask what each framework predicts before discussing what the drawings actually show. What would make this a fair comparison rather than an exercise designed to confirm one system? Ideally, the session would end with better questions about style advice and room for individual judgment. We will record the reasons behind each recommendation before comparing the drawings, so that different definitions remain visible throughout the discussion.
The costume team for our community performance has asked me to shortlist a few recognisable wig styles. We need a layered silhouette that remains visible under stage lighting without covering the performer’s eyes. One starting point in my collection is [url=https://layeredhaircuts.top]avril lavigne hairstyles[/url] for this project. The difficulty is choosing which details belong to the cut and which come entirely from styling. There are two quick changes during the show, leaving almost no time to fix the hair. I would like to keep the wig comfortable and avoid trimming it until we have tested the outline. Has anyone translated a celebrity hairstyle into a simple stage wig without losing its main features? We also need to check that the wig stays secure when the performer turns quickly and moves between the wings and stage. Advice about securing the front sections would be especially useful before our next costume rehearsal.
I am sorting hairstyle references for a character in our next amateur theatre production, alongside the costume notes. We are considering a blonde curtain fringe, but the actor needs an unobstructed view throughout the performance. My reference folder uses photographs, since written haircut descriptions alone leave too much room for misunderstanding. For this comparison, I am using [url=https://shorthaircuts.top]blonde hair with curtain bangs[/url] as a reference. Before anything is cut, we want to compare styling the current fringe with using a temporary costume hairpiece. There are two quick costume changes, so a style that needs careful resetting after every scene would be awkward. At rehearsal, I would like to compare front and side views under the actual lights before settling on a shape. If you have handled theatre hair before, what details would you record so another helper can reproduce the style?
Growing out a straight fringe has left me with an awkward middle stage. The centre pieces reach my cheekbones, while the sides are still uneven. I have been looking at [url=https://haircutideas.top]blonde hair with curtain bangs[/url] for ideas about the outline, although the photographs rarely explain the transition between cuts. My aim is to connect the front sections to the longer hair gradually. A slightly uneven centre part seems to be where my hair naturally falls. Blow-drying changes the direction temporarily, but daily styling is not my preference. Would you tidy the side sections at this stage or let everything catch up first? I plan to take photographs showing how it falls after air drying. I usually wear the rest of my hair loose, which makes the difference between the short front pieces and the longer sides quite noticeable. Hearing how others handled the in-between length would help me decide what to ask for.
I am helping with wardrobe for a community production and need to describe a layered wig to another volunteer. The director wants movement around the face, but our current reference folder contains almost nothing except front views. My concern is that we might describe the styling in a photograph instead of the haircut underneath it. The terminology question I am starting with is [url=https://haircutfinder.top]what is a butterfly haircut[/url] and I would welcome other useful references. I would like a reference sheet showing the outline from several angles, with short notes beside each picture. Because the costume has a noticeable collar, we need to consider where the back of the wig will sit. We can discuss any trimming with the person preparing the wig once the intended outline is clear to everyone. Does anyone have a simple checklist for choosing clear haircut references from several different angles?
Our community theatre needs a bobbed wig for a character, but the reference folder mixes several lengths. The costume sketch has a blunt outline. I am trying to separate the overall shape from the styling in each picture before we choose anything. Several examples sit below the chin. [url=https://hairstylesimulator.top]bob haircut lengths[/url] could be a useful starting point for comparing proportions, although a preview cannot tell us how a wig will move. There is a fast entrance in the second scene. The headset needs space around the ears. I would like to take a short list into rehearsal instead of asking everyone to choose from dozens of unrelated pictures. Would you check the neckline before the fringe? A few practical reference angles would help. We can try the silhouette before making alterations. Which details would you flag for the wig stylist?
My teenager has asked about getting a layered haircut. The reference pictures all show a bouncy finish, but the everyday routine is usually a quick wash followed by letting the hair dry on its own. I hope we can discuss upkeep without making the choice feel intimidating. The decision should still belong to the person wearing the haircut. One useful question came from looking up [url=https://virtualhairstyles.top]butterfly haircut maintenance[/url] since the styling steps matter as much as the picture. It would help to compare a styled finish with an unstyled one. We also need to ask about tying the hair back for school. A manageable routine would make the decision clearer. We are not trying to copy every detail of a reference photo. We can take notes during the appointment and ask which steps are optional. That would make it easier to distinguish ordinary care from styling for a special occasion. How would you make that consultation useful for someone new to layers?
Our family photo archive needs captions, but the faded prints make some hair colors difficult to describe. A warm cast in one print makes a relative look much redder than in the neighboring photograph. The family cannot tell me whether that difference reflects a real color change or simply the print. For vocabulary rather than identification, I have been looking at [url=https://haircolorpalette.top]hair color analysis[/url] while keeping any description separate from a confirmed fact about the person. I could state how the hair appears in the print and leave the original shade undecided. I would retain the original scan alongside edited versions and explain which image the caption describes. The captions will be shared with younger relatives who never met these people, which makes careful wording more useful than a confident guess. Does anyone have a concise caption format for uncertain hair shades in older family photographs?