Five things about crime and doing the time in Canada

Posted on December 4, 2011 in Child & Family Policy Context

Source: — Authors: – news
Dec 3, 2011.    Sarah Boesveld

The Post’s Sarah Boesveld lists five things you should know about the Statistics Canada Report on Cases in Adult Court by Province 2009-10:

1. Cases on the decline
Canada’s courts heard far fewer criminal cases during the period of 2009-10 than the year prior, dropping to 262,616 criminal cases from the 392,907 disposed of by judges in the 2008-09 period. The number of cases was almost the same the year before that, but about 3% higher than in 2006-07. Before that, criminal court case loads had been dropping for four years.

2. Guilty as charged
Of the 262,616 cases put before the courts in 2009-10, 183,204 of the defendants were deemed guilty under the Criminal Code. Of that figure, 71,417 were sent to prison, 100,956 were put on probation, 8,281 received a conditional sentence, 6,699 were ordered to pay restitution, 28,757 were fined and 88,019 received some other kind of sentence.

3. Some provinces are harsher on drunk drivers
Prison time for some crimes varies according to province. Prince Edward Island, for example, has long had the highest rate of incarceration in general, with a special interest in locking up drunk drivers. Judges threw the book at 94% of people who were found guilty of impaired driving in 2009-10, the report shows, whereas British Columbia sent only 3% of drunk drivers to prison in the same period, below the national average of 9%.

4. Screening affects incarceration

Provinces such as B.C. and Quebec weed out offenders deemed to have committed less serious crimes before charges are even laid, said Anthony Doob, a professor of criminology at the University of Toronto. Ontario is also doing a lot more screening of cases to see if some can be handled out of court. “The ones that go forward in a jurisdiction that screens out a lot of cases tend to be more likely to have a prison sentence associated with them,” he said. “The ones where there’s no screening, they’re going to have all these minor offences and they’re going to look like they’re lenient, when in fact they’re more harsh because they’re bringing more people to court.” This could colour the statistics, such as the disparities seen in jail time for sexual assault and drug possession.

5. Pre-trial custody time doesn’t count in sentence
Not in the available data, anyway, although that time served will be recorded from 2010-11 henceforth. Ontario’s prisons are made up of approximately 68% of people who have not been found guilty of a crime, says Prof. Doob. Nationwide, it’s closer to 40%. When a sentence is handed down, prisoners are supposed to get credit for the amount of time they served during the pre-trial period. That can make a difference in statistics if someone is charged with unwanted sexual touching, for example, serves two months in jail, then is sentenced to two months. They would be set free.

< >


< na1203_crimesentencing.jpg >

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, December 4th, 2011 at 5:50 pm and is filed under Child & Family Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Five things about crime and doing the time in Canada”

  1. Kelsey Marshman says:

    Although this was a very concise article about crime in Canada, it brought rather interesting facts. I thought it was astonishing that out of 262,616 court cases only 183,204 people were deemed guilty. Even more surprising to me were the many forms of “guilty” that were presented. I understand that many people are given community service time, but I did not realize the variety of punishments received. For instance out of the 183, 204 only 71,417 people were sent to prison. This made me question, what were these people guilty for, that less than half were sent to prison? Also 88,019 were given some other type of sentence, what does this mean? What type of sentence were they given? I find it almost amusing that it wasn’t stated in the article and it definitely makes me question the law and what rules it consists of. Also, this article is about crime in Canada, which is why I do not understand the large variation between the different provinces. In regards to drinking and driving, Prince Edward Island has very strong beliefs and has punished 94% of people who have committed the crime, where only 3% of people were punished in British Columbia. I know that every province has their own set of rules and regulations, but I believe they should be closer in comparison. Every province is under the federal government of Canada, so I believe there should be similar rules for every province to live by. Additionally, some provinces view the court system in a different way, which I do not agree with. In some provinces all cases go to court and are settled. Where in other provinces there is a screening process to determine if the case is court worthily. I know people say this is to save time and effort, but what if one case slips by in the screening process? I know the court system is a long and painful process to most, but as a citizen of Canada, I would feel safer if each case was given attention and I’m sure the people in involved would agree as well. This article is entitled five things about crime and doing the time in Canada, therefore I believe all offences should be taken into the same account everywhere. I do not believe someone should be able to drink and drive in one province with no punishment, but be severely punished in another province. An equal ground must be established through every province, in order to keep the crime in Canada under control.


Leave a Reply