Federal Surplus Comes with Social Costs, Critics Say
TheTyee.ca – News – Number of government departments ‘lapsing’ budgets up from 10 years ago: CCPA.
15 Sep 2015. By Jeremy J. Nuttall
If Canadians want to see how the federal government managed to reach a surplus for the 2014-15 fiscal year, they should think of veterans struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder and other wounds, said veterans’ advocate Tom Beaver.
The Conservative government ran a surprise $1.9-billion budget surplus last year, its first since 2008. The surplus has been attributed in part to government “lapses” in spending, in which departments do not spend their full allotted budgets for the year.
Veterans like Beaver have complained a $1.1-billion lapse in spending over several years at Veterans Affairs could have been used to keep department bureaus open across the country, or to help vets who were wounded in the line of duty.
The government has also changed its lifetime pension payments for wounded soldiers to lump-sum payouts, and that has resulted in a court battle.
Beaver said news of the surplus feels like a slap in the face, and the government shouldn’t lapse spending in needed departments. “The [Conservatives] could have had more money if they didn’t spend thousands fighting veterans in the courts,” he said sarcastically.
Beaver said he knows the money didn’t only come from veterans, but from Canadians in general.
On Monday, the Ottawa Citizen reported the government underspent by $8.7 billion in total across government departments last year.
Lapses increased since 2008: CCPA
David Macdonald, senior economist at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said there’s nothing new about spending lapses, but their frequency has increased since the 2008 financial crisis and ensuing stimulus.
He said during the early 2000s, about seven per cent of government department budgets would lapse, but last fiscal year that number was around nine per cent and has gone as high as 10 per cent.
There are many reasons why government money could go unspent, such as cautious managers worried about running out of payroll funds, he said.
But another issue has been money set aside that is hard to access, such as infrastructure funding reserved for municipalities to fund public-private partnerships.
Macdonald said those funds can be overly complicated to apply for, so municipalities don’t bother, leaving a pile of money to go back to the treasury.
That causes problems for the public interest, he said.
“It’s going to delay implementation of programs,” Macdonald said. “That infrastructure project with money sitting there ready to go, it’s tied up in a process that doesn’t allow it to get out.”
National Defence, Aboriginal Affairs and Veterans Affairs all saw spending lapses last year, he said.
In the meantime, economic growth leading to employment and other benefits are delayed, he added.
That goes against the claim made by Tory MPs in Parliament that their spending lapses represent fiscal prudence, Macdonald said.
“Parliament votes for the money to be spent that they think is going to be spent. To not spend that money by delaying projects or making it harder for cities to access money that’s sitting there doesn’t make a lot of fiscal sense,” he said.
“[The government] shouldn’t delay particular projects or wrap them up in bureaucratic red tape in order to delay them so there’s a possibility down the road they can say, ‘Look, there’s all this extra money.'”
Small surplus not the issue: Stanford
According to Unifor economist Jim Stanford, a surplus or deficit of such a small magnitude shouldn’t be an election issue anyway.
Stanford said the real issue is why the Conservatives have kept Canada walking a tightrope of recessions and deficits for most of their time in office.
During that time, the country’s employment rate has never managed to reach levels prior to the 2008 recession, he has argued in the past.
Now, Stanford said, the government’s focus on austerity is making matters worse for the outlook of job creation.
“It’s certainly true the spending cutbacks have worsened the situation and in that regards contributed to the recession,” he said. “There’s no doubt that government austerity made the economy much weaker, and thereby allowed the low oil price to tip the whole economy into negative territory.”
< >
Tags: budget, economy, ideology, participation, poverty
This entry was posted on Sunday, September 20th, 2015 at 4:16 pm and is filed under Inclusion Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
317 Responses to “Federal Surplus Comes with Social Costs, Critics Say”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
Your thing regarding creating will be practically nothing in short supply of awesome. This informative article is incredibly useful and contains offered myself a better solution to be able to my own issues. Which can be the specific purpose MY PARTNER AND I has been doing a search online. I am advocating this informative article with a good friend. I know they are going to get the write-up since beneficial as i would. Yet again many thanks.
I encountered your site after doing a search for new contesting using Google, and decided to stick around and read more of your articles. Thanks for posting, I have your site bookmarked now.
I’m partial to blogs and i actually respect your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and preserve checking for new information.
Tips and tools you offer are so helpful to agencies in our community.
Abnormal this put up is totaly unrelated to what I was searching google for, but it surely used to be listed at the first page. I suppose your doing one thing proper if Google likes you adequate to place you at the first page of a non similar search.
Spot on with this write-up, I actually assume this website needs far more consideration. I will in all probability be once more to learn rather more, thanks for that info.
you’re in reality a just right webmaster. The web site loading velocity is incredible. It sort of feels that you’re doing any distinctive trick. In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve performed a great process on this topic!
Sometimes, the sheer magnitude of the information seems overwhelming.
I will share you blog with my sis.
OK, you outline what is a big issue. But, can’t we develop more answers in the private sector?
I absolutely adore your site! You aggressive me as able-bodied as all the others actuality and your broiled PS is absolutely great!
These are some of the most important issues we’ll face over the next few decades.
thank, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your article. I really appreciate your wonderful knowledge and the time you put into educating the rest of us.
Thanks pertaining to discussing the following superb written content on your site. I ran into it on the search engines. I will check back again if you publish extra aricles.
Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Therefore let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!
Nevertheless, it’s all carried out with tongues rooted solidly in cheeks, and everybody has got nothing but absolutely love for their friendly neighborhood scapegoat. In reality, he is not merely a pushover. He is simply that extraordinary breed of person solid enough to take all that good natured ribbing for what it really is.
I Am Going To have to come back again when my course load lets up – however I am taking your Rss feed so i can go through your site offline. Thanks.
This website has lots of really useful stuff on it. Thanks for informing me.
Amazing content on your website.
I was reading through some of your content on this internet site and I believe this web site is very informative ! Continue posting .