CPP, subsidizing survivor pensions, not fair — to a point
Posted on October 3, 2017 in Social Security Debates
—
NationalPost.com – Health/Seniors
September 29, 2017. WANDA MORRIS
It’s not fair!
I remember my 10-year-old self being absolutely incensed. My older sister was getting new clothes; I was getting (mostly) hand-me-downs.
My mom explained that there wasn’t enough money for new clothes for both of us, and my sister’s old clothes had plenty of life left. It wasn’t fair. But, in retrospect, with limited resources and growing children, it was the right thing to do.
Today, I hear a lot about unfairness from our members. One subject that draws more anger than most is the Canada Pension Plan (CPP).
The plan is a bit like reverse life insurance. In life insurance, you pay a premium for decades with one of two outcomes: you die early and your survivors receive a cheque, or you die late and are rewarded with a long life.
In CPP, the opposite happens, you either get both a long life and lots of pension cheques, or a short life and a moderate benefit to your surviving spouse, if you have one.
Besides the unarguable unfairness of dying young, many spouses are aggrieved because their survivor’s pension is only a fraction of their spouse’s full pension (the survivor’s pension is 60 per cent of the spouse’s pension) or they don’t get even that (combined earned and survivor pensions cannot exceed the maximum earned pension under CPP).
Others, who have no surviving spouse, are angry that they can’t pass their survivor’s benefit to anyone else and are effectively forced to subsidize survivor’s pensions for those who are married.
The proposed Ontario Retirement Pension Plan (ORPP) attempted to rectify this by providing everyone paying into it a survival benefit for their spouse, beneficiary or estate if the individual died within 10 years of retirement. When Ontario dropped its provincial pension program in favour of a national CPP enhancement, this refinement was dropped along with it.
Not only do the benefits paid out of CPP vary by the recipient’s marital status and longevity, the amount paid in to receive a particular level of benefit can vary considerably, too.
While all working Canadians aged 18 to 65 who earn $3,500 or more from one employer must contribute to CPP; only our 39 top-earning years are used in calculating our pensions from CPP. As long as we’ve paid maximum CPP premiums in at least 39 years, we are eligible for the maximum CPP pension payout. We could work another 10 or 20 years, but our pension cheque will not change.
An additional provision lets parents who took time out to raise children drop additional years and still qualify for a maximum CPP payout. While the child-rearing provision can be exercised by whichever parent is the primary caregiver for their children, some men argue that their premiums should be reduced so they aren’t subsidizing CPP benefits for (primarily) women who are out of the workforce.
The fundamental problem with CPP is that it serves two masters: it’s designed to serve as a self-funding aid to financial security in retirement and to alleviate the plight of impoverished single seniors, most of whom are women. If CPP were designed purely as a pension plan with no “interference” from policy objectives, pension payments would correlate with years worked, and individuals who are married would have to take a lower benefit on retirement so that funds would be available to pay a survivor’s pension benefit to their spouses.
Is CPP fair? No. But it’s also not fair that far too many older single women live in poverty. Subsidizing child-rearing years and paying survivors’ pensions may not be fair, but it’s the right thing to do.
http://nationalpost.com/health/seniors/grey-matters-cpp-subsidizing-survivor-pensions-not-fair-to-a-point
Tags: ideology, participation, pensions, standard of living, women
This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 3rd, 2017 at 12:40 pm and is filed under Social Security Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
333 Responses to “CPP, subsidizing survivor pensions, not fair — to a point”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
Thank you pertaining to sharing the following great subject matter on your website. I ran into it on google. I am going to check to come back after you publish additional aricles.
I will share you blog with my sis.
I would really like to appreciate the endeavors you cash in on written this article. I’m going for the similar best product from you finding out in the foreseeable future as well. Actually your creative writing abilities has urged me to begin my very own blog now. Genuinely the blogging is distributing its wings rapidly. Your write down is often a fine illustration showing it.
very good post, i certainly love this web site, keep on it
There is so much to try to understand
I was suggested this website by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my difficulty. You are wonderful! Thanks!
Enjoyed reading through this, very good material. Thanks!
Howdy, a helpful article for sure. Thank you.
Thank you a lot for sharing this with all folks you actually recognize what you’re speaking about! Bookmarked. Please additionally visit my site =). We can have a hyperlink trade contract among us!
What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to contribute & help other users like its aided me. Great job.
I believe this web site has some really wonderful info for everyone : D.
I had highly recommend this blog to my good friend, it’s so good
I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.
I absolutely adore your site! You aggressive me as able-bodied as all the others actuality and your broiled PS is absolutely great!
I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.
Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Therefore let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!
Pretty impressive article. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your opinions. Any way I’ll be coming back and I hope you post again soon.
Greetings, have tried to subscribe to this websites rss feed but I am having a bit of a problem. Can anyone kindly tell me what to do?’
I think I might disagree with some of your analysis. Are the figures solid?
I think other website proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and great user pleasant style and design .