Building an economic floor under the poor

Posted on November 4, 2011 in Social Security Debates

Source: — Authors: – opinion/editorialopinion
Published On Thu Nov 03 2011.   By Carol Goar, Editorial Board

At the lowest point of the last recession, the United Nations called for the creation of a worldwide social protection floor to prevent the poor from falling into deeper deprivation.

It asked Michelle Bachelet, former president of Chile, to head a nine-member panel charged with turning the concept into a workable plan. And it appointed two UN agencies, the International Labour Organization and the World Health Organization, to do the legwork.

The panel has now completed its report, Social Protection Floor for a Fair and Inclusive Globalization. It intends to present it to the G20 leaders at their summit in Cannes this week, urging them to set floor levels of social protection for the vulnerable in their own countries and help the world’s neediest nations take the first steps.

The report comes an opportune time. As world leaders struggle to contain the Greek debt crisis, recapitalize Europe’s banks, keep credit flowing, stabilize global markets and head off another financial meltdown, almost no one is talking about the human cost of the upheaval. “People everywhere are anxious about the future, frustrated about the economy and upset with leaders,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said. “Achieving social protection for all is critical to building fairer, more inclusive and more equitable societies.”

It is unlikely the plan will get a blanket endorsement from the G20. It runs counter to the direction of government policy in countries such as Canada, the United States, Britain and Japan. But it does have two strong backers — French President Nicolas Sarkozy, host of this week’s summit, and Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff have publicly welcomed the initiative.

A preliminary draft of the report was welcomed by the G20 labour ministers when they met in Paris in September.

Bachelet, who headed the Chilean government from 2006 to 2010, insists that establishing a floor level of social protection is feasible. She did it in her own country at a time of economic turbulence and political upheaval. She put in place free health care for seniors, free distribution of the “morning-after pill” to women and girls over 14, education and pension reform, comprehensive social services for preschool children from poor families, as well as two new subways lines in Santiago and pay-equity legislation. It didn’t bankrupt the treasury. Nor did it destroy her political career. She left office with an 84 per cent approval rating. (The Chilean constitution does not allow a president to serve two consecutive terms.)

“Extending social protection is a win-win investment that pays off both in the short term given its effects as a macroeconomic stabilizer, but also in the long term due to the impacts on human development and productivity,” the 60 year-old pediatrician said.

The report does not prescribe a one-size-fits-all approach or a universal standard. It recommends that each country move at its own pace, creating social floors that reflect its needs, priorities and fiscal capacity. But it does suggest four key principles:

• Build on what already exists. Plug holes, shore up weaknesses, coordinate disjointed health, housing, nutrition, education, employment and retirement support programs so people don’t fall through the cracks.

• Aim to move people from income support to opportunities for decent employment or entrepreneurship.

• Ensure that non-government groups are fully involved in setting the social protection floors and delivering the benefits and services.

• Anchor the process in sustainable domestic funding sources; revenues that will be there regardless of external circumstances. Otherwise, the floors will collapse, undermining public trust.

It is possible Bachelet’s report will be pushed aside by the European debt crisis or shelved for further study.

That would kill the hopes of the millions who haven’t recovered from the last recession and know they will hit hardest by the economic upheaval to come.

<–goar-building-an-economic-floor-under-the-poor >

Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted on Friday, November 4th, 2011 at 10:42 pm and is filed under Social Security Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

2 Responses to “Building an economic floor under the poor”

  1. Samantha Gaudette says:

    After reading this article, I must say I was pleased to see an initiative being taken to mend this economic problem with long-term intent, as opposed to using a temporary band-aid solution. I agree that by laying down an “economic floor” we will be able to prevent this problem from developing further, while working on finalizing a solution all together. Although it may seem like these social programs only provide the bare minimum, they can take a huge weight off of those in need. For example, comprehensive social services for preschool children from poor families may be insignificant to someone who is financially stable, but for those who are living in proverty it makes a huges difference.

    If I were to be hesitant on anything it would be the question of finances. Rebuilding the economy will be a quick or cheap fix. What would incline people to support something financially that may not be effective in the end? However, pushing this initiative aside for the Europe debt crisis only allows more time for our economy to fall further into poverty. In my opinion we should begin where there is less damage and stabilize that situation first. By setting floor levels of social protection for the vulnerable we will be able to prevent these current issues from happening in the future.

    Implementing more social services will create a positive type of growth in the economy where individuals suffering from poverty will be enabled to establish more stable lifestyles. I believe we all have to get on the same page with both the positive and negative aspects to this potential solution. By remaining split on this topic we will just further prolong the possibility of the issue being permanently eliminated. The past cannot be changed, but by using it as a way of future prevention (and recognizing the detrimental effect this will continue to have on the economy) I believe this article outlines a great way to begin a positive change.

  2. Amanda F says:

    I think this report could be very valuable in today’s society. Bachelet has proven that things can improve with government funded social supports without ruining the governments bottom line. The fact that this report may be contradictory to the direction of government policy in Canada may be a good thing. Clearly the policies in place now aren’t producing the changes required for serve society so a change may be exactly what is needed, here in Canada and elsewhere as well.

    The premise of the report regarding the establishment of floor limits and starting with the neediest countries is a brilliant idea. Bachelet’s have demonstrated effectively how to improve the standard of living for those who struggle.

    No one expects all the world’s problems to be solved overnight but this report and Bachelet’s accomplishments in her own country have given societies an excellent place to start.


Leave a Reply