A new health-care model with premiers in the lead

Posted on January 22, 2013 in Health Delivery System

—

TheStar.com – canada/politics
January 20, 2013.     Tim Harper, National Affairs Columnist

It’s been 13 months since Jim Flaherty winged his way to the west coast, chowed down on some beef tenderloin with his provincial counterparts, then dropped his Victoria bombshell over lunch the next day.

Here’s your health-care funding until 2016-17, the federal finance minister said, six per cent increases until then, followed by increases tied to economic growth plus inflation. How it is spent is up to you.

There is nothing to negotiate, now where’s my hat, what’s my hurry?

A stunned Dwight Duncan, now the outgoing finance minister of Ontario, called the move by Ottawa a “frontal attack” on health care in Canada and said Flaherty had given the provinces a pre-Christmas lump of coal.

But lo and behold, after all the bluster, the cries that Ottawa had abdicated its health-care leadership duty, that we would see a “patchwork quilt” of different health-care systems in different provinces, the first step toward health-care reform has been cobbled together by the provinces.

A task force led by Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall and Prince Edward Island Premier Robert Ghiz had found a way to save, they say, $100 million with a bulk buy of six generic drugs in this country.

A small first step, the two men say, and more savings will be coming.

But beyond $100 million in drug costs savings, this was also a first step in health-care delivery in this country without the federal government leading the way.

It’s an act of ownership in the health-care system by those who deliver the care, the provinces.

Now Ottawa appears ready to piggyback on this drug deal after, as Ghiz puts it, the provinces did the “heavy lifting.”

There will be more, Ghiz has promised, with a meeting of health ministers tentatively set for March. This could include extending the bulk buying to brand name drugs and bulk buying of medical equipment. And they may also move on unnecessary medical testing.

But haven’t they just shown they can work without Ottawa; that they are doing exactly what Ottawa asked?

“We came together because we were ignored when it came to sitting down and negotiating future health-care programs with the federal government,” Ghiz said. “We were given a unilateral deal.

“Of course we want the feds at the table. We need them at the table when it comes to looking at new national programs or changing programs.

“The big reason we want to have the feds at the table — they have dollars. I am willing to listen to their suggestions if they are willing to put dollars on the table.”

The federal strategy was a major break with health-care delivery in this country carved out over almost five decades.

Until this government provided the no-strings-attached funding, previous federal governments had used the power of the purse to force recalcitrant provinces back into line if they strayed from the tenets of the Canada Health Act.

The battles between federal Liberal governments and Alberta under Ralph Klein are part of political lore in this country.

During one battle, Klein famously accused the Liberal health minister of the day, Allan Rock, of a “drive-by smear” after a Calgary speech.

Klein kept pushing the private care envelope. Ottawa kept threatening to cut funding.

Now Stephen Harper is saying to the premiers — go ahead, innovate and reform.

Harper told the CBC’s Peter Mansbridge, shortly after the Flaherty deal was sealed, that he was no longer going to blame the provinces for health-care problems or lead on innovation from the national capital.

“I think that’s been a better method than in the past trying to pretend there is some overarching national standards,’’ he said, “and then wave the finger at them for perceived slights. I don’t think that’s been effective.’’

If nothing else, Harper pushed health-care battles off the front burner in this country.

There is nothing — not even moral imperative — that forces provinces to put these drug savings back into health care, but with health care eating up to 40 per cent of some provincial budgets, it is almost certain that’s where the bulk of the financial savings will go, Ghiz says.

Ottawa may yet have to take a lead when it comes to health-care reform or innovation.

But once Harper tossed the ball into the provincial court, the premiers really had no choice but to get this done themselves, and, so far, they are getting it done.

< http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1317603–tim-harper-a-new-health-care-model-with-premiers-in-the-lead >

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 22nd, 2013 at 10:55 am and is filed under Health Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

349 Responses to “A new health-care model with premiers in the lead”

  1. What made you first develop an interest in this topic?

  2. Great resources and tips for families here.

  3. I’m so happy to read this. This is the type of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that’s at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this best doc.

  4. This is the wave – the big wave.

  5. I like to spend my free time by scaning various internet recourses. Today I came across your site and I found it is as one of the best free resources available! Well done! Keep on this quality!

  6. sabong67 says:

    I like your quality that you put into your writing . Please do continue with more like this.

  7. Developing a framework is important.

  8. Tips and tools you offer are so helpful to agencies in our community.

  9. The clarity in your post is just nice and I can tell you are an expert in the subject matter.

  10. bongdalu says:

    This is something that will need all of our combined efforts to address.

  11. That is really fascinating, You’re an excessively skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to in the hunt for extra of your magnificent post. Additionally, I’ve shared your website in my social networks!

  12. I have been curious about these trends, and you have really helped me. I have just told a few of my friends about this on FaceBook and they love your content just as much as I do.

  13. You are one talented writer thank you for the post.

  14. bongdalu369 says:

    I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing issues with your site. It appears as though some of the written text on your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before. Appreciate it

  15. I think I might disagree with some of your analysis. Are the figures solid?

  16. Pretty impressive article. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your opinions. Any way I’ll be coming back and I hope you post again soon.

  17. I had highly recommend this blog to my good friend, it’s so good

  18. I am glad to talk with you and you give me great help

  19. I encountered your site after doing a search for new contesting using Google, and decided to stick around and read more of your articles. Thanks for posting, I have your site bookmarked now.

  20. Keep it up!. I usually don’t post in Blogs but your blog forced me to, amazing work.. beautiful A rise in An increase in An increase in.

« Older Comments | Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply