3 graphs that show Canada’s deep and persistent wealth inequality
PressProgress.ca –
Sept. 11, 2014. By PressProgress
Wealth in Canada is concentrated heavily in the top 10% — with the bottom 30% of Canadians accounting for less than 1% of all wealth and the bottom half accounting for less than 6%, a new study has found.
The analysis, conducted by the Broadbent Institute, is based on custom Statistics Canada data from the agency’s Survey of Financial Security, a snapshot of the distribution of assets, debts and net worth of Canadians.
The top 10% of Canadians accounted for almost half (47.9%) of all wealth in 2012. This group saw their median net worth rise by 41.9% since 2005 (to $2.1 million). Compare this to a 150% drop in the median net worth of the bottom 10% (to negative $5,100).
Here’s what Canada’s wealth inequality looks like in three graphs:
Distribution of wealth in Canada by decile, 2012
http://www.pressprogress.ca/sites/default/files/screen_shot_2014-09-10_at_10.54.57_pm_1.png
The extent on Canada’s wealth inequality problem is even more stark when you exclude pensions and look at financial assets: the top 10% held almost $6 in every $10 (59.6%) of financial assets, more than the bottom 90% combined.
Distribution of financial assets (excluding pensions) by decile, 2012
http://www.pressprogress.ca/sites/default/files/screen_shot_2014-09-10_at_10.55.10_pm.png
Some provinces are even more unequal than others. The concentration of wealth for the top 10% was highest in British Columbia at 56.2% and lowest in Atlantic Canada (31.7%) and Quebec (43.4%). The bottom half of the population also held the least amount of wealth in BC — just 3.1%, compared to 7% in Quebec and 11% in Atlantic Canada.
Share of wealth for wealthiest 10% versus bottom half of Canadians, 2012
http://www.pressprogress.ca/sites/default/files/screen_shot_2014-09-10_at_10.55.37_pm.png
Photo: Broadbent Institute.
< http://www.pressprogress.ca/en/post/3-graphs-show-canadas-deep-and-persistent-wealth-inequality >
Tags: economy, featured, ideology, jurisdiction, participation, poverty, standard of living, tax
This entry was posted on Thursday, September 11th, 2014 at 1:21 pm and is filed under Equality Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Leave a Reply