Workers didn’t cause this inflation. And they shouldn’t have to pay for it

Posted on May 29, 2022 in Debates

Source: — Authors: – Business/Opinion
Sat., May 28, 2022.   By Jim Stanford, Contributing Columnist

Workers lost more than three per cent of their real purchasing power in the past year alone. If wages aren’t lifted soon, they will experience a permanent reduction in their living standard,  writes Jim Stanford.

There’s a painful contrast in the latest Statistics Canada data on prices and wages. Average consumer prices increased 6.8 per cent over the past year — the fastest in more than 30 years. In contrast, average hourly wages grew 3.3 per cent in the same period. You don’t need an economist to see what this means: prices are growing twice as fast as wages.

That widening gap means real (inflation-adjusted) compensation for Canadian workers is shrinking — and quickly. On average, workers lost more than three per cent of their real purchasing power in the past year alone, with more to come.

Public sector workers face draconian pay caps that amplify the losses from inflation. For example, 270,000 public sector workers in Ontario have had pay rises capped at one per cent by the Ford government since 2019. As compensation for their bravery and dedication during the pandemic, their real wages will be cut 5.5 per cent this year alone.

Other governments are imposing only slightly less draconian real wage cuts on their public servants. The federal government is offering its staff an average 1.7 per cent per year over four years. Other provinces are capping pay rises well below labour market averages, and even farther behind inflation.

No one can credibly argue the current inflation was caused by workers. Wages have lagged well behind prices since mid-2020, and workers’ share of GDP is shrinking as prices surge. No, this inflation was clearly caused by supply chain disruptions (like semiconductors and cars), the housing bubble, and the energy price shock following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Those factors will likely moderate in coming months: real estate prices, for example, are already falling. Higher interest rates will cut deeply into domestic spending.

But even if inflation subsides, what will happen to workers’ wages in the meantime? If wages aren’t lifted, and quickly, workers will experience a permanent reduction in their living standards as a legacy of inflation they didn’t cause — but which enriched others (from petroleum giants to housing developers to grocery chains).

That’s morally reprehensible, and economically damaging. It causes household financial fragility, greater inequality, and conflictual labour relations (already visible in Ontario’s construction strikes).

Employers, whether public or private, can certainly afford to boost wages in line with prices. Government revenues are increasing lock step with inflation; that’s why budget balances, both federally and provincially, are much stronger than anticipated. Governments have plenty of room to increase wages at the same pace.

Private sector employers, too, are reaping wider profit margins as consumers shell out for higher prices. Wholesale margins have grown more than twice as fast as overall inflation, and pre-tax corporate profits have reached their largest share of revenues in over a decade this year as inflation took off.

It’s clear the current situation is a case of profit-price inflation, not wage-price inflation. Suppressing wages doesn’t address the cause of the problem, and will have no value curing it.

It is possible to protect workers against inflation, without causing more inflation. Unit labour costs grow more slowly than wages (thanks to productivity growth). And labour costs make up only one-third of direct production costs, on average, across all industries. So honest businesses only need to increase prices one-third as fast as wages while still preserving their (already-swollen) profits.

So long as the actual causes of inflation are addressed (by fixing supply chains, energy prices, and housing), inflation would then decelerate, even as wages keep up. Contingent wage protections (like cost-of-living adjustments) would also maintain the purchasing value of wages, without prompting higher inflation.

Meanwhile, governments could act to directly bring down some prices: such as child care; health, dental, and drug costs; transit fares; and even housing (through expanded nonmarket housing construction). To the limited extent that domestic demand pressures are reinforcing higher prices, it is better to use more focused and fair contractionary measures to dampen spending. The federal NDP’s proposal to lift taxes on petroleum companies, and recycle revenues to enhanced social benefits, would be neutral in its effect on inflation, while helping protect the hardest-hit households.

Whether public sector or private, workers should reject the permanent reduction in real wages their employers are demanding. Workers didn’t cause this inflation. And they shouldn’t have to pay for it.

Jim Stanford is a freelance contributing columnist for the Star, based in Vancouver. He is Economist and Director of the Centre for Future Work, a labour economics research institute with operations in Canada and Australia.

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 29th, 2022 at 12:41 pm and is filed under Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply