Ontario ends onerous reviews for disabled people on welfare

Posted on in Social Security Delivery System

TheStar.com – News/GTA – Social Services Minister introduces more streamlined approach to make it easier for those with disabilities to continue receiving benefits.
April 5, 2017.   By 

Two years after the Star highlighted problems with Ontario’s onerous and intimidating medical review process for disabled people on welfare, Social Services Minister Helena Jaczek has introduced a more simple and streamlined approach.

Beginning this month, those whose medical conditions have not improved will no longer be required to fill out the same forms they completed for their initial application for benefits under the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP).

“Our government is committed to a more client-friendly and efficient adjudication process,” Jaczek said Wednesday. “These changes will reduce the burden on clients, health care professionals, stakeholders and staff, while maintaining a process that is fair and accountable.”

The new, simplified medical review package is focused solely on determining whether the medical condition that caused the person to require support in the first place has improved.

If there is no improvement, or expected improvement, a statement from the patient’s health care provider will suffice, cutting the need for costly medical tests and referrals to specialists that had been required in the past.

“Only in cases where improvement is reported or prognosis is unknown, will the health care professional be asked to provide further information,” says an advisory posted on the social services ministry website.

ODSP recipient Kimberly Sturge, 31, says she is “relieved” she won’t have to endure another medical review under the old system.

The Toronto single mother, who developed severe vertigo, an anxiety disorder and chronic depression in 2012 after a head injury left her unable to continue working as a legal assistant, suffered a mental-health set-back when her ODSP medical review was rejected twice in 2014.

“I no longer feel anxious about my next review in two years,” she said Wednesday. “It makes me feel good to have been able to tell my story and make a difference.”

Legal clinic case workers, who say the majority of their work involves helping people navigate access to ODSP benefits, were pleased by the government’s willingness to address the long-standing issue.

“This is the first minister who has acknowledged there was a problem with how they are adjudicating disability,” said Mary Marrone, legal director of the Income Security Advocacy Centre, a legal aid clinic that advocates on behalf of people on social assistance.

“The new forms are much simpler and focus on the legal test, which is: Has the client improved?” said Marrone, who has been pressing the government to reform the process since 2010.

“The process is clear, so doctors know why they are filling out these forms and there isn’t the same demand for massive amounts of information,” she added.

Due to rising ODSP caseloads, a backlog of more than 60,000 medical reviews prompted the province in the spring of 2015 to more than triple the number of forms issued each month, from 600 to 1,900. An outcry by legal clinics and medical professionals, highlighted by the Star, prompted Jaczek to re-examine the process.

“People, especially with mental health issues, find (the current process) particularly difficult and intimidating,” Jaczek told the Star a year ago when she struck a working group of medical professionals, social workers, lawyers and community advocates to solve the problem.

“What we’re trying to do is lessen the burden on families and individuals and the health care providers and the legal clinics… who often end up appealing decisions made,” Jaczek said at the time.

Almost one-third of about 350,000 households with a person receiving support under the program have disabilities that are expected to improve such as cancer, depression or an addiction. As a result, the government conducts medical reviews every two to five years to see if the person is still legally eligible for support.

Until now, the 21-page review form doctors and other health care providers were required to complete was the same one they fill out when patients first apply for benefits.

Doctors said it is costly for the medical system to repeat tests they don’t believe are necessary. And legal clinics say appeals for clients who have been denied benefits are a waste of time and money, as half of the cases are upheld.

Social workers say the small number of people on ODSP who are difficult to reach due to homelessness or a medical condition that makes it hard for them to keep appointments, risk being cut off if they don’t complete the forms.

Dr. Fatima Uddin, who works at the Regent Park Community Health Clinic, says many of her patients rely on ODSP and are overwhelmed by the medical review process.

“It is quite stressful for patients who have already been approved for ODSP to go through that harrowing process all over again just to prove they continue to be as unwell as they were before,” she said.

“The new process is simple, efficient and reduces a lot of the stress for patients and (medical) providers,” Uddin said. “And it is going to save the health care and social service system a lot of unnecessary costs.”


Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 6th, 2017 at 1:06 pm and is filed under Social Security Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Ontario ends onerous reviews for disabled people on welfare”

  1. bernard louis liberto says:

    Dear sirs and madams:
    as a person whom has been estroyed by iilealg usages of the mental health porocesses a;oying to ad infintum attacks by opoicing and staging due certain foundational relief i find this funny to day that i should find this herein internet descripitonf ocivility in processes, a concern…ruthless arrewsts whereby conspiuracies of mind agains tothers are not regarded esxotrions pocie extortions whereby prejudices formely beheld psartiucalirit=y in light of bewhldings by ocie that punish if anyone tries to enter courts agains =t them upuish, and surround and contrive reason to adminsiter confinements of interminable or indefinte entrap nothing to it for th esystematic regiments involved in repeation coursing of saurvey they daily ioerform with moitant expierneces and deices of methdoligies tulized expertly without the conset of the law defy, it, UN laws, and slavery laws contiued. \i find this dovucemnt laughable and the power word is sickenly=gly stake hoders a term i guess of capssions, stakes through the vbody the ways of old english cast system come to north maerica ewwere not welcome as the menatal health act from the birish war measures act confing any whom opoed joining th econsctions to war…many did not and many were kept in jail indefinitely and contiun=ed becuase of the not withstanding clause entered into by the old guard conswervative ruined those adherences to free minds charter of freedom sof rights of Cnada…I find it typical of biritsh systematics utilized that democracy of civility should have been ever considered outside the civil orcesses of courts decisons of that vilicity undiecussed wth n that for=orum against the goverment ans this inside document today by me found is present and served adiinstrations upn the weak the sick the il a slavery law not to burden and fertter ill annoy anyone…so what ever adehrences Cnada and the forces of jus=rusdictions mainatian a distrucst of any disabled is laughable and sadisitic administrations earning a living fomr th eweakm, there in lay the stake holders true worth a mere mercenaris orgaizations that has turned into usage usury slavery of peolke experimentations and confined…I think yourselves shold all find lawyers…for th ejustice pursuits of many will not be side trakced by teh diffendece to the alws by administrations parlances of conveniences to obstruct with justice utili\zeing these comuncaes perusasions…yourds under god, bernard luis lberto, a imposed entrap and totured madically perosn lvng in north maerica Cnada…a citizen of north maerica that regrads democracy and civility wrth defending at all cost, even my life…go ae=head challenge me?! no i do not htink that this is described herin becaue yourselves have previously contrived a cirminatliy or othewise incriminates =d to diggreesive of my earlier attepts to as=ccess justice not at all, in fact this is common practice foryur adminsitrations and will motion a laws be pased that you stop this type of persuasion firmly defned unde the law a bu-ill of protections not of govenment but of and for the citizens..of Canda and north amerfa as influncing other naitons to perform this is soicalism, bluni-t outright socialsim and scentific socialsl casuisties…bernard louis lberto


Leave a Reply