OCUFA analysis of the Drummond Report: all cuts, no substance
Posted on February 24, 2012 in Education Delivery System
Source: OCUFA — Authors: Editor
ocufa.on.ca – Volume 6, Issue 5
February 23, 2012. Editor
After reviewing the final report of the Commission on the Reform of Ontario’s Public Services, faculty and academic librarians are unimpressed. Drummond has provided Ontario with a poor plan for ‘transforming’ our public services, and is essentially a plan for huge cuts to public spending hiding behind a screen of poorly costed and ill-considered recommendations for change. In particular, the report:
- Is based on a variety of questionable economic assumptions, predictions and forecasts;
- Is first and foremost a plan for significant cuts to spending, including university funding;
- Sets the stage for hard-bargaining throughout the broader public service;
- Proposes a funding framework for higher education that does not keep pace with inflation or enrolment, and as the paper admits, will lead to a decline in quality;
- Provides recommendations for generating efficiency and savings in the higher education sector, with no evidence of how this will happen or how much it will save;
- Proposes shifting educational cost onto the backs of students and their families; and
- Relies on third-party policy entrepreneurs for research, much of which is incorrect.
In short, this is not the way forward for Ontario. The downturn-as-justification-for-cuts scenario is an old one, and it has been rejected by the public before. It is now critical that the Government of Ontario pursue an alternative strategy that takes into account the needs and concerns of Ontarians – a strategy that protects education, promotes effective economic and social development, and rejects the logic of austerity.
Download the OCUFA Analysis
Reality Check: The Drummond Report is a cut any way you slice it
The Drummond Report claims that it “protects annual growth in post-secondary funding at a time when many other public services will be rationalized.” True, it does recommend that postsecondary expenditures continue to increase by 1.5 per cent per year. But a quick look at the data reveals the truth: Drummond actually recommending a severe cut to the operating budgets of our institutions.
On the commission’s own assumptions and proposals – 1.7 per cent annual enrolment growth, 1.9 per cent annual inflation, and 1.5 per cent annual increases in post-secondary funding – per student funding will decline by 12 per cent between now and 2017-18.
If university funding is allocated according to the enrolment balance of college, undergraduate and graduate students who are eligible for funding, inflation-adjusted provincial funding per college student could fall by $790, and per undergraduate student could decline by almost $940. For graduate students, the reduction could be $2,280.
You can call a cut an increase, Mr. Drummond, but you can’t hide the data.
Source: Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities for enrolment data; Ministry of Finance for Expenditure Estimates.
< http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=ca9b5c14da55e36f1328eb0f1&id=4089f439c9 >
Tags: budget, economy, ideology, standard of living, youth
This entry was posted on Friday, February 24th, 2012 at 9:50 am and is filed under Education Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
392 Responses to “OCUFA analysis of the Drummond Report: all cuts, no substance”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
I’m impressed, I need to say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educational and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head.
Glad to be one of several visitors on this awful internet site : D.
whoah this weblog is great i really like studying your articles. Stay up the great work! You already know, lots of persons are looking round for this information, you can aid them greatly.
I was referred to this web site by my cousin. I’m not sure who has written this post, but you’ve really identified my problem. You’re wonderful! Thanks!
I am glad to be a visitor on this website!, regards for this rare information!
While this issue can vexed most people, my thought is that there has to be a middle or common ground that we all can find. I do value that you’ve added pertinent and sound commentary here though. Thank you!
I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.
Regards for helping out, superb info.
When are you going to post again? You really entertain me!
Public policy is key here, and our states need to develop some strategies – – soon.
When we look at these issues, we know that they are the key ones for our time.
it is a really nice point of view. I usually meet people who rather say what they suppose others want to hear. Good and well written! I will come back to your site for sure!
Glad to be one of many visitants on this amazing site : D.
Some genuinely choice content on this site, bookmarked .
Great blog here! Also your site loads up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol
Only a smiling visitor here to share the love (:, btw outstanding style and design .
Its just like you read my thoughts! It’s like reading about my family.
This is my first time i visit here. I found so many helpful stuff in your website especially its discussion. From the tons of responses on your posts, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the excellent work
I have to disagree with most of the comments here, but maybe I’m just a contrarian.
Nice blog. Could someone with little experience do it, and add updates without messing it up? Good information on here, very informative.