New support for teens in foster care is a smart move
TheStar.com – Opinion/Edirorials – The province of Ontario will now support kids in foster care who are still in high school until they are 21.
Oct 04 2015. Editorial
On Lindsay’s 18th birthday she woke up in her foster care home and promptly moved to a student rooming house. That’s because under policy set by the Ontario government, the payments her foster care family received to support her dried up the moment she turned 18. It didn’t matter that she was still in Grade 12.Understandably, her grades dropped and she didn’t graduate from Grade 12 that year.
Lindsay is just one example of what happens to kids in foster care when they are arbitrarily cut off from the foster families who have been caring for them. But as of this past week that won’t happen to teens like Lindsay anymore. Under smart and long-overdue policy changes, funding to foster families will continue until Crown wards who are still in high school turn 21.
That is good news for the 3,400 young people between 18 and 21 who could be eligible for the extra support. They are often still in high school when they reach 18 because of the emotional and physical disruptions they have faced in their lives.
In fact, as reported by the Star’s Laurie Monsebraaten, just 46 per cent of Ontario children in foster care and group homes complete high school, compared to about 84 per cent of their peers with permanent families. As a result, they are more likely as adults to be poor, homeless, suffer mental health problems and be involved in the criminal justice system.
Four other policy changes announced by Children and Youth Services Minister Tracy MacCharles should also make the lives of Ontario’s 64,00 Crown wards easier.
To help more of these young people find permanent families, the province announced it will spend $4.9 million over three years to support adoption recruiters.
As well, subsidies available to families who adopt kids between the ages of 10 and 18 will now be available for those aged 8 to 21. Further, those subsidies will be increased to $12,400 from $11,400 per child, while the income threshold for receiving them will rise to $93,700 from $85,000.
These are both welcome changes for the kids and money-saving moves for the province. Subsidies for adoptive families amount to only about 60 per cent of the average cost that Children’s Aid Societies pay foster parents in Ontario. As well, research shows that children and teens who grow up in permanent homes are more likely to graduate from high school, hold a job and contribute to their communities.
It’s not just the right thing for the province to give these kids a helping hand. It’s a fiscally prudent move that will make a big difference in their lives as they become adults.
< http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2015/10/04/new-support-for-teens-in-foster-care-is-a-smart-move-editorial.html >
Tags: budget, child care, homelessness, ideology, mental Health, standard of living, youth
This entry was posted on Sunday, October 4th, 2015 at 1:43 pm and is filed under Child & Family Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
One Response to “New support for teens in foster care is a smart move”
|
Leave a Reply
First picking this posting I knew teens in foster care need a lot more support, I really believe Canada’s whole welfare system needs changing. I myself (as someone who before social work) as someone who has completed her diploma in Child and Youth Worker, has had a friend who’s been in the system, knows that we have a large number of children in the foster care system. I was very pleased that this was something, if even for a brief moment; the article didn’t neglect to not talk about. This is something I think that isn’t talked about enough because it is another aspect of our foster and, children’s aid system that is not working to its full potential. These children going into the foster system learn fast that there is no sense of security. They never know if they will be staying with a family, or sometimes struggle to why they were taken away. They struggle sometimes because when you’ve been in a setting that isn’t good for you for most of your life; it gets harder for the youth to see that it is not normal or acceptable. Yes I agree putting more money in to support for foster families as the amount they get is extremely hard to provide the same opportunities many other middle class families would want to give their own children. I think putting money alone will not fix the problem of the foster system entirely; perhaps Canada should be looking at the biggest population of children/youth in the system, which are Aboriginal children. We need to look at why we are taking such a large amount of children of a system, a system that is already putting youth at a disadvantage, were Aboriginal children are already at a disadvantage in Canada. It extremely upsetting to me that our country thinks it’s okay to take children (all races of children) out of their homes, put them through having no security, and when their 18 casting them out without looking at what they caused in that child. We are expecting them to take care of themselves, when we as a country did not take care of them.