Modest new thinking on health care

Posted on September 24, 2011 in Health Debates

Source: — Authors:

TheStar.com – opinion/editorialopinion
Published On Thu Sep 22 2011.   By Carol Goar, Editorial Board

If health means shorter waits for surgery, more nursing homes, more MRI machines and more pharmaceuticals, the fact that all three provincial parties are pledging to increase medical spending should ease voters’ fears.

If health means having enough to eat, a decent place to live, safe drinking water, an income that allows wholesome choices, a non-toxic environment and the opportunity to be a productive member of society, medical spending is the wrong yardstick.

Ontario does a relatively good job of patching people up after they get sick. If does a relatively poor job of keeping people — especially disadvantaged people — out of hospitals and long-term care institutions.

It is no coincidence that the highest morbidity rates in the province are among the working poor, social assistance recipients, people with disabilities and mental disorders and members of First Nations. And it has long been clear that conventional medicine — delivered in doctors’ offices, hospitals and operating rooms — doesn’t have an answer to this problem.

All three political parties recognize that it is short-sighted to keep putting ever-larger larger amounts of public money into the health-care system to make incremental improvements in existing services, when most Ontarians want to stay healthy and age at home.

That is a welcome change. Political leaders used to demonstrate their devotion to public health care solely by the size of their dollar commitment.

What isn’t changing as much — although there are promising signs — is the way health dollars are spent.

What is barely changing at all is the reluctance of Ontario’s politicians to address the factors that condemn 412,000 children in this province — half of them in Toronto — to unhealthy choices, preventable diseases and foreshortened lives.

None of the parties is proposing to raise welfare rates ($592 per month for an individual, $1,014 per month for a single mother raising a child).

They’ve all said no to a nutrition supplement ($100 a month) proposed by public health officials, led by Dr. David McKeown, Toronto’s medical officer of health.

One party — the NDP — supports a provincial housing benefit ($100 a month for Ontarians who spend more than half of their income on rent). The Liberals are prepared to “consider” the idea, but they’ve been considering various housing proposals for the last eight years without acting.

Only the New Democrats would raise Ontario’s minimum wage (to $11 from $10.25).

On the positive side, all three parties have begun to shed their hospital-centric view of health-care.

The Conservatives are pledging to “increase investments in home care” (no dollar figure provided) and ensure that mental health doesn’t get lost in the system.

The Liberals are proposing to help seniors retrofit their homes with ramps, walk-in shower stalls and mechanical lifts (a $1,500 tax credit); revive doctors’ house calls; offer family caregivers up to eight weeks of paid leave (if they can get Ottawa to cover the cost) and set a goal of reducing childhood obesity by 20 per cent within five years.

The New Democrats are promising to invest 1 million hours in home care, open 50 new community health-care clinics, help seniors stay in their homes by hiring housekeepers to help them with laundry, meal preparation and cleaning; and make phys-ed mandatory in high school.

None of these proposals is bold. No party proposes a major reallocation of health-care funds. No leader is offering to tackle Ontario’s health inequities.

< http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1058314–goar-modest-new-thinking-on-health-care >

online pharmacy https://www.lookyoungclinicdelhi.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/cytotec.html with best prices today in the USA
online pharmacy buy ventolin online no prescription pharmacy

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Saturday, September 24th, 2011 at 1:21 pm and is filed under Health Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

68 Responses to “Modest new thinking on health care”

  1. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your fantastic post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!

  2. Thanks for another great post. Where else may anybody get that type of info in such an ideal way of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I’m at the search for such information.

  3. I loved your idea there, I tell you blogs are so exciting sometimes like looking into people’s private life’s and work. Every new remark wonderful in its own right.

  4. aizen power says:

    Have you always been concerned about these issues?

  5. Certainly. And I have faced it. Let’s discuss this question. Here or in PM.

  6. nicee content keep writing

  7. 789p says:

    Easily, the post is really the greatest on this laudable topic. I concur with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your future updates. Saying thank will not just be sufficient, for the wonderful c lucidity in your writing. I will instantly grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Solid work and much success in your business enterprise!

  8. Thanks , I’ve recently been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far. But, what concerning the bottom line? Are you certain concerning the source?

  9. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!

  10. 13L GAME says:

    Great post. Just a heads up – I am running Ubuntu with the beta of Firefox and the navigation of your blog is kind of broken for me.

  11. Our family had similar issues, thanks.

  12. Advanced reading here!

  13. This website has lots of really useful stuff on it. Thanks for informing me.

  14. Very often I go to see this blog. It very much is pleasant to me. Thanks the author

  15. XOSO66 says:

    Nice piece of info! May I reference part of this on my blog if I post a backlink to this webpage? Thx.

  16. I really believe you will do well in the future I appreciate everything you have added to my knowledge base.

  17. Hello this is kinda of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

  18. Abnormal this put up is totaly unrelated to what I was searching google for, but it surely used to be listed at the first page. I suppose your doing one thing proper if Google likes you adequate to place you at the first page of a non similar search.

  19. This is a great blog. Thank you for the very informative post.

  20. Might we expect to see more of these same problems in the future?

« Older Comments | Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply