Monday’s premiers’ conference marked the opening round in what promises to be intense federal-provincial negotiations over pharmacare.
In one corner are the provinces — jealous of their prerogatives and deeply suspicious of Ottawa.
In the other is the federal Liberal minority government — desperate for a political win and reliant on support from either the New Democrats or the Bloc Québécois.
At stake is the boldest health care idea since medicare was instituted in 1968 — a plan to provide all Canadians with cheap, publicly funded prescription drug coverage.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberals promised universal pharmacare in the last election campaign. That in itself is not new. The Liberals have been promising pharmacare since 1997.
What is different now is that Trudeau’s government holds only a minority of seats in the Commons. That makes it dependent on the good will of either the NDP or the Bloc.
The NDP has made it clear that its support is dependent on the government implementing national, universal pharmacare. The Bloc I shall get to later.
The Liberals have no good reason to delay. An advisory panel led by former Ontario health minister Eric Hoskins has provided them with a blueprint for implementing pharmacare. The government has pledged to use this blueprint as a basis for its plans.
Indeed, it has already set aside money for a new Canadian Drug Agency to lay the groundwork for pharmacare, as recommended by the Hoskins panel.
And then there are the premiers.
The premiers are not necessarily opposed to pharmacare. In fact, their Council of the Federation has been toying with aspects of the idea since 2010.
Every province operates some form of public drug plan for seniors and the poor. All premiers would be pleased to have Ottawa take on part of that financial burden.
But they don’t want to be hosed again, as many feel they were with medicare.
That worthy social program was sold to the provinces as one in which Ottawa would pick up half the costs. But by the late ’70s, the federal government had changed its mind. It began to unilaterally roll back its cash contributions, leaving the provinces to make up the difference.
That’s why the premiers insist that any national pharmacare scheme must have “adequate and sustained” federal funding.
Many would prefer to get the money with no strings attached. In some cases, as British Columbia Premier John Horgan noted Monday, it’s because they want to beef up existing provincial drug programs. In others, as Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister noted, it’s because they have different health-care priorities.
To that end, all premiers have seized on two principles of federal-provincial funding that Ottawa, unwisely, agreed to 15 years ago during another intense round of negotiations over health care.
The first was the principle of asymmetrical federalism. It stated that, because Quebec was different, it could opt out of any future federal-provincial shared-cost programs but still get Ottawa’s money.
The second was the principle of provincial equality. It stated that, because all provinces are equal, any of them could get the same deal as Quebec.
The effect of the two principles combined has been to make it near impossible for Ottawa to set national standards for new social programs.
More specifically, it makes the creation of a national, universal, public pharmacare plan — that treats all Canadians the same no matter where they live — extraordinarily difficult.
Theoretically, Ottawa could back away from the two principles. Theoretically, it could follow the advice of the Hoskins panel and fund pharmacare only in those provinces that have agreed to abide by broad national standards. Theoretically, the Liberals could take on Quebec Premier François Legault.
But in practice, the chance of such a thing happening is next to zero. First, it would make the Trudeau government’s situation in the Commons vis-à-vis the Bloc more precarious. More importantly, it would not play well among Quebec voters the Liberals hope to attract in the next election.
The question now is whether the Trudeau government can finesse all of this and manage to negotiate a meaningful pharmacare deal. The provinces have spoken. We wait now to find out what Ottawa has to say.
Recent Comments
It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I want to suggest you some interesting things or suggestions. Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read more things about it!
You certainly deserve a round of applause for your post and more specifically, your blog in general. Very high quality material!
Could not disagree with the main ideas. Wonder how things will develop over the coming years.
Dude.. I am not much into reading, but somehow I got to read lots of articles on your blog. Its amazing how interesting it is for me to visit you very often. –
Thanks for discussing the issues and covering them in a well written format.
Its wonderful as your other blog posts : D, regards for putting up.
This blog post is excellent, probably because of how well the subject was developed. I like some of the comments too though I could prefer we all stay on the subject in order add value to the subject!
Enjoyed reading through this, very good material. Thanks!
I loved your idea there, I tell you blogs are so exciting sometimes like looking into people’s private life’s and work. Every new remark wonderful in its own right.
I had fun reading this post. I want to see more on this subject.. Gives Thanks for writing this nice article.. Anyway, I’m going to subscribe to your rss and I wish you write great articles again soon.
Greetings… your blog is very interesting and beautifully written.
I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing issues with your site. It appears as though some of the written text on your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before. Appreciate it
I’ll check back after you publish more articles.
I simply could not leave your site before suggesting that I actually enjoyed the usual info a person supply in your visitors? Is going to be back often to inspect new posts
The post is absolutely fantastic! Lots of great info and inspiration, both of which we all need! Also like to admire the time and effort you put into your website and detailed info you offer! I will bookmark your website!
Substantially, the post is really the best on this laudable topic. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly watch forward to your future updates.Just saying thanx will not just be enough, for the wonderful lucidity in your writing.
I had fun reading this post. I want to see more on this subject.. Gives Thanks for writing this nice article.. Anyway, I’m going to subscribe to your rss and I wish you write great articles again soon.
Nevertheless, it’s all carried out with tongues rooted solidly in cheeks, and everybody has got nothing but absolutely love for their friendly neighborhood scapegoat. In reality, he is not merely a pushover. He is simply that extraordinary breed of person solid enough to take all that good natured ribbing for what it really is.
I think that may be an interesting element, it made me assume a bit. Thanks for sparking my considering cap. On occasion I get so much in a rut that I simply really feel like a record.
I imagine so. Very good stuff, I agree totally.