End unjust and ineffective practice of academic streaming

Posted on September 8, 2017 in Education Delivery System

TheStar.com – Opinion/Editorials – The education system should be a tool for redressing inequities, not compounding them.
Sept. 8, 2017.   By

News that Ontario’s education minister is considering ending the province’s practice of streaming Grade 9 students into either university-geared “academic” courses or more hands-on “applied” ones is cause for hope.

For nearly a quarter century, this policy has done nothing to advance the academic prospects of Ontario students while doing a great deal to reinforce the educational disadvantages experienced by low-income and Black kids. It’s high time to end it.

At the age of 13 or 14, often under pressure from teachers and with little understanding of the implications for their future, students are asked to make a decision of consequence frequently little understood. As a new study from Social Planning Toronto concludes that, “Without the maturity and support to fully grasp the weight of these decisions, some students are unknowingly following a path which inhibits them from reaching their full potential.”

On Thursday, Education Minister Mitzie Hunter acknowledged another dimension of the problem: a disproportionate number of the students unwittingly choosing to limit their academic prospects by going into the applied stream are “from racialized backgrounds and … low-income students.” This, she rightly said, is “unacceptable.”

We have long known this. As the advocacy group People for Education reported back in 2015, studies consistently demonstrate that streaming perpetuates income-based disparities in educational outcomes.

That group, which again called for an end to streaming this week, cited a Toronto District School Board study that found that only 6 per cent of students from the highest income neighbourhoods take a majority of their courses in the applied stream, compared to 33 per cent of students from the lowest income neighbourhoods.

Moreover, as a 2013 OECD study found, streaming actually produces worse outcomes for lower-income students, especially when they are divided from their peers early in secondary school. That study recommended an end to the practice.

The policy has also been shown to both reflect and reinforce racial inequalities. For instance, a disturbing York University study released this spring found that only 53 per cent of black student are enrolled in the academic courses, compared to 81 per cent of white students and 80 per cent of students of other races.

This is in part a reflection of larger socio-economic disparities, which have long been linked to educational success. But it also seems to reflect a persistent and subtle form of institutional racism.

The study found that Black students were strongly encouraged by teachers and guidance counsellors to take applied, rather than academic, courses with little regard for their aptitudes or life prospects. As a result, black students in Toronto continue to face an “achievement and opportunity gap” in GTA schools.

We have known about these problems since at least the early 1990s, yet with the exception of a few pilot projects in individual schools, the policy persists and so do its troubling consequences. Why, when we know that streaming does not achieve its stated purpose of helping academically struggling students excel?

Lower expectations breed lower outcomes. A 2015 research project at C.W. Jefferys Collegiate Institute in North York, for example, found that encouraging struggling Grade 9 students to take tougher academic courses over lower-level applied ones can actually raise pass rates.

Streaming doesn’t work, but it does hurt the chances of the most vulnerable students. That’s backwards. The education system should be a tool for redressing inequities, not compounding them. The education minister’s acknowledgement that equity in our schools may require the end of streaming is a welcome and overdue step in the right direction. Let this be the last year this unjust policy is allowed to stand.

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/2017/09/08/end-unjust-and-ineffective-practice-of-academic-streaming-editorial.html

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Friday, September 8th, 2017 at 9:00 pm and is filed under Education Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply