Canada urged to end ‘pension apartheid’
Posted on October 28, 2011 in Debates
Source: National Post — Authors: Jonathan Chevreau
NationalPost.com – FinancialPost/PersonalFinance
Oct 28, 2011. Jonathan Chevreau
Every Canadian needs $2-million in RRSP contribution room to achieve parity with public-sector defined benefit pension plans, the C.D. Howe Institute says.
As things stand, the system punishes those with defined-contribution pensions in the private sector and those who rely on what little RRSP room is granted them, says James Pierlot, principal with Toronto-based Pierlot Pension Law.
The $2-million figure comes from the value of public-sector DB plans for top managers earning $150,000 late in their careers. Rather than limit RRSP contributions to 18% of a prior year’s earned income, Mr. Pierlot would give every Canadian the lifetime RRSP contribution room, adjusted to inflation.
The need to redress the gap between pension “haves and have nots” has become urgent, Mr. Pierlot says. Indeed, a new book published by Wiley Canada – Pension Ponzi – makes the same point: It depicts a system of “pension apartheid” that favours 20% of workers with unionnegotiated public-sector DB plans at the expense of the rest who guarantee those pensions through their future taxes.
Most penalized are new Canadians, the self-employed, the chronically unemployed and those who have suffered market losses in RRSPs or prematurely withdrawn funds from them.
In an interview, Mr. Pierlot said his paper (titled Legal for Life) still calls for upfront tax deductions for RRSP contributions but no annual contribution limit. The only constraint would be coming up with the money. Plans would still be taxable once funds are withdrawn in retirement.
Eventually, registered retirement income funds (RRIFs) would decline to zero but would not be subjected to minimum annual withdrawal rules that may force seniors to sell at market bottoms.
An early draft advocated a “declining limit system.” So while the limit might fall from $2-million to $1.9-million the first year of a RRIF, and fall another $100,000 each year thereafter, someone with only $500,000 wouldn’t be forced to withdraw anything in the early years of a RRIF.
The paper does not discuss taxfree savings accounts, but Mr. Pierlot advocates a lifetime TFSA limit of $250,000 to $500,000. “The retirement system is intended for middleclass workers earning $50,000 to $150,000 a year,” he said, “Anyone earning less should not be in RRSPs but in TFSAs.”
His proposals were included in private-member’s bill C574, which passed first and second readings until the federal election intervened. The Retirement Income Bill of Rights was presented by Liberal pension critic Judy Sgro and supported by all parties except the Conservatives, Mr. Pierlot said.
“It said every Canadian shall have equal opportunity to accumulate pension income no matter how they are employed or where they were born. If it had passed, it would have forced changes to the Income Tax Act.”
Mr. Pierlot said he didn’t “cost” his ideas because Ottawa misrepresents RRSP and pension tax deductions as tax expenditures.
“They’re not,” he says. “Money goes into plans and accumulates tax-free but down the road, the government gets its tax with interest. Yes, it affects government cash flow in the short term, but it isn’t a tax-avoidance mechanism. It’s a tax deferral.”
Fred Vettese, chief actuary with Toronto-based Morneau Shepell, says Canadians “essentially have a lifetime limit already since unused RRSP contribution room can be carried forward indefinitely.” But it’s true average private-sector workers with RRSPs can’t replicate public-sector levels of retirement income. “If we truly felt public-sector plans provide an appropriate level of retirement income, the author is right in suggesting a $2-million lifetime limit to level the playing field.”
But there would still be inequity, Mr. Vettese said, because contribution rates needed to generate so much income would impoverish average RRSP savers over a working lifetime.
< http://business.financialpost.com/2011/10/28/canada-urged-to-end-pension-apartheid/ >
Tags: ideology, pensions, rights, standard of living, tax
This entry was posted on Friday, October 28th, 2011 at 10:51 am and is filed under Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
306 Responses to “Canada urged to end ‘pension apartheid’”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
Your thing regarding creating will be practically nothing in short supply of awesome. This informative article is incredibly useful and contains offered myself a better solution to be able to my own issues. Which can be the specific purpose MY PARTNER AND I has been doing a search online. I am advocating this informative article with a good friend. I know they are going to get the write-up since beneficial as i would. Yet again many thanks.
These are some of the most important issues we’ll face over the next few decades.
Nice blog. Could someone with little experience do it, and add updates without messing it up? Good information on here, very informative.
I’m partial to blogs and i actually respect your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and preserve checking for new information.
Greetings! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information. You have done a wonderful job!
You are my inspiration , I possess few web logs and very sporadically run out from to brand 🙁
I don’t normally comment but I gotta say appreciate it for the post on this one : D.
Nice blog. Could someone with little experience do it, and add updates without messing it up? Good information on here, very informative.
Great resources and tips for families here.
I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing issues with your site. It appears as though some of the written text on your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before. Appreciate it
Well done! Keep up this quality!
Beneficial Blog! I had been simply just debating that there are plenty of screwy results at this issue you now purely replaced my personal belief. Thank you an excellent write-up.
Your resources are well developed.
This is the wave – the big wave.
Your thing regarding creating will be practically nothing in short supply of awesome. This informative article is incredibly useful and contains offered myself a better solution to be able to my own issues. Which can be the specific purpose MY PARTNER AND I has been doing a search online. I am advocating this informative article with a good friend. I know they are going to get the write-up since beneficial as i would. Yet again many thanks.
Hello this is kinda of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!
Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thank you
Nevertheless, it’s all carried out with tongues rooted solidly in cheeks, and everybody has got nothing but absolutely love for their friendly neighborhood scapegoat. In reality, he is not merely a pushover. He is simply that extraordinary breed of person solid enough to take all that good natured ribbing for what it really is.
Admiring the time and effort you put into your site and detailed info you offer!
I imagine so. Very good stuff, I agree totally.