4 ways to refute the Fraser Institute’s bogus tax Index
PressProgress.ca – en/post
Aug 12, 2014. by Pressprogress
News flash: the Fraser Institute’s ongoing push for small government packaged in its latest study exaggerates the size of taxes to come up with a bogus story line about how Canadians are paying too much in taxes.
Released on Tuesday with the attention-grabbing headline, Average Canadian family spends more on taxes than necessities of life, the Canadian Consumer Tax Index claims the average family spent 41.8% of their total income on taxes in 2013 ($32,369 out of $77,381). If that doesn’t jar you, the report hits you with another number: that’s a 1,832% increase in the tax bill since 1961, when taxes ate up 33.5% of total income! (When adjusted for inflation, the increase is actually 147%).
Here are 4 problems with the findings:
1. Methodological flaws skew the results
The right-wing think tank counts non-tax revenues as “taxes” to pad the numbers, including revenues from user fees.
The Fraser Institute also includes taxes paid by businesses. “Although businesses pay these taxes directly, the cost of business taxation is ultimately passed onto ordinary Canadians,” the study states.
Economist Andrew Jackson, the Broadbent Institute’s senior policy advisor, explains why the Fraser Institute is wrong. “Most economists would agree that taxes on business are shifted to a modest degree onto workers in the form of lower wages and onto consumers in the form of higher prices. But the major impact is on profits and thus on the investment returns of higher-income taypayers.”
A U.S. study conducted by the Brookings Institute and the Urban Institute backs up this analysis. It found that 79% of revenues are borne by the top 20% of income earners < http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/412651-Tax-Model-Corporate-Tax-Incidence.pdf >. “The average family does not face a significant tax burden because of taxes levied on profits,” Jackson explains.
2. OECD analysis offers clearer picture
The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development does its own non-ideological number-crunching every year, and its analysis shows Canadian taxes from all sources amounted to 30.7% of GDP in 2012 — “which presumably means that the average family pays that amount in taxes as a share of income — if one assumes, as does the Fraser Institute, that all taxes are borne by households,” Jackson explains.
The OECD’s trend line is also unhelpful to the Fraser Institute. Taxes have been going down as a percentage of GDP (more than 5%) since 1998.
3. Even if you ignore the Fraser Institute’s methodological flaws and ideological blinders, the trend line is down (just like the OECD’s analysis)
Even by the Institute’s own flawed numbers, taxes are going down — from 46.3% of income in 2000 to 41.8% in 2013.
4. Um, taxes pay for services
The Fraser Institute says its tax index tries to answer this question: “How has the tax burden of the average family changed since 1961?” In its transparent push for small government, the Institute ignores the obvious: back in 1961, there was no medicare, no Canada Pension Plan, no Guaranteed Income Supplement, just to name a few public services.
These services cost money to deliver — and make important contributions to society while saving families a bundle.
Bonus: methodological flaws in Fraser Institute analyses are not uncommon and pretty constant < http://www.pressprogress.ca/en/post/cpp-investment-board-fraser-institute-youre-wrong-about-public-pension >. There are also plenty of howlers < http://www.pressprogress.ca/en/post/fraser-institute-keep-your-lights-247-it-grows-economy >.
< http://www.pressprogress.ca/en/post/4-ways-refute-fraser-institutes-bogus-tax-index
>
Tags: budget, economy, featured, ideology, tax
This entry was posted on Friday, August 15th, 2014 at 12:09 pm and is filed under Governance Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
329 Responses to “4 ways to refute the Fraser Institute’s bogus tax Index”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing issues with your site. It appears as though some of the written text on your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before. Appreciate it
Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thank you
Amazing! Your site has quite a few comment posts. How did you get all of these bloggers to look at your site I’m envious! I’m still studying all about posting articles on the net. I’m going to view pages on your website to get a better understanding how to attract more people. Thank you!
Thank you, I have just been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered till now. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?
I loved your idea there, I tell you blogs are so exciting sometimes like looking into people’s private life’s and work. Every new remark wonderful in its own right.
Woh I enjoy your content , saved to bookmarks!
Awesome post. It’s so good to see someone taking the time to share this information
You write Formidable articles, keep up good work.
A cool post there mate ! Thank you for posting.
Nevertheless, it’s all carried out with tongues rooted solidly in cheeks, and everybody has got nothing but absolutely love for their friendly neighborhood scapegoat. In reality, he is not merely a pushover. He is simply that extraordinary breed of person solid enough to take all that good natured ribbing for what it really is.
Thanks for some other great post. Where else may anybody get that kind of information in such an ideal method of writing? I’ve a presentation next week, and I am at the look for such information.
Your resources are well developed.
I came across an article that talks about the same thing but even more and when you go deeper.
The clarity in your post is just nice and I can tell you are an expert in the subject matter.
Hello there, You have done an incredible job. I will certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this site.
I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I do not know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!
Thanks pertaining to discussing the following superb written content on your site. I ran into it on the search engines. I will check back again if you publish extra aricles.
Very Interesting Information! Thank You For Thi Information!
This is definitely a wonderful webpage, thanks a lot..
This is valuable stuff.In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers developed their content they way you have, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.