Social security tribunal sat idle for much of first year

Posted on December 6, 2014 in Governance Debates – News/Canada – Up to 40 people making $100,000 a year sat at home during that time, says the commissioner of review tribunals.
Dec 05 2014.   By: Lee-Anne Goodman, The Canadian Press

OTTAWA—The federal government announced two years ago it was creating a streamlined social security tribunal that would save Canadian taxpayers $25 million a year, but some well-paid new members had nothing to do during its first year of operation.

“The tribunal — the one that was supposed to save money — had 30-40 people making $100,000 a year sitting at home that first year,” Philippe Rabot, the commissioner of review tribunals from 2005 to 2010, said in an interview.

“They had no work assigned to them for a year. It wasn’t their fault. The department simply wasn’t ready on April 1, 2013. They didn’t have enough lead time to set up such a big tribunal, and the tribunal wasn’t ready to start assigning cases.”

Some of the decision-makers who worked in the old system were brought onto the new tribunal by the department that was then known as Human Resources and Social Development. Rabot is familiar with the launch period.

A former tribunal member who left the board confirmed there was little to do in the early days.

A spokesman for the tribunal, however, says the new appointees were being trained or mentored by “more experienced members.

“Furthermore, members worked on becoming more proficient with our new case management system that allowed them to move from paper to electronic files,” Laura Revilien said in an email.

Meantime, terminal cancer patients, those suffering debilitating injuries and debt-addled Canadians waited for their appeals to be heard. Some have now waited as long as five years amid a growing backlog of 11,000 social security cases, mostly involving those seeking Canada Pension Plan disability benefits.

One of them just won his appeal after a four-year battle. The man, who spoke on condition of anonymity, suffered a stroke and was ultimately unable to work due to related health issues.

“My wife and I did manage, and we’re not starving by any means, but I’ve been having to dip into my RRSPs to keep above water and that shouldn’t be,” said the former construction worker, who fears having his award withheld in retaliation for speaking out.

The man says when he received word that he had won, the tribunal made reference to “recent” information about his health. That information was sent to the government almost two years ago, he said in astonishment.

In its first year, the social security tribunal concluded just 461 hearings on appeals from people denied CPP disability and old-age security benefits — and most of those appeals were dismissed.

That’s compared to thousands of hearings held the previous year under the old regime and despite an ever-ballooning backlog.

Employment Minister Jason Kenney has pointed to a “rigorous pre-screening process” for new members and an “unexpected legacy backlog” in explaining how the pileup has grown so large. His office recently hired 22 part-timers to help 73 full-time tribunal members wrestle with the backlog.

But the tribunal was seriously understaffed its first year, with several full-time positions remaining vacant until this summer, more than a year after its official launch.

Full-time members earn between $97,000 and $114,000 a year. If 30 to 40 of them were idle in the first year of operation, that amounts to millions of dollars in wasted salary expenses.

In written responses to questions from Liberal MPs earlier this year, the government revealed that almost $12 million of its $13.6-million price tag in the tribunal’s first year of operation went to salaries.

Longtime stakeholders suggest the government had ulterior motives in slowing down the appeals process.

“Those who successfully appeal do not receive any interest on the years of retroactive benefits,” says a lawyer who asked for anonymity because he represents dozens of clients awaiting decisions on their appeals and he fears government reprisals.

“The government keeps it. There’s the incentive to not be in any rush to adjudicate cases; they used the stalled system to earn money. Let’s not forget the new prosperity presently being enjoyed by the government.”

The Canada Pension Plan has net assets of more than $180 billion from contributions and returns on investments.

In an emailed response, the tribunal didn’t immediately comment on whether new members didn’t have cases assigned to them in the early months of the social security tribunal’s existence.

< >

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Saturday, December 6th, 2014 at 2:33 pm and is filed under Governance Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply