Playing the politics of slogans and fear
Posted on February 23, 2011 in Governance Debates
Source: Globe & Mail — Authors: Jeffrey Simpson
TheGlobeandMail.com – news/opinions
Published Wednesday, Feb. 23, 2011. Jeffrey Simpson
In a country of “peace, order and good government,” any government should worry about order, including threats to that order from crime. Crime rates are falling for many offences, according to Statistics Canada, but crime remains a legitimate concern for people and communities, a concern magnified by pervasive media coverage.
But there’s a difference between being serious about crime and playing political games with it. And what we have, sadly, is the politics of sloganeering about crime, rather than serious measures. About a dozen bills have been presented to Parliament by the Harper government as part of a “tough on crime” agenda, the latest being a truly laughable one announced by the Prime Minister in a photo op last week, making rarely used and dangerous citizens’ arrests slightly easier.
Almost the entire expert community – corrections experts, lawyers, judges, criminologists – opposes most of these measures. Many of them have trooped before parliamentary committees to say the measures either will do nothing to deter crime or will make things worse. To no avail, of course, because we’re not talking about rational policy-making – we’re talking about the politics of fear.
What these measures will do is swell the prison population, with considerable costs to taxpayers, without making them any safer. Both Ottawa and the provinces will shoulder billions of additional dollars for more people going to prison and staying there longer, although the Harper government refuses to give a proper accounting to Parliament.
The Parliament Budgetary Officer believes one measure – the Truth in Sentencing Act – will cost $5-billion; the government puts it at $2-billion. This cost for taxpayers will come from a government warning everyone to tighten belts to reduce the deficit.
Similarly, conditions within prisons – such as double-bunking – will worsen. This will hit especially hard the aboriginal community, whose members are disproportionately represented in corrections institutions.
No matter for the government. It wants to be able to portray those who oppose such measures as “soft on crime,” or people who like to “hug a thug.” The politics of slogans is what these measures are mostly about.
Consider just one measure now before Parliament: increasing mandatory minimum sentences for drug offences. There were 19 such mandatory minimums, often for gun-related crimes, before the latest measures. According to academic studies, stiffer mandatory minimums in the U.S. have done little, if anything, to lower crime rates. At best, the evidence is mixed for the impact on certain types of crimes; at worst, the evidence suggests no impact. What we do know, however, is that prison costs have risen for U.S. taxpayers, plea bargains occur less often and costly trials increase, with no discernible impact on crime rates.
A parade of witnesses – from the experts to a coalition of Christian churches, from law societies to former Quebec Superior Court justice John Gomery (once a Conservative hero for his report into the sponsorship scandal of the Chrétien era) – has opposed the government. But, as we said, to no avail.
A serious debate about crime would cover policing techniques and numbers, better intelligence and working in economically depressed areas with targeted social programs. Yes, there have been some judicial rulings where sentencing was lenient, to say the least. And yes, you can make an argument that the Supreme Court excessively expanded rights of the accused and put too many obstacles in the way of effective police work.
A serious debate would require sifting through the best evidence in Canada and abroad, figuring out which measures would really help, understanding that no attack on crime can be successful without fighting the causes of crime, and that just ramping up punishment without other measures is the least effective means for reducing crime rates.
But this kind of intelligent discussion doesn’t stand a chance in a media world convinced that simplistic crime stories sell, and in a governmental world more interested in playing political games with crime through sloganeering and phony measures.
< http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/jeffrey-simpson/playing-the-politics-of-slogans-and-fear/article1916381/ >
Tags: ideology, participation, standard of living
This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011 at 7:57 pm and is filed under Governance Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
134 Responses to “Playing the politics of slogans and fear”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
I’ve thought about posting something about this before. Good job! Can I use part of your post in my blog?
Amazing article, cheers, I will bookmark you now.
bonjour I love Your Blog can not say I come here often but im liking what i c so far….
You appear to know so much about this, and I see you’re a published author. Thanks
Great post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed! Very useful info specifically the last part 🙂 I care for such info much. I was looking for this certain information for a very long time. Thank you and good luck.
This has to be one of my favorite posts! And on top of thats its also very helpful topic for newbies. thank a lot for the information!
Good post. I study something more difficult on different blogs everyday. It’s going to always be stimulating to learn content material from other writers and observe a little bit one thing from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content material on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link in your web blog. Thanks for sharing.
Well done! Keep up this quality!
I think this is among the so much vital info for me. And i’m happy reading your article. But wanna remark on few common issues, The site style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent : D. Just right job, cheers
Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thank you
I believe this web site has some really wonderful info for everyone : D.
Our communities really need to deal with this.
Oh my goodness! an amazing article. Great work.
Αν έχεις ήδη αποφασίσει να φύγεις από τις πλατφόρμες με ελληνική άδεια ΕΕΕΠ, η ερώτηση δεν είναι «αξίζει;» αλλά «ποια από αυτές αξίζει περισσότερο;». Ελέγξαμε 15 διεθνείς στοιχηματικές εταιρείες που λειτουργούν στην Ελλάδα το 2026: ανοίξαμε λογαριασμούς με ελληνικά στοιχεία, δοκιμάσαμε καταθέσεις με κάρτα και κρυπτονόμισμα, και μετρήσαμε τον πραγματικό χρόνο ανάληψης. Το βασικό κίνητρο για τους περισσότερους είναι πρακτικό: οι διεθνείς πλατφόρμες δεν εφαρμόζουν αυτόματη παρακράτηση φόρου επί των κερδών, δεν κόβουν λογαριασμούς που κερδίζουν συστηματικά και προσφέρουν ευρύτερη γραμμή με περισσότερα αθλήματα. Οι εταιρείες που ακολουθούν δέχονται εγγραφή από την Ελλάδα, η πρόσβαση στον ιστότοπο δεν απαιτεί VPN και κανένας από αυτούς δεν βρίσκεται στον κατάλογο αποκλεισμένων τοποθεσιών της ΕΕΕΠ κατά την τελευταία επικαιροποίηση.
The post is absolutely great! Lots of great info and inspiration, both of which we all need! Also like to admire the time and effort you put into your blog and detailed information you offer! I will bookmark your website!
You have some helpful ideas! Maybe I should consider doing this by myself.
Aktualny przegląd promocji na 2026 rok obejmuje kasyna online, które oferują bonus bez depozytu w formie darmowych spinów, dodatkowych środków lub pakietu łączonego. Pokazujemy, jak aktywować ofertę, jakie wymagania obrotu trzeba spełnić oraz które limity wypłat warto sprawdzić przed rozpoczęciem gry. Bonus bez depozytu za utworzenie konta pozostaje jedną z najpopularniejszych promocji w kasynach online. Pozwala nowym użytkownikom przetestować platformę, dostępne gry kasynowe oraz obsługę konta bez konieczności dokonywania pierwszej wpłaty. Przygotowując ranking najlepszych kasyn z bonusami bez depozytu 2026, porównaliśmy aktualne propozycje operatorów, w tym oferty Roman Casino i NV Casino.
A good web site with interesting content, that’s what I need. Thank you for making this web site, and I will be visiting again. Do you do newsletters? I Can’t find it.
Hi, do have a e-newsletter? In the event you don’t definately should get on that piece…this web site is pure gold!
That’s some inspirational stuff. Never knew that opinions might be this varied. Thanks for all the enthusiasm to supply such helpful information here.