Middle class in decline is the electoral elephant in the room

Posted on April 7, 2011 in Debates

Source: — Authors:

TheGlobeandMail.com – report-on-business/economy/economy-lab
Posted on Thursday, April 7, 2011.   Armine Yalnizyan (Armine Yalnizyan is a senior economist with theCanadian Centre for Policy Alternatives)

As the volume gets cranked up on the federal election debate about tax cuts and family values, a middle class in decline remains the electoral elephant in the room.

Every political party wraps itself up in the middle class flag during elections. Few talk about what is happening: for anyone who doesn’t already have one, middle class jobs with decent wages, benefits and pensions are becoming harder to find.

In the decades following the Second World War, the growth of manufacturing and the expansion of public services extended middle class job opportunities to millions of non-professionals.

By the time I was a young adult looking for a job in the 1970s, the manufacturing and public sectors together accounted for 49 per cent of the nation’s employees.

Importantly, workers in both these growing sectors formed unions, which brought stable jobs with decent wages, benefits and good pensions within the reach of the average person.

Today, taking the rising ranks of the self-employed into account, jobs in the manufacturing and public sectors account for the work of less than 31 per cent of Canadians. Those two primary sources of middle class employment once accounted for almost half of Canada’s payroll.

Union density rose from 28 per cent in 1946 to a peak of 36.4 per cent in the mid-1980s. Since then, rates of unionization have been falling. By 2010, only 31.5 per cent of Canadians were covered by a collective agreement — the same as in the early 1960s.

Not coincidentally, that decline is matched by a rise in self-employment and temporary jobs — term or contract, seasonal, and casual/on-call types of employment — with few, if any, benefits, no pensions, and not even reliable working hours. Self-employment accounted for 16% of all paid work in 2010; 13% of employees were temporary.

Canada’s head count of workers has rebounded to pre-recession levels, but the majority of these jobs have emerged through the growth of the public sector.

As governments attempt to balance their books, the aging work force in the public service will be the cover for death by a thousand cuts, without a peep being uttered.

Stockwell Day, the outgoing minister of the federal Treasury Board, suggested months ago that mandatory across-the-board departmental spending cuts worth billions could be achieved by simply not replacing workers who retire.

Canada did its austerity-style budget-slashing in the mid-1990s. This time, there will be less of a stage show, but the effect will be the same.

Fewer people in the public service means fewer people earning middle-class pay with decent benefits and pensions. Unless the private sector stops urging downward pressure on wages, benefits and pensions, this purchasing power will not be replaced. Fewer people working in the public service also means poorer public services, or less of them.

Less income, less service — this is not a recipe for growing the middle class, or a solid platform for future economic growth.

We celebrate a rising middle class in emerging economies, but stand by and watch as our own middle class continues to get pounded.

The worst is likely not behind us. Even in a time of economic recovery, and even in unionized workplaces, hanging on to a job may mean accepting wage freezes, work-time reductions, benefit rollbacks and two-tiered pensions — one system for the older work force, another for the young.

Instead of trying to improve security and raise employment standards for all, Canadians are egged on by politicians to strip more workers’ rights from those who have them — a political agenda that is accelerating the middle class’ race to the bottom. This is a dead-end strategy.

Once upon a time, Canadians supported the idea of growing the middle class. It meant more people had more opportunities. It stabilized the economy. It produced greater social cohesion. It facilitated consensus and fostered trust in democracy.

The challenge for all who seek a return to broad-based prosperity is to come up with the answer to the question: where will the next generation of good middle-class jobs come from?

The bad news is, there are no shortcuts: widespread prosperity is a product of dedicated, consistent objective to reach that goal by employers and workers, citizens and governments alike.

The good news is, it’s totally possible to match — possibly even exceed — what our parent’s generation achieved. Out of the rubble of the Great Depression and the Second World War, they built a thriving middle class, and a world of opportunity.

It’s up to us to make it so once more.

How will their policies help build the middle class of the next generation? That’s what we need our political parties to tell us, as they ask for our vote.

< http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/the-economists/middle-class-in-decline-is-the-electoral-elephant-in-the-room/article1974539/ >

Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 7th, 2011 at 1:16 pm and is filed under Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

2 Responses to “Middle class in decline is the electoral elephant in the room”

  1. spitfire says:

    I enjoyed the topic of this article, but it falls flat on a solution. It is ob vious that the middle class is being eradicated and I think we are all very scared for what this means for people in their 20’s,30’s and 40’s. people in those age brackets need to face the fact that they are not destined to live their parents life. It is equally disturbing to point out that the older generation(baby boommers), whose advice is usually respected by the younger generation may be given outdated encouragement and adding stressors to the new reality. We need to jump from this “positive spin/talk” catchphrase addiction we are being forced to buy into and look at the black and white. The “middle class” was an economic bandaid for a world just bullshitted into fighting two world wars. Lets stop the inflationary cost of living and watching kids chase empty promises, by demanding solid explanations as to why things cost so much. Natural Resources are low cost until “corporations” get their hands on them. We all seem to be complacent to being told we should look the other way and just open our wallets,shrug, and say “what ya gonna do”. this is akin to shoving your own head up your ass and being told it smells like roses up there. The bell needs to sound. It needs to stop. People need to start talking to each other honestly, no egos,pride or “status”. It means we all stop pretending and start uniting. The world isn’t so different from one contenant to another. We need to end the rise of the greedy and acknowledge the masses. We have been sold the illusion that we could be one of them and that you could “finance” your dream (be it a car,house,school loan,clothes,generally anything worth striving for the made “financeable”). We need to talk. Talk to neighbours, people at the malls,bus stops, anywhere. No more small talk, lets start big talk. No one will care if we don’t do anything, but be prepared to look at the next generation and tell them why there chasing a dream that you couldn’t catch.

  2. slacker says:

    Interesting article , I’m going to spend more time researching this subject


Leave a Reply