Loyola’s good fight
Posted on June 29, 2010 in Education Debates
Source: National Post — Authors: Editorial
NationalPost.com – Opinion/Editorial
Monday, Jun. 28, 2010
In 2008, the Quebec government introduced a grade-school course titled “Ethics and Religious Culture” (ECR), to replace the religion courses previously offered by the province’s schools. Compulsory in all public and private institutions, ECR presents all religions on a morally relativistic footing, and devotes considerable weight to the history of liberal social movements.
The introduction of ECR generated opposition among parents who saw it as an exercise in social engineering. Two court challenges were launched, one involving the public school system, which failed, and one involving the private system, which was decided earlier this month in Montreal.
The case dates back to March, 2008, when Loyola High School, a private Catholic boys’ school in Montreal, asked the Quebec government for an exemption from ECR. Loyola wished to teach an equivalent program from a Catholic perspective, in order to be true to its Jesuit mandate. The government denied the school’s request on the grounds that its program was confessional, and thus inherently incompatible with the secular ECR. Loyola took the matter to court.
In a 63-page judgment, Justice Gerard Dugre of the Quebec Superior Court held that the government’s refusal to exempt Loyola from the course was “totalitarian” and unconstitutional. The judge decried the province’s decision as a breach of freedom of religion, guaranteed by the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.
We applaud this decision. Educators don’t have to be agnostic to teach ethics and the beliefs of the world’s major religions. To explicitly preclude teaching ECR from a confessional perspective, as the judge points out, directly contradicts one of the goals of the course: to respect diversity of belief and the different means of achieving the same ends.
At the same time, we concede that a democratically elected provincial government has the right to supervise school curricula — especially when taxpayer money is on the line. In Quebec, even private schools benefit from substantial government funding: The government pays 60% of the cost per student that it would in the public system.
This policy leads to unavoidable tensions — because parents who send their children to private schools often do so precisely in order to avoid the one-size-fits-all approach to education that takes place in the public system. And so the government allows for exemptions on an ad hoc basis. Loyola had received one before, when it sought to combine two years of instruction of social studies into one. Other schools, such as ” sports etudes” institutions, may receive exemptions from the usual physical-education requirements, as their students are already getting a heavy dose of specialized sports.
Religion and ethics courses present a more profound problem, however, because they seek to directly shape the child’s values — an area that directly implicates a family’s freedom of conscience and of religion. Parents who send their children to a private religious school are not just paying for what they believe to be a higher-quality education, but are seeking continuity with the values they teach their children at home. To have those contradicted in the school environment undermines their goal.
This is a good opportunity for the Quebec government to revisit the ECR issue entirely, with a view toward striking a better balance between parents’ right to the religious and moral education of their children, and the state’s right to determine the classroom curricula that it funds: While retaining the current case-by-case exemption-approvals process, the government also should set a policy whereby private institutions that seek to go their own way entirely can elect to do so by rejecting some specified share of the government funding they would otherwise receive.
Parents would thus have a choice: Pay more for the privilege of exempting their children from ECR, or accept state money and the state’s secularized curriculum.
In some cases, such as home schooling, parents may receive no government funds already, and should be exempted from the government’s version of ECR if they choose. Students will still have to take the government’s final exams in the course to get their high school diploma, but how they learn the material will be up to their parents.
Predictably, the Quebec government has appealed Justice Dugre’s decision, and Loyola will contest the appeal. Meanwhile, the school will teach ECR in the way it proposed, from a confessional standpoint. While no other school has asked for an exemption, Loyola’s principal, Paul Donovan, told the National Post that “I know that a number of heads of schools are very interested to see how this case turns out.” So are parents, and anyone who values parents’ ability to shape the moral and religious education of their children.
< http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/Loyola+good+fight/3209581/story.html >
This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 29th, 2010 at 1:06 pm and is filed under Education Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
106 Responses to “Loyola’s good fight”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
I have been curious about these trends, and you have really helped me. I have just told a few of my friends about this on FaceBook and they love your content just as much as I do.
Dude.. I am not much into reading, but somehow I got to read lots of articles on your blog. Its amazing how interesting it is for me to visit you very often. –
you’re in reality a just right webmaster. The web site loading velocity is incredible. It sort of feels that you’re doing any distinctive trick. In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve performed a great process on this topic!
I have been curious about these trends, and you have really helped me. I have just told a few of my friends about this on FaceBook and they love your content just as much as I do.
With internet full of dupe articles it is nice to find original content like yours thank you so very much.
OK, you outline what is a big issue. But, can’t we develop more answers in the private sector?
Saw your material, and hope you publish more soon.
Thanks for your patience and sorry for the inconvenience!
I am glad to be a visitor of this perfect blog !, appreciate it for this rare info!
Surprisingly good post. I really found your primary webpage and additionally wanted to suggest that have essentially enjoyed searching your website blog posts. Whatever the case I’ll always be subscribing to your entire supply and I hope you jot down ever again soon!
Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Lots of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!
I just added your web site to my blogroll, I hope you would look at doing the same.
Certainly. And I have faced it. Let’s discuss this question. Here or in PM.
Hi, I just hopped over to your web-site through StumbleUpon. Not somthing I might typically browse, but I liked your views none the less. Thanks for making something worthy of reading through.
Αν έχεις ήδη αποφασίσει να φύγεις από τις πλατφόρμες με ελληνική άδεια ΕΕΕΠ, η ερώτηση δεν είναι «αξίζει;» αλλά «ποια από αυτές αξίζει περισσότερο;». Ελέγξαμε 15 διεθνείς στοιχηματικές εταιρείες που λειτουργούν στην Ελλάδα το 2026: ανοίξαμε λογαριασμούς με ελληνικά στοιχεία, δοκιμάσαμε καταθέσεις με κάρτα και κρυπτονόμισμα, και μετρήσαμε τον πραγματικό χρόνο ανάληψης. Το βασικό κίνητρο για τους περισσότερους είναι πρακτικό: οι διεθνείς πλατφόρμες δεν εφαρμόζουν αυτόματη παρακράτηση φόρου επί των κερδών, δεν κόβουν λογαριασμούς που κερδίζουν συστηματικά και προσφέρουν ευρύτερη γραμμή με περισσότερα αθλήματα. Οι εταιρείες που ακολουθούν δέχονται εγγραφή από την Ελλάδα, η πρόσβαση στον ιστότοπο δεν απαιτεί VPN και κανένας από αυτούς δεν βρίσκεται στον κατάλογο αποκλεισμένων τοποθεσιών της ΕΕΕΠ κατά την τελευταία επικαιροποίηση.
Aktualny przegląd promocji na 2026 rok obejmuje kasyna online, które oferują bonus bez depozytu w formie darmowych spinów, dodatkowych środków lub pakietu łączonego. Pokazujemy, jak aktywować ofertę, jakie wymagania obrotu trzeba spełnić oraz które limity wypłat warto sprawdzić przed rozpoczęciem gry. Bonus bez depozytu za utworzenie konta pozostaje jedną z najpopularniejszych promocji w kasynach online. Pozwala nowym użytkownikom przetestować platformę, dostępne gry kasynowe oraz obsługę konta bez konieczności dokonywania pierwszej wpłaty. Przygotowując ranking najlepszych kasyn z bonusami bez depozytu 2026, porównaliśmy aktualne propozycje operatorów, w tym oferty Roman Casino i NV Casino.
I would share your post with my sis.
Might we expect to see more of these same problems in the future?
I’d like to be able to write like this, but taking the time and developing articles is hard…. Takes a lot of effort.
Some truly nice stuff on this website , I like it.