Bringing coherence to our fragmented EI system
Posted on January 22, 2011 in Debates
Source: National Post — Authors: Matthew Mendelsohn, Roy Romanow
NationalPost.com – story
Friday, Jan. 21, 2011. Roy Romanow and Matthew Mendelsohn, National Post
What follows is the last in a five-part series of articles about Employment Insurance from researchers affiliated with the Mowat Centre EI Task Force at the School of Public Policy & Governance at the University of Toronto. The Mowat Centre’s EI Task Force Toronto conference and consultations will be held today.
Canada’s Employment Insurance program is beset with many problems. While the program has evolved substantially since its introduction, its modern iteration has been distorted by partisan politics and ad hoc adjustments designed to put out small, often regional, fires. Most experts agree that the system is broken and needs an overhaul.
If the EI system is to regain the faith of workers and businesses, it needs to be simple, principled and transparent. Workers and employers should know their obligations and entitlements and have a clear understanding of the rationale behind them. This isn’t the case today.
The Mowat Centre is leading a nonpartisan effort to re-design the system. The hope is to present a credible, principled alternative that will enable the federal government to modernize EI so that it works for all Canadians, workers and employers alike. In doing so, we are tackling some big questions, listed below.
Why does the EI system treat Canadians differently based on where they live?
The EI system makes benefits easier to access for longer periods in areas with higher levels of unemployment, responding (in principle) to differing levels of need, as defined by the regional unemployment rate.
This is a worthwhile principle, but in practice most experts argue that it doesn’t make sense.
There is actually little evidence that the local unemployment rate is the best predictor of how difficult it is for any individual to find a job. (Some research, for instance, finds that when the unemployment rate is going up it is harder to find a job, regardless of the actual unemployment rate.) There may be a case for treating workers differently in different regions, but the evidence would need to be compelling to deviate from the principle of equal treatment for all for a basic social entitlement.
Who should qualify for benefits?
Few experts would suggest that the rules for qualification reflect the needs of the modern workforce. New entrants to the labour market must work significantly longer in order to qualify for benefits. Workers who collect benefits on a yearly basis suffer no penalty, while workers who have not collected after decades of contribution receive no additional benefit when they find that they need the program. Temporary Foreign Workers pay into the system but rules basically prevent them from ever collecting. Part-time workers and contract workers — even those working long hours–often cannot qualify if they lose a job
Who should have access to job training?
A portion of the contributions that workers and businesses make to EI fund training for some unemployed workers. The federal government has downloaded responsibility for delivering EI-funded training programs to the provinces, but still continues to define eligibility for these programs through EI.
These restrictions on eligibility may no longer make sense. Many unemployed people now fall outside the EI umbrella. Today’s economy may demand that access to training not be defined by EI eligibility rules, which were crafted for an entirely different purpose: income support, not job training.
If training is a broad economic and social priority, it may make sense to fund training out of general government revenues rather than through EI premiums. This could be part of a national human-capital strategy — or a responsibility transferred to provinces enabling them to design and manage their own training programs to meet their local labour market needs..
How can we improve the co-ordination between EI and other income support programs, like Social Assistance, social housing and tax benefits?
Canada’s broken federal-provincial relations victimize the unemployed. A lack of co-ordination between those making decisions about the federal EI program and provincial social assistance programs creates gaps that are unjustifiable from a labour-market-efficiency and social-justice perspective. A coherent system would be run by one order of government. Other countries have one system. Canada has two parallel systems that are barely on speaking terms.
EI is a foundational piece of our social safety net. For it to retain its legitimacy, it has to be principled, transparent and fair. Business, labour and Canadians generally must see their interests reflected in EI reform.
Canadians have to believe that the government is treating them equitably. Right now, none of these things hold. That isn’t just a problem for our social safety net and our productivity — it’s a problem for our democracy as well.
– Roy Romanow is co-chair of the Advisory Committee of the Mowat Centre EI Task Force. Matthew Mendelsohn is the founding director of the Mowat Centre.
< http://www.nationalpost.com/Bringing+coherence+fragmented+system/4141748/story.html >
Tags: economy, standard of living
This entry was posted on Saturday, January 22nd, 2011 at 10:12 am and is filed under Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
3,001 Responses to “Bringing coherence to our fragmented EI system”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
Every weekend i used to visit this site, for the reason that i wish for enjoyment, since this this web page conations truly nice funny material too.
What’s up mates, good post and pleasant urging commented here, I am really enjoying by these.
You are so cool! I don’t believe I’ve truly read a single thing like
this before. So wonderful to find another person with original thoughts on this
issue. Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This website is something that is needed on the internet, someone with some originality!
Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is excellent, as well as the
content!
Hey! Would you mind if I share your blog with my twitter group?
There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content.
Please let me know. Cheers
I visit daily a few web pages and sites to read articles, but this blog gives quality
based content.
Greetings! Very helpful advice in this particular article!
It is the little changes that will make the greatest changes.
Thanks a lot for sharing!
I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but good topic.
I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.
Thanks for great info I was looking for this info for my mission.
There is definately a great deal to find out about this subject.
I like all the points you made.
Hi, after reading this amazing piece of writing
i am also delighted to share my familiarity here with friends.
We stumbled over here different web address and thought I might as well check
things out. I like what I see so now i am following you. Look
forward to looking at your web page repeatedly.
hey there and thank you for your info – I’ve definitely picked up something new from right here.
I did however expertise several technical issues using this website,
since I experienced to reload the site a lot of times previous
to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web hosting
is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will very
frequently affect your placement in google and
could damage your high quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords.
Anyway I am adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much more
of your respective fascinating content. Make sure you update this again soon.
I am actually thankful to the owner of this website who has shared this impressive article at here.
First off I want to say fantastic blog! I had a quick question in which I’d like to ask if you don’t
mind. I was curious to find out how you center yourself and clear your thoughts before writing.
I have had trouble clearing my thoughts in getting my thoughts out.
I do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are
generally wasted just trying to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or hints?
Thanks!
Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but
after going through some of the posts I realized it’s new to
me. Anyways, I’m definitely pleased I stumbled upon it
and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back
regularly!
Hi there Dear, are you genuinely visiting this web
page daily, if so afterward you will definitely
obtain pleasant knowledge.
Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your web site
and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed
account your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently quickly.
Hi there it’s me, I am also visiting this web page regularly, this web
page is actually good and the people are
truly sharing pleasant thoughts.
Hello there, I do think your sie might be having broiwser
compatibility problems. Whenn I look aat your blog in Safari, it lloks fine but when opening iin Internet
Explorer, it’s ggot some overlappping issues.
I merly wantyed to ive you a quick heads up! Other thasn that, wnderful blog!
xnxx
Good respond in return of this query with real arguments and describing everything regarding that.