The Ford government’s superficial arguments against pharmacare

Posted on July 12, 2018 in Health Policy Context

—

BehindTheNumbers.ca – 2018/07/11

online pharmacy buy cymbalta with best prices today in the USA

Ontario’s new Progressive Conservative government is rejigging OHIP+, a modest but promising pharmacare policy introduced by the previous Liberal government, allegedly to make more efficient use of tax dollars. Where the short-lived program covered most prescription drug costs for people under 25, OHIP+ will now only cover people without individual or workplace-linked private insurance plans.

On the surface, it may sound reasonable to expect that governments would direct social spending to those who need it more. However, surfaces can often hide what lays beneath. In this case, a surface-level argument for efficiency in the immediate use of tax dollars hides rather important ideological differences between universal and pay-as-you-go services, and obscures some of the large benefits (including extensive efficiency gains) of all-in pharmacare.

First, we must consider the idea of social solidarity, which says that if something bad happens to one of us, no matter who that person is or what their status, society will take care of them. Social solidarity explains (at least partly) why police and fire services are paid for out of the common tax pool, and entirely explains why hospital and doctor services are available to all patients regardless of income and without out-of-pocket payments. Why should payment for medicines be any different?

Second, with respect to the hidden bonuses of universal access, a side effect of having everyone in the same boat is that if something goes wrong, or services aren’t being delivered properly, it’s easier to rock the boat. The wealthy and the privileged have better access to those who control the services and will make sure that their concerns are heard and corrections are made. This only scratches the surface of the myths and misconceptions about public payment for medicines that are concealed below the surface of “efficiency.”

For example, is it actually more efficient to have multiple payers for prescription drugs? It’s true that a national pharmacare plan where everyone would be covered, either run by the federal government alone or by a combination of federal and provincial/territorial governments, will mean more public spending. But it’s also true that overall spending will drop substantially, by as much as $4 billion a year according to the 2017 report from the Parliamentary Budget Office.

That decrease in overall cost is largely because a single payer has much more bargaining powerwith drug companies than hundreds of private payers and the current public plans. We are already paying for our medicines, the question is whether we want to continue to pay more than necessary through multiple payers or less through a single payer?

When it comes to money, we also need to realize that public insurance is much more cost efficient than private insurance. Overhead for public health insurance in Canada is about 2-3% of outlays, whereas, as of 2011, there was a 28% gap in private insurance plans between what they take in as revenue and what they pay out in benefits. The difference is in the amount spent on advertising and the profits of the companies.

Private insurance plans are less efficient. They are less likely to bargain on prices or require generic substitution, and the price that they pay for drugs is not transparent. Private plans are also not uniform. Some have yearly or lifetime caps on benefits, or different requirements for copays (patients pay a fixed amount per prescription), coinsurance (patients pay a percentage of the cost of each prescription) and deductibles (the amount that patients have to pay before they receive any benefits).

Finally, a variety of critics of pharmacare often bemoan the fact that not all drugs that have been approved by Health Canada will be covered. It’s fair to say there will be some expensive drugs or drugs for rare diseases (often the two are the same) that will be left off a national formulary. This speaks to the necessity to have a fair, rapid and evidence-based system to deal with these special circumstances.

But the main reason why most drugs are not covered is that they offer little to no additional therapeutic benefit over existing drugs. Out of the 564 new patented drugs evaluated by the federal Patented Medicine Prices Review Board between 2010 and 2016, only 37 (6.6%) were major advances and an additional 90 (16%) were moderate improvements.

Let’s dispense with superficial arguments about pharmacare and see what really lays below the surface.


Joel Lexchin, MSc, MD, is Professor Emeritus at the School of Health Policy and Management, York University, an emergency physician with the University Health Network, and a CCPA research associate.

http://behindthenumbers.ca/2018/07/11/the-ford-governments-superficial-arguments-against-pharmacare/?utm_source=Ontario+Mailing+List&utm_campaign=7c2908c8b9-&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e98e32d53b-7c2908c8b9-40215997&mc_cid=7c2908c8b9&mc_eid=299b6a00a6

online pharmacy purchase cozaar no prescription with best prices today in the USA
online pharmacy purchase flagyl online no prescription

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 12th, 2018 at 10:00 am and is filed under Health Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

371 Responses to “The Ford government’s superficial arguments against pharmacare”

  1. Does it look like we’re in for a big ride here?

  2. Αν έχεις ήδη αποφασίσει να φύγεις από τις πλατφόρμες με ελληνική άδεια ΕΕΕΠ, η ερώτηση δεν είναι «αξίζει;» αλλά «ποια από αυτές αξίζει περισσότερο;». Ελέγξαμε 15 διεθνείς στοιχηματικές εταιρείες που λειτουργούν στην Ελλάδα το 2026: ανοίξαμε λογαριασμούς με ελληνικά στοιχεία, δοκιμάσαμε καταθέσεις με κάρτα και κρυπτονόμισμα, και μετρήσαμε τον πραγματικό χρόνο ανάληψης. Το βασικό κίνητρο για τους περισσότερους είναι πρακτικό: οι διεθνείς πλατφόρμες δεν εφαρμόζουν αυτόματη παρακράτηση φόρου επί των κερδών, δεν κόβουν λογαριασμούς που κερδίζουν συστηματικά και προσφέρουν ευρύτερη γραμμή με περισσότερα αθλήματα. Οι εταιρείες που ακολουθούν δέχονται εγγραφή από την Ελλάδα, η πρόσβαση στον ιστότοπο δεν απαιτεί VPN και κανένας από αυτούς δεν βρίσκεται στον κατάλογο αποκλεισμένων τοποθεσιών της ΕΕΕΠ κατά την τελευταία επικαιροποίηση.

  3. I had highly recommend this blog to my good friend, it’s so good

  4. xoso66 says:

    These stories are so important.

  5. Aktualny przegląd promocji na 2026 rok obejmuje kasyna online, które oferują bonus bez depozytu w formie darmowych spinów, dodatkowych środków lub pakietu łączonego. Pokazujemy, jak aktywować ofertę, jakie wymagania obrotu trzeba spełnić oraz które limity wypłat warto sprawdzić przed rozpoczęciem gry. Bonus bez depozytu za utworzenie konta pozostaje jedną z najpopularniejszych promocji w kasynach online. Pozwala nowym użytkownikom przetestować platformę, dostępne gry kasynowe oraz obsługę konta bez konieczności dokonywania pierwszej wpłaty. Przygotowując ranking najlepszych kasyn z bonusami bez depozytu 2026, porównaliśmy aktualne propozycje operatorów, w tym oferty Roman Casino i NV Casino.

  6. Certainly. And I have faced it. Let’s discuss this question. Here or in PM.

  7. Wpisujesz w wyszukiwarkę frazę „polskie kasyno” i chcesz znaleźć sprawdzoną platformę? Najczęściej chodzi o licencjonowane kasyno online dostępne dla graczy z Polski, które oferuje BLIK, korzystne promocje, szybkie wypłaty oraz obsługę w języku polskim. Porównujemy operatorów pod kątem rejestracji, metod wpłat i wypłat, bonusów bez depozytu, darmowych spinów, poziomu wsparcia klienta oraz liczby dostępnych gier. Ranking na 2026 rok obejmuje serwisy dostępne dla graczy z Polski, ale nie sprowadza się jedynie do listy najlepsze kasyna online. Publikujemy również recenzje operatorów, dane dotyczące licencji i statusu prawnego, informacje o popularnych grach, zasady bezpiecznej oraz odpowiedzialnej rozgrywki, a także porównanie platform internetowych z kasynami stacjonarnymi.

  8. Hi my family member! I want to say that this article is amazing, great written and include approximately all important infos. I’d like to see more posts like this .

  9. have already been reading ur blog for a couple of days. really enjoy what you posted. btw i will be doing a report about this topic. do you happen to know any great websites or forums that I can find out more? thanks a lot.

  10. have already been reading ur blog for a couple of days. really enjoy what you posted. btw i will be doing a report about this topic. do you happen to know any great websites or forums that I can find out more? thanks a lot.

  11. If you don’t mind, where do you host your weblog? I am looking for a very good web host and your webpage seams to be extremely fast and up most the time…

  12. Ziimp.com says:

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing in your feed and I am hoping you write again very soon!

  13. You have some helpful ideas! Maybe I should consider doing this by myself.

  14. Thanks for some other great post. Where else may anybody get that kind of information in such an ideal method of writing? I’ve a presentation next week, and I am at the look for such information.

  15. I saw a similar post on another website but the points were not as well articulated.

  16. I am lucky that I discovered this website , precisely the right info that I was searching for! .

  17. I wish I could craft such articles as this. Thank you very much.

  18. Im impressed. I dont think Ive met anyone who knows as much about this subject as you do. Youre truly well informed and very intelligent. You wrote something that people could understand and made the subject intriguing for everyone. Really, great blog youve got here.

  19. Just want to say what a great blog you got here!I’ve been around for quite a lot of time, but finally decided to show my appreciation of your work!

  20. Just want to say what a great blog you got here!I’ve been around for quite a lot of time, but finally decided to show my appreciation of your work!

« Older Comments | Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply