The Ford government’s superficial arguments against pharmacare

Posted on July 12, 2018 in Health Policy Context

—

BehindTheNumbers.ca – 2018/07/11

online pharmacy buy cymbalta with best prices today in the USA

Ontario’s new Progressive Conservative government is rejigging OHIP+, a modest but promising pharmacare policy introduced by the previous Liberal government, allegedly to make more efficient use of tax dollars. Where the short-lived program covered most prescription drug costs for people under 25, OHIP+ will now only cover people without individual or workplace-linked private insurance plans.

On the surface, it may sound reasonable to expect that governments would direct social spending to those who need it more. However, surfaces can often hide what lays beneath. In this case, a surface-level argument for efficiency in the immediate use of tax dollars hides rather important ideological differences between universal and pay-as-you-go services, and obscures some of the large benefits (including extensive efficiency gains) of all-in pharmacare.

First, we must consider the idea of social solidarity, which says that if something bad happens to one of us, no matter who that person is or what their status, society will take care of them. Social solidarity explains (at least partly) why police and fire services are paid for out of the common tax pool, and entirely explains why hospital and doctor services are available to all patients regardless of income and without out-of-pocket payments. Why should payment for medicines be any different?

Second, with respect to the hidden bonuses of universal access, a side effect of having everyone in the same boat is that if something goes wrong, or services aren’t being delivered properly, it’s easier to rock the boat. The wealthy and the privileged have better access to those who control the services and will make sure that their concerns are heard and corrections are made. This only scratches the surface of the myths and misconceptions about public payment for medicines that are concealed below the surface of “efficiency.”

For example, is it actually more efficient to have multiple payers for prescription drugs? It’s true that a national pharmacare plan where everyone would be covered, either run by the federal government alone or by a combination of federal and provincial/territorial governments, will mean more public spending. But it’s also true that overall spending will drop substantially, by as much as $4 billion a year according to the 2017 report from the Parliamentary Budget Office.

That decrease in overall cost is largely because a single payer has much more bargaining powerwith drug companies than hundreds of private payers and the current public plans. We are already paying for our medicines, the question is whether we want to continue to pay more than necessary through multiple payers or less through a single payer?

When it comes to money, we also need to realize that public insurance is much more cost efficient than private insurance. Overhead for public health insurance in Canada is about 2-3% of outlays, whereas, as of 2011, there was a 28% gap in private insurance plans between what they take in as revenue and what they pay out in benefits. The difference is in the amount spent on advertising and the profits of the companies.

Private insurance plans are less efficient. They are less likely to bargain on prices or require generic substitution, and the price that they pay for drugs is not transparent. Private plans are also not uniform. Some have yearly or lifetime caps on benefits, or different requirements for copays (patients pay a fixed amount per prescription), coinsurance (patients pay a percentage of the cost of each prescription) and deductibles (the amount that patients have to pay before they receive any benefits).

Finally, a variety of critics of pharmacare often bemoan the fact that not all drugs that have been approved by Health Canada will be covered. It’s fair to say there will be some expensive drugs or drugs for rare diseases (often the two are the same) that will be left off a national formulary. This speaks to the necessity to have a fair, rapid and evidence-based system to deal with these special circumstances.

But the main reason why most drugs are not covered is that they offer little to no additional therapeutic benefit over existing drugs. Out of the 564 new patented drugs evaluated by the federal Patented Medicine Prices Review Board between 2010 and 2016, only 37 (6.6%) were major advances and an additional 90 (16%) were moderate improvements.

Let’s dispense with superficial arguments about pharmacare and see what really lays below the surface.


Joel Lexchin, MSc, MD, is Professor Emeritus at the School of Health Policy and Management, York University, an emergency physician with the University Health Network, and a CCPA research associate.

http://behindthenumbers.ca/2018/07/11/the-ford-governments-superficial-arguments-against-pharmacare/?utm_source=Ontario+Mailing+List&utm_campaign=7c2908c8b9-&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e98e32d53b-7c2908c8b9-40215997&mc_cid=7c2908c8b9&mc_eid=299b6a00a6

online pharmacy purchase cozaar no prescription with best prices today in the USA
online pharmacy purchase flagyl online no prescription

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 12th, 2018 at 10:00 am and is filed under Health Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

371 Responses to “The Ford government’s superficial arguments against pharmacare”

  1. Keep it up!. I usually don’t post in Blogs but your blog forced me to, amazing work.. beautiful A rise in An increase in An increase in.

  2. of course like your web-site however you have to check the spelling on several of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very troublesome to tell the reality then again I will surely come back again.

  3. That is really fascinating, You’re an excessively skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to in the hunt for extra of your magnificent post. Additionally, I’ve shared your website in my social networks!

  4. How long have you been in this field? You seem to know a lot more than I do, I’d love to know your sources!

  5. Is it okay to put a portion of this on my weblog if perhaps I post a reference point to this web page?

  6. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I want to suggest you some interesting things or suggestions. Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read more things about it!

  7. When are you going to take this to a full book?

  8. Are grateful for this blog post, it’s tough to find good information and facts on the internet

  9. Hello there I am so delighted I found your weblog, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching on Google for something else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say cheers for a remarkable post and a all round exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to browse it all at the moment but I have book-marked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the superb work.

  10. I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.

  11. We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in our community. Your blog provided us with valuable information to work on|.You have done a marvellous job!

  12. I just added this to my favorites. I truly love reading your posts. Tyvm!

  13. I like to spend my free time by scaning various internet recourses. Today I came across your site and I found it is as one of the best free resources available! Well done! Keep on this quality!

  14. Hello there, You have done an incredible job. I will certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this site.

  15. I think this is among the so much vital info for me. And i’m happy reading your article. But wanna remark on few common issues, The site style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent : D. Just right job, cheers

  16. Hi, do have a e-newsletter? In the event you don’t definately should get on that piece…this web site is pure gold!

  17. Hey, I simply hopped over to your website by way of StumbleUpon. No longer one thing I’d normally learn, but I preferred your thoughts none the less. Thanks for making one thing worth reading.

  18. I just couldn’t leave your website before suggesting that I really enjoyed the usual information an individual supply on your visitors? Is gonna be back often in order to investigate cross-check new posts

  19. Its wonderful as your other blog posts : D, regards for putting up.

  20. Nice piece of info! May I reference part of this on my blog if I post a backlink to this webpage? Thx.

« Older Comments | Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply