Ninety dead children
TheStar.com – Opinion/Editorial – Ninety dead children
February 24, 2009
The shocking death of 90 children and teenagers in 2007, all involved with Ontario’s child protection system, cries out for an accounting. Irwin Elman, the province’s child advocate, rightly labels this loss “too high by any standard.” His office is the ideal agency to address these deaths, given its mission to identify threats to vulnerable children and to advocate on their behalf.
But that accounting is being blocked by government officials. Citing privacy concerns, they are refusing to share detailed information with Elman’s office.
In the interests of getting to the bottom of this matter, the barriers to the flow of information must be removed.
The scope of the problem is outlined in the title of Elman’s annual report to the legislature: 90 Deaths: Ninety Voices Silenced. The dead children were teenagers in foster care or whose families had an open file with a children’s aid society or died within a year of such a file being closed. Some were murdered; some killed themselves; some died accidentally. Most of the deaths were very likely preventable.
Responding to accusations of “stonewalling” in the legislature yesterday, Minister of Children and Youth Services Deb Matthews said a protocol on information flow had recently been signed between her department and the office of the child advocate.
While a step forward, that protocol mainly provides a mechanism through which information can be requested. It doesn’t mean that any substantive information will actually be delivered, especially since the information barriers remain in place.
When staffers in Elman’s office tried to look into complaints of physical abuse from a youth held in detention, they were told they had no right to see reports and photographs of the alleged injuries. And when Elman asked to see children’s aid society documents, including a Child Fatality Case Summary Report required after every death, he was again told privacy rules prohibited such releases.
This seems absurd. If this information is available to CAS staff, whose job is to protect and care for vulnerable children, why should it be denied to Ontario’s advocate for children and youth? Ministry officials take the position that they are simply enforcing existing law on privacy. Then the law should be changed.
Fortunately, an avenue to a quick amendment is open, as the legislature is currently considering changes to the Coroners Act. A provision could easily be inserted in that bill giving the child advocate the right to receive detailed information concerning child and youth fatalities.
Queen’s Park should also consider increasing the advocacy agency’s $3.9 million budget. With just 21 people on staff, it is smaller, on a per capita basis, than similar offices in the other provinces.
The loss of even one child is a tragedy. When that loss is multiplied 90 times among children under the government’s care, the tragedy becomes alarming. Privacy concerns and lack of funding won’t silence the alarm bells.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 at 10:59 am and is filed under Child & Family Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
258 Responses to “Ninety dead children”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Ninety dead children
TheStar.com – Opinion/Editorial – Ninety dead children
February 24, 2009
The shocking death of 90 children and teenagers in 2007, all involved with Ontario’s child protection system, cries out for an accounting. Irwin Elman, the province’s child advocate, rightly labels this loss “too high by any standard.” His office is the ideal agency to address these deaths, given its mission to identify threats to vulnerable children and to advocate on their behalf.
But that accounting is being blocked by government officials. Citing privacy concerns, they are refusing to share detailed information with Elman’s office.
In the interests of getting to the bottom of this matter, the barriers to the flow of information must be removed.
The scope of the problem is outlined in the title of Elman’s annual report to the legislature: 90 Deaths: Ninety Voices Silenced. The dead children were teenagers in foster care or whose families had an open file with a children’s aid society or died within a year of such a file being closed. Some were murdered; some killed themselves; some died accidentally. Most of the deaths were very likely preventable.
Responding to accusations of “stonewalling” in the legislature yesterday, Minister of Children and Youth Services Deb Matthews said a protocol on information flow had recently been signed between her department and the office of the child advocate.
While a step forward, that protocol mainly provides a mechanism through which information can be requested. It doesn’t mean that any substantive information will actually be delivered, especially since the information barriers remain in place.
When staffers in Elman’s office tried to look into complaints of physical abuse from a youth held in detention, they were told they had no right to see reports and photographs of the alleged injuries. And when Elman asked to see children’s aid society documents, including a Child Fatality Case Summary Report required after every death, he was again told privacy rules prohibited such releases.
This seems absurd. If this information is available to CAS staff, whose job is to protect and care for vulnerable children, why should it be denied to Ontario’s advocate for children and youth? Ministry officials take the position that they are simply enforcing existing law on privacy. Then the law should be changed.
Fortunately, an avenue to a quick amendment is open, as the legislature is currently considering changes to the Coroners Act. A provision could easily be inserted in that bill giving the child advocate the right to receive detailed information concerning child and youth fatalities.
Queen’s Park should also consider increasing the advocacy agency’s $3.9 million budget. With just 21 people on staff, it is smaller, on a per capita basis, than similar offices in the other provinces.
The loss of even one child is a tragedy. When that loss is multiplied 90 times among children under the government’s care, the tragedy becomes alarming. Privacy concerns and lack of funding won’t silence the alarm bells.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 at 1:00 am and is filed under Child & Family Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
Some genuinely choice content on this site, bookmarked .
Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. It’s important to cover these trends.
Hi, possibly i’m being a little off topic here, but I was browsing your site and it looks stimulating. I’m writing a blog and trying to make it look neat, but everytime I touch it I mess something up. Did you design the blog yourself?
Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that.|
Is it okay to put a portion of this on my weblog if perhaps I post a reference point to this web page?
You are my inspiration , I possess few web logs and very sporadically run out from to brand 🙁
Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that.|
I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your future updates. The usefulness and significance is overwhelming and has been invaluable to me!
Just wanna admit that this is extremely helpful, Thanks for taking your time to write this.
I dont think I’ve read anything like this before. So good to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. cheers for starting this up. This blog is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality.
I had highly recommend this blog to my good friend, it’s so good
Hi there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing several weeks of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any solutions to protect against hackers?
thank, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your article. I really appreciate your wonderful knowledge and the time you put into educating the rest of us.
The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish.
Saw your material, and hope you publish more soon.
I wrote down your blog in my bookmark. I hope that it somehow did not fall and continues to be a great place for reading texts.
How come you do not have your website viewable in mobile format? cant see anything in my Droid.
Advanced reading here!
It’s continually awesome when you can not only be informed, but also entertained! I’m sure you had fun writing this article. Regards, Clotilde.
We’re developing some community services to respond to this, and your blog is helpful.