Missing pieces in Ontario budget
Posted on March 29, 2009 in Child & Family Debates, Debates, Education Debates, Social Security Debates
—
TheStar.com – Opinion – Missing pieces in Ontario budget
March 29, 2009
Last week’s provincial budget covered a lot of ground with a harmonized sales tax to boost business and enhanced child benefits and tax credits for low-income families. But the $109 billion budget still didn’t manage to meet all the needs of a province seeking to reduce poverty and create jobs.
Affordable daycare, for one, was left out, notwithstanding the fact that it would both reduce poverty and stimulate employment. Expanded daycare would create jobs for child-care workers, enable parents to retrain for better jobs so they can participate in the knowledge economy that Ontario’s future depends on, and help single mothers lift their families out of poverty through work.
There was no funding in the budget to maintain the 22,000 daycare spaces slated to close due to expiring federal dollars, let alone to pay for badly needed expansion. The budget simply reiterated the province’s call for Ottawa to continue its funding for these spaces.
Yes, Ottawa should pay. But the federal budget has come and gone without the $63 million necessary to keep these spaces open.
What about the 4,000 child-care workers who will lose their jobs if those spaces close? And what of the families who will soon be told their child’s daycare space no longer exists? Ontario should fund those spaces until it gets Ottawa back to the table.
The budget was also silent on the $100 monthly food supplement advocated by anti-poverty activists, even though there is overwhelming evidence that it’s impossible to pay the rent and buy anything resembling healthy food with the $572 a month allocated to a single person on welfare. Instead, the province offered just $11.44 a month more through a 2 per cent hike in social assistance rates.
Studies have drawn a link between poverty and increased incidence of illness, so we’re paying now through our health-care system. Helping welfare recipients to buy fresh fruit and vegetables instead of cheap carbohydrates would be a more efficient way to spend the money.
There are a great many welfare rules that hold people back instead of helping them, but the budget failed to address one of the most egregious: the requirement that needy people first use up most of their assets before they can qualify for welfare.
“If you are a single individual, you do not qualify for welfare if you have liquid assets of over $572,” notes TD Bank economist Don Drummond. “What the welfare officer will tell (you) is that you need to deplete your lifetime savings and come back to us when you are destitute.” This serves no one’s interests as it makes a quick exit from welfare that much more difficult.
Finally, with growing concerns about climate change, there was some rhetoric in the budget speech about “tak(ing) advantage of Ontario’s emerging green economy.”
But the budget contained a curious anomaly: more money will be spent over the next two years on expanding highways ($3.75 billion) than on transit projects ($3.2 billion). This hardly seems like a green alignment of priorities.
In sum, Thursday’s budget was a bold document for tough times, but several opportunities were missed to do more.
This entry was posted on Sunday, March 29th, 2009 at 10:50 am and is filed under Child & Family Debates, Debates, Education Debates, Social Security Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
331 Responses to “Missing pieces in Ontario budget”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
Saw your material, and hope you publish more soon.
With internet full of dupe articles it is nice to find original content like yours thank you so very much.
I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but I’m glad I visited. I will post a link to this site on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.
Sometimes, the sheer magnitude of the information seems overwhelming.
Some genuinely choice content on this site, bookmarked .
Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Therefore let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!
I appreciate, cause I found just what I was looking for. You’ve ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye -.
What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to contribute & help other users like its aided me. Great job.
I am glad to be a visitor of this perfect blog !, appreciate it for this rare info!
Hello, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Chrome, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, awesome blog!
Public policy is key here, and our states need to develop some strategies – – soon.
I found your blog through google and I must say, this is probably one of the best well prepared articles I have come across in a long time. I have bookmarked your site for more posts.
Just stumble upon your blog from from time to time. nice article
Just came from google to your website have to say thanks.
With internet full of dupe articles it is nice to find original content like yours thank you so very much.
I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.
Peculiar this blog is totaly unrelated to what I was searching for – – interesting to see you’re well indexed in the search engines.
That is really fascinating, You’re an excessively skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to in the hunt for extra of your magnificent post. Additionally, I’ve shared your website in my social networks!
It’s time for communities to rally.
It sounds like you’re creating problems yourself by defining this as such a comprehensive, almost unknowable problem. Isn’t that self-defeating?