Boards prep for kindergarten rush

Posted on January 13, 2010 in Education Debates

—

TheStar.com – Ontario/Parentcentral.ca – Boards prep for kindergarten rush
January 13, 2010.   Kristin Rushowy, Rob Ferguson

Let the registrations begin.

Now that boards across the province know which schools will offer full-day kindergarten this fall, some are turning their attention to how to handle the expected surge in demand for the new program that could save working parents thousands a year in daycare costs for their 4- and 5-year-olds.

An official in Premier Dalton McGuinty’s office said after Tuesday’s announcement, which named the almost-600 schools in the first phase, that individual boards must decide what to do if demand exceeds spots. Kindergarten registration revs up this month and next, and lotteries might be an answer.

“We can’t afford to fund all of this instantly,” McGuinty said at an elementary school in Chatham.

“We’d ask those parents to be patient.”

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board already has a detailed plan, calling for a lottery rather than a first-come, first-served system in cases of great demand. Spots would be guaranteed for children with older siblings already at a school that is offering the full-day program. Those who don’t get in will be bused to a half-day spot at another school, at no cost.

If the full day is offered at the local school and parents only want half, their children will have to go elsewhere for kindergarten but can return in Grade 1, said Marianne Mazzorato, superintendent of program.

In York Region, only families living in the district will be eligible for the full day at 25 schools, said spokesman Ross Virgo.

At the Durham District School Board – where kindergarten registration began Tuesday just as the schools were being announced – in the rare case that a school cannot accommodate local children the board will work with the ministry to solve the problem, said superintendent Lisa Millar.

Karen Grose, a system superintendent with the Toronto District School Board, said lotteries are possible, but “the first challenge is to measure the demand for the program.”

Full-day learning will cost the province $500 million in the first two years, rising to an estimated $1.5 billion when it is fully phased in for 240,000 children in 2015.

Critics, however, have said it will cost much more.

Addressing criticism that the province isn’t giving boards enough funds to cover the actual salaries of teachers and early childhood educators – who are to work together to provide the full-day curriculum – McGuinty said that another 3,800 teachers and 20,000 ECEs will be needed but that boards should not end up financially in the hole to hire them.

Both McGuinty and Education Minister Kathleen Wynne on Tuesday called on boards to also offer user-pay summer care and holiday programming for children, which critics have said is the gaping hole in the full-day plan.

“The Premier’s recognition that school boards should offer the summertime extended program is critical,” said Charles Pascal, the province’s early learning adviser.

“Good for kids and cost-effective for parents, and based on a cost-recovery model, it’s a no-brainer for the boards to provide this.”

At Market Lane Public School, parent Maighan MCeary, 26, said her 4-year-old and 3-year-old are ready for the full day. And it comes with an added benefit.

“I can’t wait to get out and find a job,” she said.

With files from Brendan Kennedy

< http://www.parentcentral.ca/parent/education/earlylearning/article/749973–boards-prep-for-kindergarten-rush >

online pharmacy https://blackstonevalleyprep.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/1.html no prescription

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 13th, 2010 at 12:00 am and is filed under Education Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

320 Responses to “Boards prep for kindergarten rush”

  1. money 6x.com says:

    I dont think I’ve read anything like this before. So good to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. cheers for starting this up. This blog is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality.

  2. There are some serious financial ramifications here.

  3. I am very happy to look your post. Thanks a lot and i am taking a look ahead to touch you.

  4. sutbongtv says:

    This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post. Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks!

  5. Excellent article!! I am an avid reader of your website:D keep on posting that good content. and I’ll be a regular visitor for a very long time!!

  6. I’ll check back after you publish more articles.

  7. A colleague in the field told me to check out your website.

  8. sutbongtv says:

    Very Interesting Information! Thank You For Thi Information!

  9. Invest1now says:

    Our communities really need to deal with this.

  10. Money6x.com says:

    Nice piece of info! May I reference part of this on my blog if I post a backlink to this webpage? Thx.

  11. Its just like you read my thoughts! It’s like reading about my family.

  12. I saw a similar post on another website but the points were not as well articulated.

  13. Have you always been concerned about these issues?

  14. Certainly. And I have faced it. Let’s discuss this question. Here or in PM.

  15. Thanks , I’ve recently been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far. But, what concerning the bottom line? Are you certain concerning the source?

  16. KUBET says:

    It’s time for communities to rally.

  17. KUBET says:

    Nice piece of info! May I reference part of this on my blog if I post a backlink to this webpage? Thx.

  18. dwin68 bond says:

    Great blog here! Also your site loads up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

  19. phising says:

    It sounds like you’re creating problems yourself by defining this as such a comprehensive, almost unknowable problem. Isn’t that self-defeating?

  20. Does it look like we’re in for a big ride here?

« Older Comments | Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply