When it comes to the census, markets fail
Posted on July 21, 2010 in Governance Debates
Source: National Post — Authors: Stephen Gordon
NationalPost.com – Full Comment
July 21, 2010. Stephen Gordon
One of the surprising things about the census fiasco is that of all the publicy-provided services that small-government advocates could target, the census is very near the bottom of the list of priorities. Many of the services provided by governments could and perhaps should be produced by the private sector. But the economics of databases such as the census aren’t the same as the goods that inhabit most economic models, and so the standard market-is-best results of the First and Second Welfare Theorems don’t apply. When it comes to things like the census, markets fail.
Standard public finance theory offers two dimensions in which goods can be classified: rivalry and excludability. If a good is a purely private – that is, rival and excludable – then the welfare theorems apply, and there’s no obvious case for government intervention. But a database is different. Although intellectual property laws can provide a mechanism for owners to control access, it is non-rival: many users can benefit from a database just as easily as one can.
You can see why this means that markets would generate inefficient outcomes here: firms that require certain information would be obliged to produce multiple data sets, all serving pretty much the same purpose. The inefficiency takes the form of this duplication of efforts. It’s more efficient to simply have one database and allow access to multiple users. In other words, the census is a natural monopoly.
But what pricing strategy should the census monopolist adopt? Usually, we’d try to set price equal to marginal cost. In this case, the marginal cost of providing access to a database is essentially zero: once it is set up, maintenance costs are trivial. So in an ideal situation, the census would become a pure public good: universal access at zero cost.
This is pretty much the model adopted by the United States. A trip to the websites of the Bureau of Economic Analysis or the Bureau of Labor Statistics will get you a wealth of data at the price of a couple of mouse clicks. And over at the Census Bureau, fees only seem to be incurred by those whose projects require working at their offices in Washington; I can’t see any mention of fees for access to the data per se. (Readers more familiar with these matters will correct me if I’ve read things incorrectly.)
Read the rest here
Stephen Gordon is a professor of economics at l’Université Laval in Quebec City, Canada and a fellow of the Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l’emploi. He is co-author of the blog site, Worthwhile Canadian Initiative.
< http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/07/21/stephen-gordon-when-it-comes-to-the-census-markets-fail/ >
Tags: participation, rights
This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 21st, 2010 at 12:02 pm and is filed under Governance Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
132 Responses to “When it comes to the census, markets fail”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
That’s some inspirational stuff. Never knew that opinions might be this varied. Thanks for all the enthusiasm to supply such helpful information here.
It’s continually awesome when you can not only be informed, but also entertained! I’m sure you had fun writing this article. Regards, Clotilde.
I’m so happy to read this. This is the type of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that’s at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this best doc.
When are you going to take this to a full book?
Wish I’d thought of this. Am in the field, but I procrastinate alot and haven’t written as much as I’d like. Thanks.
Just came from google to your website have to say thanks.
I am very happy to look your post. Thanks a lot and i am taking a look ahead to touch you.
Great write-up, I am a big believer in placing comments on sites to inform the blog writers know that they’ve added something advantageous to the world wide web!
Thank you for the auspicious writeup.
Just wanna admit that this is extremely helpful, Thanks for taking your time to write this.
That’s some inspirational stuff. Never knew that opinions might be this varied. Thanks for all the enthusiasm to supply such helpful information here.
whoah this weblog is great i really like studying your articles. Stay up the great work! You already know, lots of persons are looking round for this information, you can aid them greatly.
Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. It’s important to cover these trends.
Assume you are doing good linking to position you on the first pages of search engines.
I dont think I’ve read anything like this before. So good to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. cheers for starting this up. This blog is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality.
Thank you a lot for sharing this with all folks you actually recognize what you’re speaking about! Bookmarked. Please additionally visit my site =). We can have a hyperlink trade contract among us!
Unquestionably believe that which you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the net the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people consider worries that they plainly don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail on the head. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks
513292 955600Hey! I simply wish to give an enormous thumbs up for the great details youve got here on this post. I will likely be coming back to your weblog for much more soon. 707217
Makes sense to me.
it is a really nice point of view. I usually meet people who rather say what they suppose others want to hear. Good and well written! I will come back to your site for sure!