When it comes to the census, markets fail
Posted on July 21, 2010 in Governance Debates
Source: National Post — Authors: Stephen Gordon
NationalPost.com – Full Comment
July 21, 2010. Stephen Gordon
One of the surprising things about the census fiasco is that of all the publicy-provided services that small-government advocates could target, the census is very near the bottom of the list of priorities. Many of the services provided by governments could and perhaps should be produced by the private sector. But the economics of databases such as the census aren’t the same as the goods that inhabit most economic models, and so the standard market-is-best results of the First and Second Welfare Theorems don’t apply. When it comes to things like the census, markets fail.
Standard public finance theory offers two dimensions in which goods can be classified: rivalry and excludability. If a good is a purely private – that is, rival and excludable – then the welfare theorems apply, and there’s no obvious case for government intervention. But a database is different. Although intellectual property laws can provide a mechanism for owners to control access, it is non-rival: many users can benefit from a database just as easily as one can.
You can see why this means that markets would generate inefficient outcomes here: firms that require certain information would be obliged to produce multiple data sets, all serving pretty much the same purpose. The inefficiency takes the form of this duplication of efforts. It’s more efficient to simply have one database and allow access to multiple users. In other words, the census is a natural monopoly.
But what pricing strategy should the census monopolist adopt? Usually, we’d try to set price equal to marginal cost. In this case, the marginal cost of providing access to a database is essentially zero: once it is set up, maintenance costs are trivial. So in an ideal situation, the census would become a pure public good: universal access at zero cost.
This is pretty much the model adopted by the United States. A trip to the websites of the Bureau of Economic Analysis or the Bureau of Labor Statistics will get you a wealth of data at the price of a couple of mouse clicks. And over at the Census Bureau, fees only seem to be incurred by those whose projects require working at their offices in Washington; I can’t see any mention of fees for access to the data per se. (Readers more familiar with these matters will correct me if I’ve read things incorrectly.)
Read the rest here
Stephen Gordon is a professor of economics at l’Université Laval in Quebec City, Canada and a fellow of the Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l’emploi. He is co-author of the blog site, Worthwhile Canadian Initiative.
< http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/07/21/stephen-gordon-when-it-comes-to-the-census-markets-fail/ >
Tags: participation, rights
This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 21st, 2010 at 12:02 pm and is filed under Governance Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
62 Responses to “When it comes to the census, markets fail”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
What a great article.. i subscribed btw!
Hi, I just hopped over to your web-site through StumbleUpon. Not somthing I might typically browse, but I liked your views none the less. Thanks for making something worthy of reading through.
Thank you, I have just been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered till now. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?
Hiya, I am really glad I have found this information. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossip and net stuff and this is actually frustrating.
You are a very smart person! 🙂
I am glad to be a visitor of this thoroughgoing web blog ! , regards for this rare information! .
951831 422830A really exciting examine, I might possibly not concur entirely, but you do make some actually legitimate points. 692671
Amazing content on your website.
Does it look like we’re in for a big ride here?
We’re developing some community services to respond to this, and your blog is helpful.
Oh my goodness! an amazing article. Great work.
I like this weblog very much so much great info .
I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing issues with your site. It appears as though some of the written text on your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before. Appreciate it
This is definitely a wonderful webpage, thanks a lot..
Thank you a lot for sharing this with all folks you actually recognize what you’re speaking about! Bookmarked. Please additionally visit my site =). We can have a hyperlink trade contract among us!
221348 230816I discovered your blog site on google and appearance several of your early posts. Maintain up the excellent operate. I merely extra the RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Looking for forward to reading far more on your part later on! 740882
This is an awesome entry. Thank you very much for the supreme post provided! I was looking for this entry for a long time, but I wasn’t able to find a honest source.
I think other website proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and great user pleasant style and design .
Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I wish to put in writing like this moreover taking time and precise effort to make an excellent article! I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.
Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!