Archive for the ‘Governance’ Category

« Older Entries | Newer Entries »

What a Liberal victory would mean for Canada’s economic policies

Friday, October 16th, 2015

a minority government… would most likely require the support of the NDP to win confidence votes. The NDP will expect to see some of its policies implemented in exchange. The economic platforms of the two parties have significant overlap in terms of priorities, such as expanding the Canada Pension Plan, maintaining the age for qualifying for Old Age Security at 65, cutting the small-business tax rate from 11 per cent to 9 per cent, spending more on infrastructure and working with the provinces on a more aggressive approach to climate change.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Democratic Accountability

Thursday, October 15th, 2015

… on the economy, on defence and security, and on social policy, a free-market, hawkish, moderately libertarian newspaper would be hard-pressed to prefer the offerings of the Liberals and the NDP to the Conservatives. The same cannot be said for the government’s record on democracy, ethics and accountability.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Campaign 2015 forced Canadians to face hard truths

Wednesday, October 14th, 2015

The racial and religious harmony on which we pride ourselves is more tenuous than many of us realized. / We are willing to settle for “economic stability” rather than growth. / We have embraced the notion that strengthening the middle class is the role of government [marginalizing those who truly need help]. / Our humanitarian instincts remain strong [concerning refugees]. / We’re becoming a do-it-yourself nation. / We haven’t figured out how to keep our priorities — health care, the environment, our children’s future — on the election agenda.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


High-road approach may pay off for Liberals

Wednesday, October 14th, 2015

The Liberal Leader has spoken often about his desire to reach out, to bring Canadians together. It sounds hokey, but it contrasts with the Conservatives, who acknowledge their fondness for divisive wedge issues… [As to] Mr. Harper’s autocratic tendencies… 587 [academics have issued an open letter in protest against tactics “that betray the values of mutual respect and toleration that lie at the heart of civil democratic discourse.”

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Ten years of attacks on dissent & debate in Canada

Tuesday, October 13th, 2015

… this graphic, show[s] over 110 organizations, individuals, laws, acts, public services & democratic institutions that, since 2006, have been vilified, defunded, smeared, gutted, spied on, slashed or criminalized by the Canadian government… To read the case studies, visit our Hit List. And for the bigger picture, make sure to read our report Dismantling Democracy: Stifling debate & dissent in Canada.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Thanks to the Tories, and you, taxpayers, for all this money you’re sending me

Tuesday, October 13th, 2015

The Fraser Institute… identified 68 tax credits whose elimination would bring in an extra $20 billion a year to the federal coffers… as it’s been having all of you good people chip in a few hundred bucks to send my toddler to gymnastics, this is good policy. Some might even call it good conservative policy. Why the are the Liberals the only ones proposing moving us even vaguely in that general direction?

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Governance Policy Context | No Comments »


How Stephen Harper changed the character of Canada

Saturday, October 10th, 2015

One by one, Canadians have lost the tools they need to understand what their government is doing and make informed choices about the future… “Small” changes add up. They transform the face of a nation and the character of its people. They prevent Canadians from finding out what is being done in their name, with their dollars. They erode empathy and trust. Please don’t shrug. This matters. Where the trajectory goes from here is up to us.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


King Stephen has changed Canada for the worse

Thursday, October 8th, 2015

… incapable of rising above partisanship. He is forever manipulating the system… How he operates is a function of who he is… biographers portray him as hot-tempered, foul-mouthed, paranoid, suspicious, secretive, mean and vindictive. Dubbed an elected dictator, he has run a one-man government… Adversaries are enemies, to be vanquished. Premiers are to be avoided, insulted… When the judges don’t do his bidding, he insults them…

Tags:
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


My days as a Conservative are over; I’m a democrat

Sunday, October 4th, 2015

Fiscally and philosophically I am conservative. In past I have supported, campaigned for and voted for Conservative candidates. However, after watching Prime Minister Harper surreptitiously and inexorably dismantling democracy in my wonderful country over the past decade; no longer. I am above all a democrat… This is the man who in opposition railed against lack of openness by the previous government and promised transparency if elected, yet has produced the most secretive government in memory.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Governance Debates | No Comments »


Yes, let’s have an election on citizenship

Friday, October 2nd, 2015

Citizenship is weird. It is not one of those “Canadian values,” about which party leaders love to debate. It is rather the precondition for participating in those debates. In other words, citizenship is a right. As a right, you either have it or you don’t. If you have it, it can’t be taken away by someone with power, just because you don’t accept their notion of Canadian values — as you might remove it from them, if you had the power, because they didn’t conform to your values chart.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Governance Policy Context | No Comments »


« Older Entries | Newer Entries »