“Public Option” Could Fill Gaps in Dental Coverage

Posted on in Health Policy Context

CDHowe.org – Media Release
May 3, 2018.  Åke BlomqvistFrances Woolley

Lack of access to even urgent dental care for many people with low income, seniors and others is a problem that could be solved with a “public option” for dental insurance, according to a new report published by the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Filling the Cavities: Improving the Efficiency and Equity of Canada’s Dental Care System,” authors Åke Blomqvist and Frances Woolley argue that provincial governments should strengthen and expand existing public dental programs and start moving toward some form of universal dental insurance, perhaps through a mixed system where people can choose between a public plan and private coverage.

“Many Canadians today, including most of the working poor and the retired, are covered neither by government programs nor by private insurance. Lack of coverage is likely to worsen in the next decade as the babyboom generation retires and loses insurance coverage, and as more Canadians work in the gig economy, where insurance benefits are rare,” says Blomqvist.

Poor oral health may lead to substantial reductions in quality of life, disadvantage workers in the labour market, and also is responsible for a significant amount of costly visits to emergency rooms and primary-care physicians. There is even research to suggest that lack of access to dental care may be linked to increased heart disease, strokes, and certain forms of cancer. Ensuring that all members of the community have access to urgently needed healthcare is a central objective of Canadian social policy. In other countries with universal health insurance plans such as France and the U.K., these plans include dental coverage. Canada should follow these examples, says the report.

A straightforward way of creating universality would be to gradually expand and merge existing public plans until everyone in the population was covered. However, universality does not necessarily mean that everyone must be insured through the same plan. As an alternative, the authors explore a mixed model with competition between private and public insurance. Increased competition could help make the dentistry sector more efficient and reduce the cost of dental care which has continued to increase in recent years, even though the supply of dental care has expanded faster than the population. They also examine possible stumbling blocks in developing a broader public insurance plan, for example, controversies over what should be covered, and how new  payment models and regulation could encourage more efficient service delivery in both the private and public sectors.

Click here for the full report


Tags: , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 3rd, 2018 at 10:34 am and is filed under Health Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply