Protesters Against Wall Street
Posted on October 16, 2011 in Equality Debates
Source: New York Times — Authors: Editorial
NYTimes.com – 2011/10/09/opinion
Published: October 8, 2011.
As the Occupy Wall Street protests spread from Lower Manhattan to Washington and other cities, the chattering classes keep complaining that the marchers lack a clear message and specific policy prescriptions. The message — and the solutions — should be obvious to anyone who has been paying attention since the economy went into a recession that continues to sock the middle class while the rich have recovered and prospered. The problem is that no one in Washington has been listening.
At this point, protest is the message: income inequality is grinding down that middle class, increasing the ranks of the poor, and threatening to create a permanent underclass of able, willing but jobless people. On one level, the protesters, most of them young, are giving voice to a generation of lost opportunity.
The jobless rate for college graduates under age 25 has averaged 9.6 percent over the past year; for young high school graduates, the average is 21.6 percent. Those figures do not reflect graduates who are working but in low-paying jobs that do not even require diplomas. Such poor prospects in the early years of a career portend a lifetime of diminished prospects and lower earnings — the very definition of downward mobility.
The protests, though, are more than a youth uprising. The protesters’ own problems are only one illustration of the ways in which the economy is not working for most Americans. They are exactly right when they say that the financial sector, with regulators and elected officials in collusion, inflated and profited from a credit bubble that burst, costing millions of Americans their jobs, incomes, savings and home equity. As the bad times have endured, Americans have also lost their belief in redress and recovery.
The initial outrage has been compounded by bailouts and by elected officials’ hunger for campaign cash from Wall Street, a toxic combination that has reaffirmed the economic and political power of banks and bankers, while ordinary Americans suffer.
Extreme inequality is the hallmark of a dysfunctional economy, dominated by a financial sector that is driven as much by speculation, gouging and government backing as by productive investment.
When the protesters say they represent 99 percent of Americans, they are referring to the concentration of income in today’s deeply unequal society. Before the recession, the share of income held by those in the top 1 percent of households was 23.5 percent, the highest since 1928 and more than double the 10 percent level of the late 1970s.
That share declined slightly as financial markets tanked in 2008, and updated data is not yet available, but inequality has almost certainly resurged. In the last few years, for instance, corporate profits (which flow largely to the wealthy) have reached their highest level as a share of the economy since 1950, while worker pay as a share of the economy is at its lowest point since the mid-1950s.
Income gains at the top would not be as worrisome as they are if the middle class and the poor were also gaining. But working-age households saw their real income decline in the first decade of this century. The recession and its aftermath have only accelerated the decline.
Research shows that such extreme inequality correlates to a host of ills, including lower levels of educational attainment, poorer health and less public investment. It also skewspolitical power, because policy almost invariably reflects the views of upper-income Americans versus those of lower-income Americans.
No wonder then that Occupy Wall Street has become a magnet for discontent. There are plenty of policy goals to address the grievances of the protesters — including lasting foreclosure relief, a financial transactions tax, greater legal protection for workers’ rights, and more progressive taxation. The country needs a shift in the emphasis of public policy from protecting the banks to fostering full employment, including public spending for job creation and development of a strong, long-term strategy to increase domestic manufacturing.
It is not the job of the protesters to draft legislation. That’s the job of the nation’s leaders, and if they had been doing it all along there might not be a need for these marches and rallies. Because they have not, the public airing of grievances is a legitimate and important end in itself. It is also the first line of defense against a return to the Wall Street ways that plunged the nation into an economic crisis from which it has yet to emerge.
< http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/opinion/sunday/protesters-against-wall-street.html?scp=1&sq=Protesters%20Against%20Wall%20Street&st=Search >
Tags: economy, featured, globalization, ideology, standard of living
This entry was posted on Sunday, October 16th, 2011 at 10:00 pm and is filed under Equality Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
150 Responses to “Protesters Against Wall Street”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Recent Comments
Spot on with this write-up, I actually assume this website needs far more consideration. I will in all probability be once more to learn rather more, thanks for that info.
I like meeting utile info, this post has got me even more info!
Cherished is likely to be what people say about your comments.
Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is wonderful, let alone the content!
This is one very informative blog. I like the way you write and I will bookmark your blog to my favorites.
Thank you pertaining to sharing the following great subject matter on your website. I ran into it on google. I am going to check to come back after you publish additional aricles.
This information is very important and you’ll need to know this when you constructor your own photo voltaic panel.
Simply wish to say the frankness in your article is surprising.
I am glad to be a visitor on this website!, regards for this rare information!
A colleague in the field told me to check out your website.
There are some serious financial ramifications here.
I love your blog. It looks every informative.
I discovered your weblog site on google and verify just a few of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the very good operate. I simply further up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader.
The start of a fast-growing trend?
I am glad to be a visitor on this website!, regards for this rare information!
I have been surfing online more than three hours today, yet I never found anything that grabbed my interest as much as this piece.
Nice post.Very useful info specifically the last part 🙂 Thank you and good luck.
Aktualny przegląd promocji na 2026 rok obejmuje kasyna online, które oferują bonus bez depozytu w formie darmowych spinów, dodatkowych środków lub pakietu łączonego. Pokazujemy, jak aktywować ofertę, jakie wymagania obrotu trzeba spełnić oraz które limity wypłat warto sprawdzić przed rozpoczęciem gry. Bonus bez depozytu za utworzenie konta pozostaje jedną z najpopularniejszych promocji w kasynach online. Pozwala nowym użytkownikom przetestować platformę, dostępne gry kasynowe oraz obsługę konta bez konieczności dokonywania pierwszej wpłaty. Przygotowując ranking najlepszych kasyn z bonusami bez depozytu 2026, porównaliśmy aktualne propozycje operatorów, w tym oferty Roman Casino i NV Casino.
Easily, the post is really the greatest on this laudable topic. I concur with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your future updates. Saying thank will not just be sufficient, for the wonderful c lucidity in your writing. I will instantly grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Solid work and much success in your business enterprise!
I like your style!