How to Break Up the Logjam over Pharmacare
CDHowe.org – media-release – An expanded federal role in financing pharmacare would set the stage for wider coverage and greater cooperation in drug pricing.
October 21, 2015. Åke Blomqvist and Colin Busby
An expanded federal role in financing pharmacare would set the stage for wider coverage and greater cooperation in drug pricing, states a new report from the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Feasible Pharmacare in the Federation: A Proposal to Break the Gridlock,” authors Åke Blomqvist and Colin Busby propose a politically affordable way forward to start addressing the runaway drug prices paid by Canadians.
“Pharmacare is a top-of-mind issue for many Canadians,” states Blomqvist. “As a share of overall health costs, prescribed drugs rose from 6.3 percent in 1975 to 13.4 percent in 2014,” he adds. There is also widespread agreement among provincial premiers and health policymakers that Canadians need improvements to the existing arrangements for drug policies.
The authors concur that, every province, no matter its size, should ensure that no one fails to fill a prescription because of lack of financial means. However, they caution that in considering how this could be accomplished, one must pay close attention to the additional burden that such an initiative would put on government budgets, which will be increasingly strained as Canada’s babyboomers retire and working-age taxpayers become a smaller share of the population.
The report proposes instead a less costly federal initiative under which a substantial share of total drug costs would continue to be privately funded, but in which the main problems – gaps in access, the high cost of pharmaceuticals and varied provincial coverage – would be eased. Under this initiative, the federal government would:
transfer additional funds to provinces whose existing or new pharmacare programs respect minimal conditions for an income-tested upper limit on annual family payments, and the timing of such payments;
– become a partner in an expanded version of the Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (PCPA);
– cooperate with provinces on a model drug formulary and financing of exceptionally high drug costs for patients with certain “rare diseases”; and
– work with the provinces to improve quality of prescriptions.
Because it would rely on a combination of public and private coverage, this approach would imply less cost and risks to provincial governments than a single-payer public monopoly model. Further, because it builds directly on existing provincial plans, it would stand a better chance of overcoming the political hurdles.
“None of the provincial models that exist today are perfect, but some are better than others and we think it is time to break the political gridlock and start moving towards a model that makes important inroads into the biggest shortcomings of the expensive and flawed system we have today,” conclude the authors.
Click here for full report: < https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/e-brief_217_0.pdf >
The C.D. Howe Institute is an independent not-for-profit research institute whose mission is to raise living standards by fostering economically sound public policies. It is Canada’s trusted source of essential policy intelligence, distinguished by research that is nonpartisan, evidence-based and subject to definitive expert review. It is considered by many to be Canada’s most influential think tank.
For more information contact: Åke Blomqvist, Adjunct Research Professor at Carleton University, and Health Policy Scholar, C.D. Howe Institute; Colin Busby, Senior Policy Analyst, C.D. Howe Institute; 416-865-1904, or email: amcbrien@cdhowe.org.
< https://www.cdhowe.org/media-release/how-break-logjam-over-pharmacare >
Tags: economy, featured, Health, ideology, jurisdiction, mental Health, pharmaceutical, standard of living
This entry was posted on Friday, October 23rd, 2015 at 2:47 pm and is filed under Health Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
60 Responses to “How to Break Up the Logjam over Pharmacare”
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
Simply want to say your article is as amazing. The clarity in your post is just great and i can assume you’re an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the gratifying work.
Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thank you
Have you always been concerned about these issues?
This is one very informative blog. I like the way you write and I will bookmark your blog to my favorites.
I love what you’ve created here, this is definitely one of my favorite sites to visit.
Excellent article!! I am an avid reader of your website:D keep on posting that good content. and I’ll be a regular visitor for a very long time!!
I had highly recommend this blog to my good friend, it’s so good
I’m so happy to read this. This is the type of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that’s at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this best doc.
Thanks For This Blog, was added to my bookmarks.
What made you first develop an interest in this topic?
Hiya, I am really glad I have found this information. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossip and net stuff and this is actually frustrating.
A neighbor of mine encouraged me to take a look at your blog site couple weeks ago, given that we both love similar stuff and I will need to say I am quite impressed.
How do I subscribe to your blog? Thanks for your help.
We absolutely love your blog and find the majority of your post’s to be exactly what I’m looking for. Do you offer guest writers to write content to suit your needs? I wouldn’t mind composing a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects you write about here. Again, awesome weblog!
Hey, I simply hopped over to your website by way of StumbleUpon. No longer one thing I’d normally learn, but I preferred your thoughts none the less. Thanks for making one thing worth reading.
I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.
We’re developing a conference, and it looks like you would be a great speaker.
My coder is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on numerous websites for about a year and am nervous about switching to another platform. I have heard great things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into it? Any help would be really appreciated!
Substantially, the post is really the best on this laudable topic. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly watch forward to your future updates.Just saying thanx will not just be enough, for the wonderful lucidity in your writing.
I discovered your weblog site on google and verify just a few of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the very good operate. I simply further up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader.