How Canada got a step closer to taming its big fiscal beast
TheGlobeandMail.com – ROB/Commentary
Mar. 08, 2016. Dylan Marando
Dylan Marando is a PhD student at the University of Toronto and a former adviser in the Office of the Premier of Ontario.
On Feb. 23, the Department of Finance made the unprecedented decision to release tax expenditure figures in database format. You may not have felt the tremor, but this liberation of hitherto cloistered information was earth-moving in the world of Canadian public finance. It has brought us one step closer to understanding and thus taming Canada’s most unwieldy fiscal beast – a hidden multibillion-dollar boondoggle born from an excessive politicization of public policy.
For years now, the government has been drifting toward the use of tax expenditure as a means of policy, and we have lacked the tools to analyze what’s happening. Colloquially known as boutique tax breaks, benefits, or loopholes, this policy instrument has generated programs such as the Public Transit Tax Credit and the Children’s Fitness Tax Credit. Measures such as these are thought to incentivize desired behaviours through targeted tax relief.
It sounds simple, almost like a tax cut. But, in fact, these budgetary boogeymen are subsidies to the select few, often conveniently benefiting the sorts of voters that form the support base of the political powers that be. Many tax expenditures, but thankfully not all, are disproportionately beneficial to the wealthy given their countervailing effect on the progressivity of the income tax system. Research by Ben Sand and Peter Taylor for the Frontier Centre For Public Policy notes that the top income quartile in Canada claims 43 per cent of the value for the aforementioned public transit credit and 71 per cent of the value for the children’s fitness credit.
As the Parliamentary Budget Office reported, already in 2009 there were 189 of these programs, costing the government more than $100-billion a year and representing an astounding 7.5 per cent of gross domestic product. The cost of tax expenditures is greater than the voted appropriations of the federal government.
More troubling, tax expenditures are invisible in the policy discourse. They are not reported in the budget. There is no statutory obligation to review them. As far back as 1976, those skeptical of the tool’s stubborn opacity and growing power asked the government to inform Parliament of costs and benefits. The parliamentary secretary to the minister of finance rose and said: “The information requested is not generated routinely in the regular processing of taxation data. To obtain this information would require special data processing the cost of which would be several thousand dollars. Answering the question would thus be prohibitively expensive.”
Amazingly, that answer was the standard for 40 years. The government did not start reporting on tax expenditures in any form until 1979. It was not until 1994 that the Department of Finance began publishing estimates; even then, the information that came was highly unusable.
In an analysis from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Canada’s former chief statistician said of the programs: “Taxpayers neither know accurately how much tax they are paying nor do they have any knowledge of the many ways their tax dollars are being spent, and with what effectiveness.” In the United States, critics have been sounding alarms for years. Cornell University professor Suzanne Mettler argues that tax expenditures create a “submerged state” that detaches the public from policy making, thus enabling governments of the right and left to pursue ideological agendas without public push-back. Prof. Mettler sees this phenomenon as a threat to democratic institutions and evidence-based policy making. My doctoral research seeks to test Prof. Mettler’s thesis in the Canadian context. But roadblocks abound, including access to coherent data.
The trend to hide these expenditures is beginning to change. To be sure, there is a long road ahead. The first step is accurately describing tax expenditures. Then, advocates need to call for the elimination of those programs not well aligned to the broad public interest. We must do more to grasp the political implications of a tax-expenditure-driven system of public policy. Thankfully, we are one step closer.
< http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/how-canada-got-a-step-closer-to-taming-its-big-fiscal-beast/article29056199/ >
Tags: budget, economy, featured, ideology, participation, tax
This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 8th, 2016 at 1:15 pm and is filed under Governance Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
333 Responses to “How Canada got a step closer to taming its big fiscal beast”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
If you don’t mind, where do you host your weblog? I am looking for a very good web host and your webpage seams to be extremely fast and up most the time…
Simply wish to say the frankness in your article is surprising.
Thanks , I’ve recently been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far. But, what concerning the bottom line? Are you certain concerning the source?
Greetings! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information. You have done a wonderful job!
We need to build frameworks and funding mechanisms.
I have to say this post was certainly informative and contains useful content for enthusiastic visitors. I will definitely bookmark this website for future reference and further viewing. cheers a bunch for sharing this with us!
I have been comparing virtual hair colour tools because I want a careful change before my salon visit, not a extreme reinvention. My usual brown hair can look golden outside, although it seems fine in the mirror. The cooler examples make my skin look better, but I know a filter is not a promise. I took photographs in daylight and kept only modest ideas. For comparison, I used [url=https://hair-expert.top]this hair tone resource[/url] and wrote down shades that seemed possible without bleach. I would prefer a simple gloss or a small adjustment. I need honest language for my stylist, rather than a promise based on one edited photograph. Would you call this cool brown, soft ash, or simply less warmth? I would especially value advice from clients who has carefully made one minor change and then lived with it in changing daylight for many weeks. Which warning sign matters most: a reference that needs lightening, a result that only works under one lamp, or a shade that will quickly turn warm again? I would rather bring two sensible options than demand one exact result.
Hey everyone,
I’ve been working to figure out whether I belong to Deep Winter or Deep Summer, and frankly, it’s been pretty overwhelming. I have dark hair and a skin tone that’s hard to pin down—my undertone is pretty unclear, so it’s tough to tell which palette flatters me best. Some of the Deep Winter colors like the rich navy blues and pure black really accentuate a sharpness in my face, but then I notice that some of the more muted, dusty plums and greys from Deep Summer also make me look polished and less harsh.
The difficult thing is that both palettes have overlapping cool, deep tones, so it’s hard to see the minor differences in how they interact with my skin. Sometimes, when I experiment with clothes or scarves from each palette, the lighting changes everything—I can look vibrant one moment and faded the next.
I did find some helpful comparison charts online that highlight the key differences between Deep Winter and Deep Summer, especially around undertones and contrast levels, which helped a bit [url=https://color-type.top]skin undertone test[/url] . But even with those, it’s still a struggle because my skin doesn’t lean clearly cool or warm, and my dark hair and eyes don’t really offer any clarity either.
Has anyone else faced this back-and-forth with these deep, cool seasons? How did you end up deciding which palette fits you better? Are there specific subtle tells or tests that helped you figure it out without going for a full professional analysis? I’d greatly appreciate any tips or personal stories so I can stop feeling stuck between these two palettes. Thanks a lot!
Hi you all, I’m wanting to support my teenager who’s seriously considering changing their hair color. They have a cool summer complexion—fair skin with blue eyes and a naturally ashy blonde tone—and we want to steer clear of damage and odd color results. We’ve researched hair color analysis to understand how different dyes interact with cool summer coloring, and it seems temporary dyes are less risky since they wash out, but permanent dyes might offer a more uniform color. I’m genuinely worried about harsh chemicals affecting their already delicate hair and how the dye might not suit their skin tone. I found a helpful resource comparing the pros and cons of temporary vs. permanent dyes through the lens of color theory, which helped clear things up [url=https://hairstyle-expert.top]soft summer hair color[/url] . Has anyone handled a teenager’s eagerness to experiment with hair color while also protecting their hair health and remaining faithful to their cool summer coloring? Any advice on what was successful—maybe a specific product or a dye type that was careful with the hair yet color-true—would be so helpful. Also, did you notice any unexpected complexion mismatches with either type of dye? Thank you so much for any guidance!
На практике под накруткой ПФ понимают искусственное улучшение действий пользователей на сайте – [url=https://max.ru/nakrutka_pf_faktorov]где заказать накрутку пф.[/url]
Подобный подход способен временно поднять показатели, однако стабильного результата он обычно не обеспечивает. Обычно такие действия основаны на создании сценариев, похожих на поведение обычных пользователей.
Если система заметит несоответствие, эффект может обнулиться, а доверие к ресурсу снизиться. Именно этот вариант обеспечивает долгосрочный результат и снижает вероятность проблем.
My brother suggested I might like this web site. He was entirely right. This post actually made my day. You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!
I had fun reading this post. I want to see more on this subject.. Gives Thanks for writing this nice article.. Anyway, I’m going to subscribe to your rss and I wish you write great articles again soon.
Hi guys,
I’ve started learning about seasonal color theory, mainly to figure out what colors actually look good on me. I’ve come across the Deep Summer palette and find it very interesting—those muted, cool tones seem exactly right for my complexion. But here’s where I get stuck: a lot of the seasonal palette advice feels directed at women’s fashion, with suggestions like skirts and blouses in certain hues or makeup tips that probably don’t apply. I mostly wear fairly typical men’s wardrobe staples—think chinos, button-downs, simple sweaters—and I’m curious how these seasonal colors apply in that setting.
Specifically, has anyone had success incorporating something like Deep Summer colors in everyday men’s styling without feeling too out of place? I’m aiming for a look that’s clean but not overdone or overly trendy. I also wonder if certain shades within these palettes are better suited for men, or if sticking closely to the whole palette is more effective.
I’ve been reading some good blog posts that approach seasonal theory with a focus on men’s fashion, which is useful, but I’d love to hear from people who’ve genuinely tried it out. Did using a seasonal palette influence the way you put looks together? Any practical examples or testimonials would be really valuable, especially if you could mention any specific pieces or combinations that worked well.
Thanks in advance! If you know of any good resources or personal stories, please share—I want to feel confident testing out different hues in a way that feels authentic to a guy’s style.
Here’s one site I found insightful: [url=https://color-expert.top]color analysis app[/url]
When we look at these issues, we know that they are the key ones for our time.
I appreciate, cause I found just what I was looking for. You’ve ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye -.
What a great article.. i subscribed btw!
What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to contribute & help other users like its aided me. Great job.
How long have you been in this field? You seem to know a lot more than I do, I’d love to know your sources!
Hello lads!
I came across a 187 great site that I think you should explore.
This site is packed with a lot of useful information that you might find insightful.
It has everything you could possibly need, so be sure to give it a visit!
[url=https://www.pulse.sn/lifestyle/beaute-bienetre/quelques-remedes-naturels-pour-lutter-contre-la-chute-de-cheveux/d9gvkbr]https://www.pulse.sn/lifestyle/beaute-bienetre/quelques-remedes-naturels-pour-lutter-contre-la-chute-de-cheveux/d9gvkbr[/url]
Furthermore do not neglect, folks, — one constantly are able to inside this particular piece find solutions to your the absolute complicated inquiries. Our team tried — explain the complete information using an very accessible method.
Всем добрый день! Мы с домочадцами скоро едем в Прагу и обдумываем разные варианты, как сделать экскурсию занимательной и приятной для детей. Очень мечтаем попробовать прокатиться на фуникулере, но пока не окончательно понимаем, насколько это будет удобно и безопасно для маленьких туристов. Можете поведать опытом: как дети воспринимают эту поездку, сильно ли страшно, не страшно ли на вершине, и стоит ли добавлять этот аттракцион в программу прогулок? Заметила на официальном сайте расписание и цены, кто-то уже проверял его? Вот ссылка для тех, кому интересно [url=https://pragagid.top]красивые города чехии[/url] . Заранее благодарна за рекомендации!