How Canada got a step closer to taming its big fiscal beast
TheGlobeandMail.com – ROB/Commentary
Mar. 08, 2016. Dylan Marando
Dylan Marando is a PhD student at the University of Toronto and a former adviser in the Office of the Premier of Ontario.
On Feb. 23, the Department of Finance made the unprecedented decision to release tax expenditure figures in database format. You may not have felt the tremor, but this liberation of hitherto cloistered information was earth-moving in the world of Canadian public finance. It has brought us one step closer to understanding and thus taming Canada’s most unwieldy fiscal beast – a hidden multibillion-dollar boondoggle born from an excessive politicization of public policy.
For years now, the government has been drifting toward the use of tax expenditure as a means of policy, and we have lacked the tools to analyze what’s happening. Colloquially known as boutique tax breaks, benefits, or loopholes, this policy instrument has generated programs such as the Public Transit Tax Credit and the Children’s Fitness Tax Credit. Measures such as these are thought to incentivize desired behaviours through targeted tax relief.
It sounds simple, almost like a tax cut. But, in fact, these budgetary boogeymen are subsidies to the select few, often conveniently benefiting the sorts of voters that form the support base of the political powers that be. Many tax expenditures, but thankfully not all, are disproportionately beneficial to the wealthy given their countervailing effect on the progressivity of the income tax system. Research by Ben Sand and Peter Taylor for the Frontier Centre For Public Policy notes that the top income quartile in Canada claims 43 per cent of the value for the aforementioned public transit credit and 71 per cent of the value for the children’s fitness credit.
As the Parliamentary Budget Office reported, already in 2009 there were 189 of these programs, costing the government more than $100-billion a year and representing an astounding 7.5 per cent of gross domestic product. The cost of tax expenditures is greater than the voted appropriations of the federal government.
More troubling, tax expenditures are invisible in the policy discourse. They are not reported in the budget. There is no statutory obligation to review them. As far back as 1976, those skeptical of the tool’s stubborn opacity and growing power asked the government to inform Parliament of costs and benefits. The parliamentary secretary to the minister of finance rose and said: “The information requested is not generated routinely in the regular processing of taxation data. To obtain this information would require special data processing the cost of which would be several thousand dollars. Answering the question would thus be prohibitively expensive.”
Amazingly, that answer was the standard for 40 years. The government did not start reporting on tax expenditures in any form until 1979. It was not until 1994 that the Department of Finance began publishing estimates; even then, the information that came was highly unusable.
In an analysis from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Canada’s former chief statistician said of the programs: “Taxpayers neither know accurately how much tax they are paying nor do they have any knowledge of the many ways their tax dollars are being spent, and with what effectiveness.” In the United States, critics have been sounding alarms for years. Cornell University professor Suzanne Mettler argues that tax expenditures create a “submerged state” that detaches the public from policy making, thus enabling governments of the right and left to pursue ideological agendas without public push-back. Prof. Mettler sees this phenomenon as a threat to democratic institutions and evidence-based policy making. My doctoral research seeks to test Prof. Mettler’s thesis in the Canadian context. But roadblocks abound, including access to coherent data.
The trend to hide these expenditures is beginning to change. To be sure, there is a long road ahead. The first step is accurately describing tax expenditures. Then, advocates need to call for the elimination of those programs not well aligned to the broad public interest. We must do more to grasp the political implications of a tax-expenditure-driven system of public policy. Thankfully, we are one step closer.
< http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/how-canada-got-a-step-closer-to-taming-its-big-fiscal-beast/article29056199/ >
Tags: budget, economy, featured, ideology, participation, tax
This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 8th, 2016 at 1:15 pm and is filed under Governance Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
391 Responses to “How Canada got a step closer to taming its big fiscal beast”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
What a great article.. i subscribed btw!
What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to contribute & help other users like its aided me. Great job.
How long have you been in this field? You seem to know a lot more than I do, I’d love to know your sources!
Hello lads!
I came across a 187 great site that I think you should explore.
This site is packed with a lot of useful information that you might find insightful.
It has everything you could possibly need, so be sure to give it a visit!
[url=https://www.pulse.sn/lifestyle/beaute-bienetre/quelques-remedes-naturels-pour-lutter-contre-la-chute-de-cheveux/d9gvkbr]https://www.pulse.sn/lifestyle/beaute-bienetre/quelques-remedes-naturels-pour-lutter-contre-la-chute-de-cheveux/d9gvkbr[/url]
Furthermore do not neglect, folks, — one constantly are able to inside this particular piece find solutions to your the absolute complicated inquiries. Our team tried — explain the complete information using an very accessible method.
Всем добрый день! Мы с домочадцами скоро едем в Прагу и обдумываем разные варианты, как сделать экскурсию занимательной и приятной для детей. Очень мечтаем попробовать прокатиться на фуникулере, но пока не окончательно понимаем, насколько это будет удобно и безопасно для маленьких туристов. Можете поведать опытом: как дети воспринимают эту поездку, сильно ли страшно, не страшно ли на вершине, и стоит ли добавлять этот аттракцион в программу прогулок? Заметила на официальном сайте расписание и цены, кто-то уже проверял его? Вот ссылка для тех, кому интересно [url=https://pragagid.top]красивые города чехии[/url] . Заранее благодарна за рекомендации!
Hello, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Chrome, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other than that, awesome blog!
Nice piece of info! May I reference part of this on my blog if I post a backlink to this webpage? Thx.
Enjoyed reading through this, very good material. Thanks!
I think it is a nice point of view. I most often meet people who rather say what they suppose others want to hear. Good and well written! I will come back to your site for sure!
The TBC Talent Calculator keeps your character planning organized. 5dd005ef.
I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I do not know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!
I discovered your weblog site on google and verify just a few of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the very good operate. I simply further up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader.
What made you first develop an interest in this topic?
Hey people, I’m a school student just beginning to explore color theory, and I’m honestly pretty overwhelmed. I’ve been trying to figure out my personal color palette, but my undertones just fail to fit neatly into warm or cool. I’ve taken many online quizzes, and the results are all over the place—one said I’m a soft summer (cool and muted), another called me neutral warm, and yet another just labeled my undertones as neutral. It gets even more complicated when I try the standard tests like looking at my wrist veins—I can clearly see hints of both blue and green—and holding white paper next to my face changes how my skin looks depending on the lighting. Some days it feels like I’m warm, other days cool, and sometimes just neutral, which is the most vague answer! It’s really overwhelming because I want to pick clothes and makeup that match me, but when the indicators contradict each other, it’s hard to know what to trust. I came across a detailed blog post about analyzing neutral skin undertones that helped clarify some of this confusion and offered some helpful advice, so I wanted to share it with anyone else grappling with the same issue [url=https://color-palette.top]skin tone chart[/url] . Has anyone else dealt with confusing neutral undertones and learned ways to figure out which palettes actually work for them? Do you think it’s better to trust your eyes when testing colors in natural light rather than quizzes? Any tricks, tricks, or personal stories about dealing with mixed or unclear undertone signals would be really appreciated!
Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that.|
I think I might disagree with some of your analysis. Are the figures solid?
I dont think Ive caught all the angles of this subject the way youve pointed them out. Youre a true star, a rock star man. Youve got so much to say and know so much about the subject that I think you should just teach a class about it
I think other website proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and great user pleasant style and design .
I know this is not exactly on topic, but i have a blog using the blogengine platform as well and i’m having issues with my comments displaying. is there a setting i am forgetting? maybe you could help me out? thank you.
You are one talented writer thank you for the post.