Harper, Hudak and the dangers of an education
TheStar.com – Opinion/Commentary – The Prime Minister and the Ontario Tory leader are great examples of the damage a good education can do.
Dec. 12, 2013. By: Rick Salutin, Columnist
Tim Hudak is a great example of the damage a good education can do. So is Stephen Harper. Both are products of university economics departments in the late 20th century. Each has a proud M.A. in the field. Like their American cognate — Paul Ryan — they’ve chosen to implement economic policy with no or little experience in the work world. Hudak worked briefly at a low level for Walmart; almost an internship. Since then — all politics.
Here’s what they learned from courses in post-Keynesian, Friedmanite economics. It’s pure theory. It says the world works best when everyone comes to market, like a little piggy, with whatever they have: money, skills, needs. They dicker and set prices for each other’s stuff and the best possible outcome results. Anything that interferes with these individual interactions is a Bad Thing.
They know (because they were taught) that the ideal may not always be achievable in every way. But you should do your best to keep things as pure as possible. I take them as intellectual idealists who swear by this stuff; people who get their hands dirty in business are less likely to be true believers, though they can see the usefulness of guys with the pure faith like Hudak and Harper.
That’s why they hate unions. Unions interfere with those Robinson Crusoe-esque individuals interacting in solitary perfection. It absolutely ruins the model they lovingly learned. It’s amazing how influential ideas you imbibed when you were impressionable can be. Keynes said, “the world is ruled by little else.” But he spoke as the Great Contrarian to “classical” economics.
So Stephen Harper has done what he can to scourge the union landscape. He sent railway and airline workers back to work or voided strikes before they began. He’s prepared legislation to impede union action and undermine public sector unions — including inserting his government, rather than an impartial board, as the decider on essential services. Hudak seems ready to run an almost entirely anti-union campaign in Ontario’s next election. He models it on U.S. “right to work,” or “right to work for less,” laws.
The reason I invoke their youthful academic formation, is that these battles have been largely won. The labour movement is a shadow of what it was. The manufacturing sector, which used to lead and had the best contracts, was savaged by free trade deals that let owners move plants elsewhere, or threaten to and get concessions. In Ontario just recently, we’ve lost Heinz in Leamington, Kellogg’s in London, Electro-Motive Diesel also in London, U.S. Steel in Hamilton, Redpath Sugar in Niagara, Bick’s in Dunnville, Chatham’s Navistar and the St. Thomas Ford plant. And they were a remnant of the remnant. Only the public sector unions retain any vigour, since they’re harder to free-trade out, and they now face the blast, as trade deals continue to rain down on us.
Yet Harper and Hudak rail on, as if fearful the corpse might rise from its coffin — which it might; there are efforts to resuscitate labour. And if those fail, some new version to represent the new workforce could emerge. Devout intellectual crusaders never let down their guard. I actually think in Hudak’s case, it’s electorally counterproductive. There’s lots of sympathy, or just nostalgia, in Ontario for the old days of union wages as community backbones.
It’s as if he’s trying to shut the barn door after the horse he wants to liberate — the one that undermines unions — has bolted. But the most he can do is close that door so the horse can’t get back in. Why would it even want to? That’s why I call it less a sign of calculation or meanness, than intellectual romanticism.
I should acknowledge, re: the real influence of abstract theory, ECONned, by Yves Smith of nakedcapitalism.com, who notes the special delusion of economists: “Every social science save economics rests on the assumption of human irrationality.” She has gobs of Wall St. experience plus the best pen name on the Internet. I could also mention Canada’s foremost academic, economist Harold Innis, who approvingly cited someone else saying: “the whole external history of science is a history of the resistance of academies and universities to the progress of knowledge.”
Tags: economy, ideology, rights, standard of living, tax
This entry was posted on Friday, December 13th, 2013 at 3:36 pm and is filed under Governance Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
334 Responses to “Harper, Hudak and the dangers of an education”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
Thanks for posting this. Looking for these resources 😀
Hi my family member! I want to say that this article is amazing, great written and include approximately all important infos. I’d like to see more posts like this .
I was reading through some of your content on this internet site and I believe this web site is very informative ! Continue posting .
Howdy! I simply wish to give a huge thumbs up for the great information you have here on this post. I will be coming again to your weblog for extra soon.
Hi, I just hopped over to your web-site through StumbleUpon. Not somthing I might typically browse, but I liked your views none the less. Thanks for making something worthy of reading through.
Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!
Thanks for another great post. Where else may anybody get that type of info in such an ideal way of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I’m at the search for such information.
While this issue can vexed most people, my thought is that there has to be a middle or common ground that we all can find. I do value that you’ve added pertinent and sound commentary here though. Thank you!
The post is absolutely great! Lots of great info and inspiration, both of which we all need! Also like to admire the time and effort you put into your blog and detailed information you offer! I will bookmark your website!
whoah this weblog is great i really like studying your articles. Stay up the great work! You already know, lots of persons are looking round for this information, you can aid them greatly.
I would really like to appreciate the endeavors you cash in on written this article. I’m going for the similar best product from you finding out in the foreseeable future as well. Actually your creative writing abilities has urged me to begin my very own blog now. Genuinely the blogging is distributing its wings rapidly. Your write down is often a fine illustration showing it.
Very often I go to see this blog. It very much is pleasant to me. Thanks the author
A neighbor of mine encouraged me to take a look at your blog site couple weeks ago, given that we both love similar stuff and I will need to say I am quite impressed.
I feel that is among the so much significant info for me. And i am satisfied studying your article. However should commentary on some basic issues, The site style is ideal, the articles is in reality excellent : D. Excellent activity, cheers
These are some of the most important issues we’ll face over the next few decades.
I think other website proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and great user pleasant style and design .
Our communities really need to deal with this.
Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thank you
Have you always been concerned about these issues?
Hello. Great job. I did not expect this on a Wednesday. This is a great story. Thanks!