Funding, reforms to abuse program concerns women’s issues experts

Posted on September 30, 2015 in Child & Family Delivery System – News/Canada – Premier Kathleen Wynne must “immediately address” the concerns raised by community experts on domestic violence over the province’s court-mandated counselling program, says a critic on women’s issues.
Sep 30 2015.   By: Emily Mathieu, Investigative News reporter

Premier Kathleen Wynne must “immediately address” the concerns raised by community experts on domestic violence over the province’s court-mandated counselling program, says a provincial critic on women’s issues.
The plea to Wynne comes in an open letter from MPP Peggy Sattler (London West) with the New Democratic Party. Sattler is worried about funding for the Ministry of the Attorney General’s Partner Assault Response program, as well as a 2014 move to cut the length of the group counselling program to 12 weeks from 16.

“When will your government commit to listen to the frontline agencies involved with PAR, who are imploring the attorney general to reconsider the changes to PAR funding and program delivery?” wrote Sattler.

“Premier, no one wants the changes to PAR to result in an “I told you so.” Women in Ontario should not have to wait for another intimate partner homicide or serious injury — occurring after an abuser has completed PAR and returned to the relationship — before your government takes action.”

PAR programs are used as a tool to hold lower-risk or first-time offenders accountable for their actions when there is a low chance of conviction, and provide support for and aim to reduce harm for victims.

Monday, the Star reported that more than two dozen agencies and experts in domestic violence from across the province had written group letters to the ministry complaining the program is in “crisis.”

One Toronto agency, formerly in charge of overseeing intake and referrals for five domestic courts in Ontario, described the program as being used in some cases as a “revolving door” because men with a history of domestic violence, or who used a weapon during an assault, or attacked a pregnant partner were being released on conditions and sent to PAR, rather than first facing a criminal conviction.

A ministry spokesperson told the Star the government is dedicated to the safety of women and children, and is in the process of improving the program through a two-year “staged initiative” that started a year ago. Those changes, including the decision to cut the length of the program to 12 weeks from 16, were made following consultations with PAR providers who indicated more than 3,000 men were waiting for spots, he said.

They are tracking the results and by 2017, the ministry hopes to release a recidivism study, he said. The changes also included tightening the rules around dealing with men with histories of violence.

“We remain open-minded about possible reforms as long as victim safety, accountability and program integrity are not compromised,” he said. Ministry staff have met and will continue to meet with agencies throughout the fall and are investigating all concerns, he said via email.

In the letter released Monday, Sattler includes statistics collected by the Building a Bigger Wave network, one of the groups that wrote the letters. The network, a collection of front-line workers, academics and experts, polled service providers and their support networks across the province about the changes and presented those results to the Ministry in July. More than half, the results showed, felt changes to PAR would have a negative impact on the safety of victims of violence in their community, and 86 per cent were concerned about the impact on safety.

The cut in the length of the program, wrote Sattler, was made without research on potential outcomes, including the impact on the safety of women and children.

“It was driven purely by the need to cut costs, in the face of a growing waitlist of thousands of abusers who had been ordered by the court to participate in the program. Instead of a longer-term program to engage men in ending their abusive behaviours, PAR now functions as little more than 12 weeks of anger management for often violent and dangerous offenders,” she wrote.

< >

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 30th, 2015 at 9:05 am and is filed under Child & Family Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Funding, reforms to abuse program concerns women’s issues experts”

  1. The worst mistake any decision-maker that has the powers-to-be can make is to move forward with a directive without talking with the very people that are being affected by the change. To avoid gathering necessary information about the program PARS, from those who work the program, is a gross error in judgement with significant multi-layered damaging effects. This decision, coming from a woman who prides herself in talking to the people of Ontario about “what really matters” is nothing short of discouraging. Is the protection of women from intimate partner abuse not a concern to Wynne?
    Lundy Bancroft, author, workshop leader and consultant on domestic abuse and child maltreatment posits that programs should range from 18-36 months (a far cry from the suggested 12 weeks)in order to be effective. He states that a poorly-run program can endanger abused women, abusive men from accountability, and be used as a tool for an abuser’s manipulations. Bancroft argues the gravity of consistent monitoring and assessing of the quality of programs.
    The issue of domestic violence is a relevant one. The Canadian Women’s Foundation states each year over 40 000 arrests result from domestic violence (only 22 % are reported). How does this affect us all you ask? According to the Department of Justice, each year, Canadians collectively spend $7.4 billion to deal with the aftermath of spousal violence. As well, in Canada, every six days a woman is killed by her intimate partner.
    Mandating an abusive partner to merely 12 weeks of PARS is hardly going to bring these stats down. If the consensus is treatment programs for abusive partners, then they have to be effective otherwise the mandate is moot.


Leave a Reply