Elizabeth Wettlaufer murder inquiry must confront struggling long-term care system
TheStar.com – Opinion/Commentary – Nurse got away with murder because nursing home residents, no matter their age, are expected to die.
Aug. 4, 2017. By
Perversely, Elizabeth Wettlaufer’s casual and systematic murder of eight Ontario nursing home residents in her care may end up accomplishing one thing.
It may finally force the provincial government to confront the dysfunctional nature of its long-term care system.
This, at least, is the hope following the government’s publication Tuesday of the terms of reference meant to guide a judicial inquiry into the former nurse’s crimes.
Justice Eileen Gillese is being given an extraordinarily broad mandate. The government is calling on her to not only look into the specific events that led to the murders but also “the circumstances and contributing factors” that allowed these events to take place, including the effect of “policies, procedures, practices and accountability and oversight mechanisms” as well as any other “relevant matters that the commission considers necessary.”
In short, the appeal court justice is being empowered to look at just about everything to do with long-term care that could have contributed to this tragedy. Let’s hope she takes advantage of the opportunity.
What is striking about Wettlaufer’s crimes is how easy they were to commit. Between 2007 and 2014 she managed to give fatal insulin overdoses to eight separate patients in her care.
She also tried, unsuccessfully, to murder four others and committed two instances of aggravated assault.
Yet until she voluntarily confessed to staff at Toronto’s Centre for Addiction and Mental Health last fall, it seems that no one suspected a thing.
Not her employers, even though one of them had fired her for overmedicating a patient. Not the College of Nurses of Ontario, which regulates her profession. Not the officials who signed the death certificates. Not the health ministry which oversees long-term care.
The key reason why no one suspected foul play, I suspect, is that nursing home patients are expected to die.
Had the victims been babies, someone might have asked questions. But a nursing home resident’s death is seen as normal even when, as in the case of one 63-year-old that Wettlaufer tried to kill, the victim is not unusually old.
Indeed, outside of residents’ families, few have a material incentive to keep nursing home patients alive. The government’s political aim is to get eligible seniors off the waiting list and into long-term care beds as quickly as possible without spending too much.
The greater the turnover at nursing homes, the faster and more cheaply this waiting list will go down.
Similarly, nursing homes face no financial loss if a resident dies. There are always people anxious to fill the beds of those who pass on.
I am not suggesting that governments and nursing homes are conspiring to bump off elderly long-term care residents. I am suggesting that neither has a material incentive to look too closely if seemingly natural deaths do occur.
It is perhaps telling that of the eight killed by Wettlaufer only two had autopsies performed.
There is much that Gillese’s one-person judicial inquiry can usefully look at. It can, of course, look at the obvious questions: Why was it so easy for Wettlaufer to get her hands on insulin and then improperly inject it? Why didn’t the College of Nurses investigate her after she was fired for overmedicating? How did she manage to assault and kill so many over such a long time without anyone noticing?
It can also look at broader structural issues: Would nursing homes be safer if they were better-staffed? Should physicians on contract to nursing homes be expected to do more than make regular scheduled visits and consult occasionally by telephone? Is the current requirement of one registered nurse per home sufficient? Would a real and properly funded home-care system take some of the pressure from long-term care institutions? Or like the move to so-called community mental care a few decades ago is the promise of home care just an empty slogan used by governments keen to cut costs?
But perhaps the most important question the inquiry can answer is this: Why was it so easy for officialdom to conclude that these deaths were natural? People live a long time these days. Why should so many assume that a nursing home resident already has one foot in the grave?
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2017/08/04/elizabeth-wettlaufer-murder-inquiry-must-confront-struggling-long-term-care-system-walkom.html
Tags: crime prevention, disabilities, Health, standard of living
This entry was posted on Friday, August 4th, 2017 at 11:12 am and is filed under Child & Family Delivery System. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
265 Responses to “Elizabeth Wettlaufer murder inquiry must confront struggling long-term care system”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
Just want to say what a great blog you got here!I’ve been around for quite a lot of time, but finally decided to show my appreciation of your work!
I encountered your site after doing a search for new contesting using Google, and decided to stick around and read more of your articles. Thanks for posting, I have your site bookmarked now.
A change in the mix can alter the feeling of a dreamlike scene. b109eb4e.
I Am Going To have to come back again when my course load lets up – however I am taking your Rss feed so i can go through your site offline. Thanks.
This is my first time i visit here. I found so many helpful stuff in your website especially its discussion. From the tons of responses on your posts, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the excellent work
Nice blog here! Also your web site loads up very fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol
There is a lot of misunderstanding about these issues today. Your material helps explain things.
bonjour I love Your Blog can not say I come here often but im liking what i c so far….
I would really like to appreciate the endeavors you cash in on written this article. I’m going for the similar best product from you finding out in the foreseeable future as well. Actually your creative writing abilities has urged me to begin my very own blog now. Genuinely the blogging is distributing its wings rapidly. Your write down is often a fine illustration showing it.
Some truly interesting info , well written and broadly user genial .
I was reading through some of your content on this internet site and I believe this web site is very informative ! Continue posting .
Woh I enjoy your content , saved to bookmarks!
Cherished is likely to be what people say about your comments.
A comprehensive Malay-language Islamic guide providing step-by-step instructions, clear Arabic text with Rumi transliterations, and translations for Tahlil ringkas, Doa Arwah, Solat Jenazah, Doa Selamat, and Ziarah Kubur.
Public policy is key here, and our states need to develop some strategies – – soon.
I think other website proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and great user pleasant style and design .
Have you given any kind of thought at all with converting your current web-site into French? I know a couple of of translaters here that will would certainly help you do it for no cost if you want to get in touch with me personally.
If most people wrote about this subject with the eloquence that you just did, I’m sure people would do much more than just read, they act. Great stuff here. Please keep it up.
Clear, concise and easy to access.
Just wanna admit that this is extremely helpful, Thanks for taking your time to write this.