CPP, subsidizing survivor pensions, not fair — to a point

Posted on October 3, 2017 in Social Security Debates

NationalPost.com – Health/Seniors
September 29, 2017.   WANDA MORRIS

It’s not fair!

I remember my 10-year-old self being absolutely incensed. My older sister was getting new clothes; I was getting (mostly) hand-me-downs.

My mom explained that there wasn’t enough money for new clothes for both of us, and my sister’s old clothes had plenty of life left. It wasn’t fair. But, in retrospect, with limited resources and growing children, it was the right thing to do.

Today, I hear a lot about unfairness from our members. One subject that draws more anger than most is the Canada Pension Plan (CPP).

The plan is a bit like reverse life insurance. In life insurance, you pay a premium for decades with one of two outcomes: you die early and your survivors receive a cheque, or you die late and are rewarded with a long life.

In CPP, the opposite happens, you either get both a long life and lots of pension cheques, or a short life and a moderate benefit to your surviving spouse, if you have one.

Besides the unarguable unfairness of dying young, many spouses are aggrieved because their survivor’s pension is only a fraction of their spouse’s full pension (the survivor’s pension is 60 per cent of the spouse’s pension) or they don’t get even that (combined earned and survivor pensions cannot exceed the maximum earned pension under CPP).

Others, who have no surviving spouse, are angry that they can’t pass their survivor’s benefit to anyone else and are effectively forced to subsidize survivor’s pensions for those who are married.

The proposed Ontario Retirement Pension Plan (ORPP) attempted to rectify this by providing everyone paying into it a survival benefit for their spouse, beneficiary or estate if the individual died within 10 years of retirement. When Ontario dropped its provincial pension program in favour of a national CPP enhancement, this refinement was dropped along with it.

Not only do the benefits paid out of CPP vary by the recipient’s marital status and longevity, the amount paid in to receive a particular level of benefit can vary considerably, too.

While all working Canadians aged 18 to 65 who earn $3,500 or more from one employer must contribute to CPP; only our 39 top-earning years are used in calculating our pensions from CPP. As long as we’ve paid maximum CPP premiums in at least 39 years, we are eligible for the maximum CPP pension payout. We could work another 10 or 20 years, but our pension cheque will not change.

An additional provision lets parents who took time out to raise children drop additional years and still qualify for a maximum CPP payout. While the child-rearing provision can be exercised by whichever parent is the primary caregiver for their children, some men argue that their premiums should be reduced so they aren’t subsidizing CPP benefits for (primarily) women who are out of the workforce.

The fundamental problem with CPP is that it serves two masters: it’s designed to serve as a self-funding aid to financial security in retirement and to alleviate the plight of impoverished single seniors, most of whom are women. If CPP were designed purely as a pension plan with no “interference” from policy objectives, pension payments would correlate with years worked, and individuals who are married would have to take a lower benefit on retirement so that funds would be available to pay a survivor’s pension benefit to their spouses.

Is CPP fair? No. But it’s also not fair that far too many older single women live in poverty. Subsidizing child-rearing years and paying survivors’ pensions may not be fair, but it’s the right thing to do.

http://nationalpost.com/health/seniors/grey-matters-cpp-subsidizing-survivor-pensions-not-fair-to-a-point

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 3rd, 2017 at 12:40 pm and is filed under Social Security Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

68 Responses to “CPP, subsidizing survivor pensions, not fair — to a point”

  1. I had fun reading this post. I want to see more on this subject.. Gives Thanks for writing this nice article.. Anyway, I’m going to subscribe to your rss and I wish you write great articles again soon.

  2. This is the kind of article that reminds you why reading long-form content online is still worthwhile, it delivered genuine insight and value from the very first sentence onwards.

  3. A comprehensive and engaging exploration of a topic that is often poorly explained elsewhere, this article fills a genuine gap and does so with impressive skill and thoroughness.

  4. Fantastic piece of content that kept me engaged from start to finish, the writing style is clear and the examples used throughout were practical and relatable.

  5. Highly recommend this to anyone looking for reliable information on this subject, the writing is trustworthy, well-sourced, and communicated in a very approachable manner.

  6. Bsport says:

    Surprisingly good post. I really found your primary webpage and additionally wanted to suggest that have essentially enjoyed searching your website blog posts. Whatever the case I’ll always be subscribing to your entire supply and I hope you jot down ever again soon!

  7. bsportscx says:

    Nice post.Very useful info specifically the last part 🙂 Thank you and good luck.

  8. I really believe you will do well in the future I appreciate everything you have added to my knowledge base.

  9. You certainly deserve a round of applause for your post and more specifically, your blog in general. Very high quality material!

  10. Regards for helping out, superb info.

  11. Great post, keep up the good work, I hope you don’t mind but I’ve added on my blog roll.

  12. vip79tips says:

    I am very happy to look your post. Thanks a lot and i am taking a look ahead to touch you.

  13. sex shows says:

    Dude.. I am not much into reading, but somehow I got to read lots of articles on your blog. Its amazing how interesting it is for me to visit you very often. –

  14. Great blog here! Also your site loads up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

  15. Great post, keep up the good work, I hope you don’t mind but I’ve added on my blog roll.

  16. Some truly nice stuff on this website , I like it.

  17. I love your blog. It looks every informative.

  18. 975280 756819Some genuinely good and utilitarian information on this web site, as properly I believe the style has got excellent capabilities. 72422

  19. Sizo Tipo says:

    I just couldn’t leave your website before suggesting that I really enjoyed the usual information an individual supply on your visitors? Is gonna be back often in order to investigate cross-check new posts

| Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply