Canada’s income gap ‘surprisingly unchanged’ despite perception

Posted on December 11, 2012 in Equality Debates

TheGlobeandMail.com – report-on-business/economy
Dec. 11 2012.    Tavia Grant

Income inequality has not worsened in Canada over the past decade — contrary to popular perception, a new paper argues.

While the country’s income gap grew significantly through the 1990s, it has remained “surprisingly unchanged” since 1998, a study by the Toronto-Dominion Bank out Tuesday contends.

Its findings differ from those of the Conference Board of Canada and the OECD, which have both warned income inequality has been growing in the past decade.

The sense of a growing gap in Canada, TD argues, may stem from other factors: the low absolute level of income among poorer Canadians, the growing share of income going to the top 1 per cent of earners, and the weak growth of incomes among middle-earner families.

Thus the “policy focus should not be on income inequality in-and-of itself, but rather to ensure equality of opportunity and how to improve the prospects for low and middle-income earners,” said the bank’s chief economist Craig Alexander.

Income inequality has been a big focus of debate, especially in the United States where U.S. President Barack Obama has called it the “defining issue of our time.”

However, “Canada’s story is much less clear cut,” Mr. Alexander says.

His research shows the income gap, as tracked by the traditional measure of the Gini coefficient, shows a widening in the 1990s – when the government was battling the deficit and cutting transfers – while since 1998 that gap has remained “essentially flat.”

It also looked at income gains in recent years – and found faster increases among lower-income households.

Families in the top quintile of the income scale saw after-inflation income gains of 18 per cent since 1998, while those in the bottom fifth recorded gains of 20 per cent.

The lagging performance, the bank says, is among middle-income households which saw gains of 14 per cent.

But this is only one metric. Lower-income families may have seen increases, but their absolute level of income “is often not sufficient to meet a family’s basic needs.”

Consider this: even with the gains in the past 14 years, the actual level of income among the bottom quintile amounted to just $15,200 in 2010.

Meantime, the top 1 per cent – the target of much of the Occupy movement’s criticism last year – is indeed taking a greater share of the income pie.

The top 1 per cent of earners in Canada accounted for 14 per cent of total income in 2010 – up from 8 per cent in 1982.

“While this may not be significant enough to skew the Gini coefficient, it is likely a key contributing factor to the sense that income inequality has intensified,” Mr. Alexander noted.

The picture changes further when the definition of inequality is broadened to include personal wealth.

The data show that about 70 per cent of the nation’s net worth is concentrated among the richest 20 per cent of Canadians.

This might represent a “more tangible notion of inequality” since stronger net worth often translates into more expensive homes, luxury cars and other high-end goods “beyond the reach of the majority of Canadians.”

< http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/canadas-income-gap-surprisingly-unchanged-despite-perception/article6189838/ >

Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 11th, 2012 at 9:59 am and is filed under Equality Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply