Canada needs a national dementia strategy
TheStar.com – Opinion/Commentary – By 2031, an estimated 1.4 million Canadians will be suffering from dementia. To provide these patients quality care, and to keep wait times under control, we need a national strategy.
Sep 13 2014. By: Dr. Chris Simpson
Just a few months ago as a panelist at a conference on dementia, I made front-page news by stating the obvious.
I said the reason there is a nine-month waiting time in this country for a hip replacement is because there are so many patients with dementia taking up acute-care hospital beds.
Why are they there?
Because there is nowhere else for them to go.
This problem may be old news to physicians and policy-makers but it is a real issue for hundreds of thousands of Canadian families who struggle to care for loved ones battling dementia. Just as is the case for health care generally in our country, the care and support you get from the system depends largely on where you live.
Canada and France were co-hosts last week to something called a Global Dementia Legacy Event growing out of last year’s G8 meeting in London. It was one of four global dementia “Legacy Events” being held to gather international dementia experts and come up with solutions.
Make no mistake, this international focus is good news. But Canada’s doctors and the patients we serve are interested in how this meeting will translate into strategic action to address a disturbing dilemma in our health care system here at home.
The health care system euphemistically calls people stranded in acute care hospital beds “alternate level of care patients.” Through no fault of their own, so-called ALC patients occupy 3 million bed days a year in our hospitals. They don’t have acute disease; they have chronic diseases. Fully one third suffer from dementia.
If this situation sounds urgent it is because it is. In fact, dementia numbers are staggering — and set to rise even higher — in most of the developed world. This is why 13 countries around the world have some form of national dementia strategy.
Strangely, Canada is not among them.
Sure, Ottawa has (since 2006) invested more than $860 million through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to support neuroscience research with $182 million earmarked for prevention, diagnosis and care of dementia. And the 2014 federal budget allocated new funding to CIHR for a consortium on neurodegeneration in aging. This investment in research is appropriate and welcomed. But it is only part of what we need to be doing to address this impending crisis.
No doubt organizers of the Canada-France conference will have plenty to report back to their (now G7) partners next year. But the time for discussing dementia in opaque, abstract language at high-level conferences is over.
The federal government needs to be doing some things — now — like sitting down with the provinces to develop a dementia strategy that aims to give Canadians with dementia the care they deserve, at home and in their communities, while freeing up expensive acute care hospital beds to serve the patients for whom they are intended.
Ottawa, the provinces and territories should be talking about more support for families and other caregivers, home-care support where possible and addressing a serious deficit in long-term care facilities.
Or, Ottawa could be taking the lead in helping to develop a comprehensive health human resources plan that assembles the right mix of health care providers to properly care for the 747,000 Canadians with dementia. We need more geriatricians (there are only 260 in Canada) and we need to fully harness the great potential of multi-professional primary care teams. Canada’s family physicians speak eloquently and passionately about the “Medical Home” — the concept that all patients deserve a home base with professionals to care for their complex needs in their homes and communities. Canadians with dementia need this support and dedication.
The Alzheimer Society of Canada projects there will be 1.4 million Canadians suffering from dementia by 2031. This group, as well as CARP and others are united in calling for more political leadership to battle this terrible disease and to support families in their battle against it.
Canada today has almost as many diagnosed dementia patients as the United Kingdom does at 847,000, despite a difference in population of 30 million.
The United Kingdom has a dementia strategy. Why don’t we?
Dr. Chris Simpson is the new president of the Canadian Medical Association and chair of the Wait Time Alliance, a coalition of 18 specialist associations dedicated to eliminating unnecessary waits for medical tests, treatments and procedures.
< http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/09/13/canada_needs_a_national_dementia_strategy.html
>
Tags: disabilities, Health, mental Health, pharmaceutical, standard of living
This entry was posted on Sunday, September 14th, 2014 at 9:47 am and is filed under Health Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
67 Responses to “Canada needs a national dementia strategy”
« Older Comments | Newer Comments »
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
I absolutely adore your site! You aggressive me as able-bodied as all the others actuality and your broiled PS is absolutely great!
I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else experiencing issues with your site. It appears as though some of the written text on your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a problem with my web browser because I’ve had this happen before. Appreciate it
I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but I’m glad I visited. I will post a link to this site on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.
Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all people you really recognize what you are talking about! Bookmarked. Kindly also seek advice from my web site =). We can have a link alternate contract between us!
Admiring the time and effort you put into your site and detailed info you offer!
Great blog here! Additionally your website rather a lot up very fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate link for your host? I desire my website loaded up as fast as yours lol
I’ll check back after you publish more articles.
There is so much to try to understand
How long does it take you to write an article like this?
I appreciate your work, thanks for all the great blog posts.
I dont think I’ve read anything like this before. So good to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. cheers for starting this up. This blog is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality.
I will share you blog with my sis.
Your thing regarding creating will be practically nothing in short supply of awesome. This informative article is incredibly useful and contains offered myself a better solution to be able to my own issues. Which can be the specific purpose MY PARTNER AND I has been doing a search online. I am advocating this informative article with a good friend. I know they are going to get the write-up since beneficial as i would. Yet again many thanks.
You need to really control the comments listed here
I’ve thought about posting something about this before. Good job! Can I use part of your post in my blog?
I am very happy to look your post. Thanks a lot and i am taking a look ahead to touch you.
It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I want to suggest you some interesting things or suggestions. Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read more things about it!
It sounds like you’re creating problems yourself by defining this as such a comprehensive, almost unknowable problem. Isn’t that self-defeating?
This overview was really informative, supporting every claim with solid reasoning and real examples. Excellent from beginning to end, with no filler and no wasted sentences anywhere.
I found myself re-reading certain sections because they were so well explained. I especially appreciated how the conclusion tied everything together in a clear and satisfying way.