Canada needs a national dementia strategy
TheStar.com – Opinion/Commentary – By 2031, an estimated 1.4 million Canadians will be suffering from dementia. To provide these patients quality care, and to keep wait times under control, we need a national strategy.
Sep 13 2014. By: Dr. Chris Simpson
Just a few months ago as a panelist at a conference on dementia, I made front-page news by stating the obvious.
I said the reason there is a nine-month waiting time in this country for a hip replacement is because there are so many patients with dementia taking up acute-care hospital beds.
Why are they there?
Because there is nowhere else for them to go.
This problem may be old news to physicians and policy-makers but it is a real issue for hundreds of thousands of Canadian families who struggle to care for loved ones battling dementia. Just as is the case for health care generally in our country, the care and support you get from the system depends largely on where you live.
Canada and France were co-hosts last week to something called a Global Dementia Legacy Event growing out of last year’s G8 meeting in London. It was one of four global dementia “Legacy Events” being held to gather international dementia experts and come up with solutions.
Make no mistake, this international focus is good news. But Canada’s doctors and the patients we serve are interested in how this meeting will translate into strategic action to address a disturbing dilemma in our health care system here at home.
The health care system euphemistically calls people stranded in acute care hospital beds “alternate level of care patients.” Through no fault of their own, so-called ALC patients occupy 3 million bed days a year in our hospitals. They don’t have acute disease; they have chronic diseases. Fully one third suffer from dementia.
If this situation sounds urgent it is because it is. In fact, dementia numbers are staggering — and set to rise even higher — in most of the developed world. This is why 13 countries around the world have some form of national dementia strategy.
Strangely, Canada is not among them.
Sure, Ottawa has (since 2006) invested more than $860 million through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to support neuroscience research with $182 million earmarked for prevention, diagnosis and care of dementia. And the 2014 federal budget allocated new funding to CIHR for a consortium on neurodegeneration in aging. This investment in research is appropriate and welcomed. But it is only part of what we need to be doing to address this impending crisis.
No doubt organizers of the Canada-France conference will have plenty to report back to their (now G7) partners next year. But the time for discussing dementia in opaque, abstract language at high-level conferences is over.
The federal government needs to be doing some things — now — like sitting down with the provinces to develop a dementia strategy that aims to give Canadians with dementia the care they deserve, at home and in their communities, while freeing up expensive acute care hospital beds to serve the patients for whom they are intended.
Ottawa, the provinces and territories should be talking about more support for families and other caregivers, home-care support where possible and addressing a serious deficit in long-term care facilities.
Or, Ottawa could be taking the lead in helping to develop a comprehensive health human resources plan that assembles the right mix of health care providers to properly care for the 747,000 Canadians with dementia. We need more geriatricians (there are only 260 in Canada) and we need to fully harness the great potential of multi-professional primary care teams. Canada’s family physicians speak eloquently and passionately about the “Medical Home” — the concept that all patients deserve a home base with professionals to care for their complex needs in their homes and communities. Canadians with dementia need this support and dedication.
The Alzheimer Society of Canada projects there will be 1.4 million Canadians suffering from dementia by 2031. This group, as well as CARP and others are united in calling for more political leadership to battle this terrible disease and to support families in their battle against it.
Canada today has almost as many diagnosed dementia patients as the United Kingdom does at 847,000, despite a difference in population of 30 million.
The United Kingdom has a dementia strategy. Why don’t we?
Dr. Chris Simpson is the new president of the Canadian Medical Association and chair of the Wait Time Alliance, a coalition of 18 specialist associations dedicated to eliminating unnecessary waits for medical tests, treatments and procedures.
< http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/09/13/canada_needs_a_national_dementia_strategy.html
>
Tags: disabilities, Health, mental Health, pharmaceutical, standard of living
This entry was posted on Sunday, September 14th, 2014 at 9:47 am and is filed under Health Policy Context. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
64 Responses to “Canada needs a national dementia strategy”
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but I’m glad I visited. I will post a link to this site on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.
I don’t normally comment on blogs.. But nice post! I just bookmarked your site
Loved the conversational yet informative tone of this article, it makes a potentially dry subject feel lively and interesting which is a real achievement worth acknowledging here.
This article does something rare and valuable by making the reader feel smarter after reading it without ever making them feel talked down to, a delicate balance perfectly achieved here.
This article was incredibly helpful and well-written, providing detailed information that answered all my questions and left me feeling fully informed on the topic.
I Am Going To have to come back again when my course load lets up – however I am taking your Rss feed so i can go through your site offline. Thanks.
Greetings, have tried to subscribe to this websites rss feed but I am having a bit of a problem. Can anyone kindly tell me what to do?’
Admiring the time and effort you put into your site and detailed info you offer!
Do you offer workshops?
Great post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed! Very useful info specifically the last part 🙂 I care for such info much. I was looking for this certain information for a very long time. Thank you and good luck.
I feel that is among the so much significant info for me. And i am satisfied studying your article. However should commentary on some basic issues, The site style is ideal, the articles is in reality excellent : D. Excellent activity, cheers
Howdy I wanted to write a new remark on this page for you to be able to tell you just how much i actually Enjoyed reading this read. I have to run off to work but want to leave ya a simple comment. I saved you So will be returning following work in order to go through more of yer quality posts. Keep up the good work.
Greetings! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information. You have done a wonderful job!
When are you going to take this to a full book?
Most often since i look for a blog Document realize that the vast majority of blog pages happen to be amateurish. Not so,We can honestly claim for which you writen is definitely great and then your webpage rock solid.
Some genuinely choice content on this site, bookmarked .
Fantastic piece of writing here1
We can see that we need to develop policies to deal with this trend.
Our local network of agencies has found your research so helpful.
Thanks for a Interesting item; I enjoyed it very much. Regards Sang Magistrale